[PEIRCE-L] Re: Pragmatic Theory Of Truth

Thread: JA:https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2017-03/msg00098.html JA:https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2017-03/msg00100.html EVD:https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2017-03/msg00101.html JA:https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2017-03/msg00102.html

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Pragmatic Theory Of Truth

Clark, list: I have to say, I really like this sentence: “Peirce’s notion largely comes out of the idea that for a difference to be a difference it must make a difference and that those differences over time act on inquirers.” But this one leaves me uneasy: “Peirce gets the idea of habit

[PEIRCE-L] Re: Pragmatic Theory Of Truth

Helmut, A lot has been written on Bayes and Peirce, not all of it nonsense, so you might have some luck with a web search on those two names alone. The way my stats profs taught it, Bayes' Rule is a deductive theorem, so it cannot add one bit to the information you actually have in the data,

Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Pragmatic Theory Of Truth

Jerry, List Now I have had a look at the Commens Dictionary: Ok, to say that the immediate object is inside, and the dynamical object outside of the sign, is not exctly how Peirce wrote it. He rather wrote, that the immediate object is the object as represented in the sign, and the dynamical

[PEIRCE-L] Aw: Re: Pragmatic Theory Of Truth

Jon, List, I think maybe I have mixed too many differnt things with each other. As I have written to Jerry, I had remembered a thread on this list some time ago about Bayes, it was about Quantum-Bayesianism (QBism). Best, Helmut   20. März 2017 um 15:36 Uhr  "Jon Awbrey"

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Pragmatic Theory Of Truth

> On Mar 19, 2017, at 9:54 AM, Jon Awbrey wrote: > > Re: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/Pragmatic_theory_of_truth > > > I have been giving another look at the InterSciWiki (ISW) article on the >