Cf: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Comment 2 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/08/10/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-comment-2/
Re: Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • Comment 1 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/08/09/semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-comment-1/ All, Definitions tend to call on other terms in need of their own definitions, and so on till the process terminates at the level of primitive terms. The main two concepts requiring supplementation in Peirce's definition of a sign relation are the ideas of “correspondence” and “determination”. We can figure out fairly well what Peirce had in mind from things he wrote elsewhere, as I explained in the Sign Relation article I added to Wikipedia 15 years ago. Sign Relation https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sign_relation&oldid=68541642 Not daring to look at what's left of that, here's the relevant section from the OEIS Wiki fork. Sign Relation ( https://oeis.org/wiki/Sign_relation ) • Definition ( https://oeis.org/wiki/Sign_relation#Definition ) Regards, Jon
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
