Fra: John Collier [colli...@ukzn.ac.za]
Sendt: 24. januar 2016 19:07
Til: Robert Eckert; peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Emne: RE: [PEIRCE-L] Thirdness, coupling and merging
OK, Robert. That puts a somewhat different light on it, since the issue is then
an empirical one rather
ersity of KwaZulu-Natal
>
> http://web.ncf.ca/collier
>
>
>
> *From:* Robert Eckert [mailto:recke...@mail.naz.edu]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 20 January 2016 1:49 AM
> *To:* peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
> *Subject:* [PEIRCE-L] Thirdness, coupling and merging
>
>
>
> D
: Robert Eckert [mailto:recke...@mail.naz.edu]
Sent: Sunday, 24 January 2016 6:21 PM
To: John Collier; peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Thirdness, coupling and merging
John, List,
What I am suggesting is that the same triadic neurophysiological synthesizing
mechanism accounts
John Collier
Professor Emeritus and Senior Research Associate
University of KwaZulu-Natal
http://web.ncf.ca/collier
From: Frederik Stjernfelt [mailto:stj...@hum.ku.dk]
Sent: Wednesday, 20 January 2016 1:25 PM
To: John Collier; Robert Eckert; peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L
Supplement: This is leading astray from the topic, I think, so dont necessarily answer! I try to finish by answering myself: One cannot even say, if a person is good/wise or dangerous: Eg. Martin Luther is regarded for good and wise by many, but the farmers who had followed Thomas
Jon,
I like this interpretation very much. am always baffled to see, how at all times, in antique times as well as medieval and nowadays, there is a lot of wisdom in theology, like parables, and like this example: Peircean thoughts long before Peirce. On the other hand- well, everybody knows,
gt;,
"peirce-l@list.iupui.edu<mailto:peirce-l@list.iupui.edu>"
<peirce-l@list.iupui.edu<mailto:peirce-l@list.iupui.edu>>
Emne: RE: [PEIRCE-L] Thirdness, coupling and merging
I was thinking about Frederik’s work when I composed my answer. I think this is
a further reason
ier <colli...@ukzn.ac.za>
> Dato: torsdag den 21. januar 2016 10.46
> Til: Frederik Stjernfelt <stj...@hum.ku.dk>, Robert Eckert <
> recke...@mail.naz.edu>, "peirce-l@list.iupui.edu" <peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
> >
> Emne: RE: [PEIRCE-L] Thirdness, couplin
Til: Robert Eckert <recke...@mail.naz.edu<mailto:recke...@mail.naz.edu>>,
"peirce-l@list.iupui.edu<mailto:peirce-l@list.iupui.edu>"
<peirce-l@list.iupui.edu<mailto:peirce-l@list.iupui.edu>>
Emne: RE: [PEIRCE-L] Thirdness, coupling and merging
Inte
Dear list,
Is it possible that Peirce's thirdness, Percy's coupling and Chomsky's
merging are the same?
Could this bringing together, symbolization, merging, of two other things,
explain our language ability?
If so, this basic exemplification in diagrammatic form defines humans.
: [PEIRCE-L] Thirdness, coupling and merging
Dear list,
Is it possible that Peirce's thirdness, Percy's coupling and Chomsky's merging
are the same?
Could this bringing together, symbolization, merging, of two other things,
explain our language ability?
If so, this basic exemplification
11 matches
Mail list logo