Aw: [PEIRCE-L] The Role of Semiotics in Life

2021-08-03 Thread Helmut Raulien
  Jon, Edwina, List   It becomes a weasel, if people use it for explaining something else, instead of treating it as a yet not fully explained phenomenon. Then it is like the "dormative virtue" of Opium (Peirce). A pseudo-explanation.   Best Helmut   02. August 2021 um 18:48 Uhr  "Jon

Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Role of Semiotics in Life

2021-08-03 Thread Edwina Taborsky
Helmut - how is the term of 'emergence' used to explain something else? What is this 'something else' that is being explained? And are you saying that 'emergence' is a 'not fully explained phenomenon'? The abductive reality is: that a novel form of life 'emerges' as a discrete

Aw: [PEIRCE-L] The Role of Semiotics in Life

2021-08-03 Thread Helmut Raulien
Edwina, List   I am absolutely not against using the term, but against stopping at for example: "Life has emerged due to nature´s intention to form higher complexity". This would be using something, in this case "intention", that is a trait of life. So it is a tautology, like Peirce´s

Aw: [PEIRCE-L] The Role of Semiotics in Life

2021-08-03 Thread Helmut Raulien
Edwina, List   Nothing is problematic about that, the way you have put it. It surely is a fact of reality, and of empirical observation. But I think, there always should be mentioned what you have added, the WHY-question. Jon´s weasel-reference I do understand. There are galore pseudoscientific

[PEIRCE-L] The Role of Semiotics in Life

2021-08-03 Thread Edwina Taborsky
Helmut, list 1] I myself, have supported the concept of increased and increasing diversity and complexity as an explanation for the emergence of novel forms of matter. But that's hardly specific to me - not only was that an explanation provided by Peirce [see

Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Role of Semiotics in Life

2021-08-03 Thread Edwina Taborsky
Helmet, list - I’m not sure of your point. What’s problematic about saying that emergence is a fact of reality; ie it’s not a part of logic but of empirical observation. Now, to move on from this empirical observation of WHAT is observed to a hypothesis of WHY this is occurring is a

Aw: [PEIRCE-L] The Role of Semiotics in Life

2021-08-03 Thread Helmut Raulien
  Edwina, List   As often, this discussion merely is a misunderstanding of a term, in this case "explanation". I was arguing in a way, that might be understood such, like that an explanation only is valuable, and could justifiedly be called "explanation", if it is complete, including close

Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Role of Semiotics in Life

2021-08-03 Thread John F. Sowa
Helmut>  "Emergence" for me seems to be a not yet logically fully explained phenomenon. That's true.  There are various hypotheses, but none of them are sufficient to explain the result.  That is typical for most unsolved problems. In short, the word emergence is a placeholder to be replaced

Aw: [PEIRCE-L] The Role of Semiotics in Life

2021-08-03 Thread Helmut Raulien
  John, List   Yes! Like a weasel! Anyway I didn´t understand, what is wrong with a weasel. I propose it for mascot. Ok, only this thread´s one.   03. August 2021 um 22:18 Uhr  "John F. Sowa" wrote:   Helmut>  "Emergence" for me seems to be a not yet logically fully explained phenomenon.

Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Role of Semiotics in Life

2021-08-03 Thread Edwina Taborsky
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; }John, Helmut, Jon, list I must admit that I'm baffled over the various comments about the use of the term 'emergence'. I am obviously missing some nuance of meaning! All it means in my reference

Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Role of Semiotics in Life

2021-08-03 Thread John F. Sowa
Edwina> All [the word emergence] means in my reference is 'coming into being'; i.e., becoming a morphology, a form, whether in the mode of being of  1ns,2ns,3ns. Yes.  That is all it means.  Jon A called it a 'weasel word' as a sign of deprecation because it names a phenomenon without

[PEIRCE-L] The Role of Semiotics in Life

2021-08-03 Thread Edwina Taborsky
Jerry, list Thanks - very nice post .Much better description than mine - it's what I was trying to say. Heteropathy..".this transformation of matter into novel forms with semantic attributes UNRELATED to the semantic and quantitative attributes of the elements. "

Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Role of Semiotics in Life

2021-08-03 Thread John F. Sowa
Edwina, I agree with you.  The question of how life emerged is important, and it's important to explore all the possible ways in which it might have emerged on earth and on other planets or moons in the solar system, galaxy, or universe. I also implied that Peirce would have approved of the

Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Role of Semiotics in Life

2021-08-03 Thread Edwina Taborsky
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; }John, list No-one is denying that 'emergence' is only the beginning of a complex study. But, as with any situation in the phaneron, what we observe is, so to speak', 'what we observe' - and we have to

Aw: [PEIRCE-L] The Role of Semiotics in Life

2021-08-03 Thread Helmut Raulien
John, Edwina, Jon A., List   "Emergence" for me seems to be a not yet logically fully explained phenomenon. My temporal assumption (not belief, in which I don´t believe) is, that it is individuation and downscaling. Meaning for the example of emergence of life, the universe is a living organism

Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Role of Semiotics in Life

2021-08-03 Thread John F. Sowa
Edwina, Helmut, Jon A, List, The term 'weasel word' for emergence has negative connotations.  I wouldn't suggest the negativity, but I admit that it hides a wide range of interpretants that deserve to be analyzed in more detail. I agree that the early stages of interpretation are so rapid