List,
1- Gary F. has just validated the quote-cookie principle! You take a quote,
you choose in another context a compatible piece of another quote, and you
get a new quote that will produce the new meaning you want. It's a metaphor
of how messenger RNA works, which modifying the Spike protein (a
List:
> On Aug 9, 2021, at 5:57 AM, JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY
> wrote:
>
> Well mathematics is much more homogenous than other languages or sign-systems
> but whilst mathematical truths are universal, existing whatever
> language/method one uses, the manner of reaching those truths can surely
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Robert, List
I agree; your post leads me to ask again - what is the point of De
Tienne's 'argument' against mathematics?
There is no question that we all agree that 'phaneroscopy does not
provide
Bernard, thank you for a thoughtful post (and thanks to Jon S for an equally
thoughtful reply to it). I especially appreciate your tacit acknowledgement of
the emotional basis of your own response to De Tienne’s choice of language at
“the starting point in slide 23.” But my own response will be
Next Wednesday, August 11 at 4pm CET
Yale Weiss (CUNY) will present the talk
"A Reinterpretation of the Semilattice Semantics with Applications"
in the Logica Universalis Webinar
https://www.springer.com/journal/11787/updates/18988758
JYB
Organizer of LUW and President of LUA
John Alan , List
Jon Alan, not being a crusader against ADT, I am much less interested in
ADT's confusion than if he could explain (i.e. state more clearly, make
more intelligible) "these essential principles of mathematics" in such a
way that one can distinguish clearly what kind of mathematics
Jon AS, Gary F, List,
JAS: the question is simply whether
Peirce ever explicitly states that
"mathematics is the universe
of all possibilities." If not, then nobody
can definitively
claim that this is what he intended.
The assumption that
mathematics specifies all of what Peirce called
"real
Gary F., List:
I likewise remain puzzled by the persistent claims that André (or anyone
else) is somehow "arguing against mathematics," especially with
over-the-top language about an alleged "phaneroscopy vaccine against the
mathematics virus." After all, he states plainly in slide 21 that
John, List:
JFS: The first sentence is inconsistent with the quotations cited in the
middle of that paragraph.
On the contrary, it is important to read very carefully how Peirce
describes the constituents of each Universe, especially (in this context)
the first one.
CSP: "Idea" ... denotes
Cf: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Comment 2
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/08/10/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-comment-2/
Re: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Comment 1
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/08/09/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-comment-1/
All,
Definitions
send test _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu
with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the
I uploaded a preliminary version of my slides for tomorrow's talk at
http://jfsowa.com/talks/uql.pdf
I'll post an updated version this
evening or tomorrow morning at the same URL.
For further
information, see the announcement below by Ken Baclawski.
John
--
This is a reminder
12 matches
Mail list logo
