On 12/17/2018 4:30 PM, g...@gnusystems.ca wrote:
Possibly what I’m saying here is not much different from what you meant,
Yes. We mostly agree on the issues with some variations in terminology.
When I said "The categories of 1ns, 2ns, 3ns are ways of classifying
experiences in the
Gary F., List:
This is probably another case where we get into trouble by switching among
different manuscripts, which Peirce may have intentionally written from
different points of view. Below I was referring specifically to his use of
"entelechy" in "New Elements," which I quoted accordingly.
John, you wrote:
“The categories of 1ns, 2ns, 3ns are ways of classifying experiences in the
phaneron, not the physical things that caused the experiences.” I think this
calls for some clarification.
The idea that physical things cause experiences is a metaphysical one, and in
phaneroscopy,
Jon, you wrote that “As for Entelechy, Peirce quite explicitly associated that
term (as well as the perfect sign) with the ideal end of semiosis--that toward
which growth is proceeding, not the process of growth itself.”
I can’t agree with you there. For one thing, I don’t see how entelechy can
The basic idea of a World Logic Day
is to put logic in its right place, i.e the first place:
1st World Logic Day, January 14, 2019:
http://www.logica-universalis.org/wld
-
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message.