Post : Peirce's 1870 “Logic Of Relatives” • Comment 11.19
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2014/05/29/peirces-1870-logic-of-relatives-%e2%80%a2-comment-11-19/
Posted : May 29, 2014 at 5:00 pm
Author : Jon Awbrey
Peircers,
Up to this point in the 1870 Logic of Relatives, Peirce has introduced
the
Dear Soren, Charles, List:
First, your post on your beliefs about the CSP and religion was, indeed, a very
thoughtful post. We concur on many points of view here.
Next, with regard to Aristotle and the general notion of categorical approaches
to philosophy and to philosophy of science (not th
Sungchul Ji wanted to share this with you:
Hi,
Sheldrake's biological theory is rooted in Peirce's theory of habits. One
support for his theory may come from my recent findings that the blackbody
radiation-like equation (BRE) (also called 'generalized Planck equation', GPE,
or the 'Planck dist
Dear Jerry
I have just made a library loan of a book that seems rare in paper but can be
bought electronically, which looks very good: Demetra Sfendoni-Mentzou (ed)
2000. Aristotle and Contemporary Science, Vol one, Peter Lang. With
introduction by Hillary Putnam and a chapter by Nicolescu and
Dear Gary and list
I am glad that you accept my integrative view here. It took me a long time to
reach it and many of my colleagues finds it highly provocative.
Peirce's anthropomorphism I would interpret -without having any other sources -
as his abductive epistemology based on evolution and s
Charles,
I can't offer a very cogent comment on your post because I have read neither
Smyth nor Kees' paper that you mention, but after reading part 9.4 of the
book again I'd like to flag a couple of the background issues.
One is the relation between personhood and individuality. According to
Pei
Well said Gary. I am currently going through the KJV which is a sort of
priestly effort to turn anthropomorphic influence into a brief for
arbitrary and often cruel transcendentalism. When all is said and done we
live in the immanent frame and are responsible both to ourselves and to the
creation a
List, Charles:
A brief comment on:
On May 27, 2014, at 3:08 PM, charles murray wrote:
> Clarity about Peirce's view of this matter is especially important to me
> because I take seriously Smyth's insistence that minds are introduced as
> theoretical entities which have no power of efficient cau
A marvelous study of Peirces integration of science and religion, Søren!
I wonder if you might comment, from your perspective, on one aspect of
Peirces religious belief which appears relatively conservative to most of
us: his avowed anthropormorphism. Although Peirce does not see this as
Soren -
I would appreciate help from you, as emcee of chapter nine, in
initiating a response to my post from two days ago (forwarded below).
I am happy to revise its form/simplify its content if you feel that is
indicated.
All best,
Charles Murray
Begin forwarded message:
From: charle
10 matches
Mail list logo
