Re: Chirality (was Re: [PEIRCE-L] Lowell Lecture 3.4)

Kirsti, John, List: I was stunned by your response! > On Dec 31, 2017, at 9:56 AM, kirst...@saunalahti.fi wrote: > > Jerry, list, > > JERRY: > "Exactly what CSP means by "corpuscular philosophy" is a mystery to me. > Was he arguing for the Boscowitz atoms derived from vortices?" > > > No

Re: Chirality (was Re: [PEIRCE-L] Lowell Lecture 3.4)

Jerry, list, JERRY: "Exactly what CSP means by "corpuscular philosophy" is a mystery to me. Was he arguing for the Boscowitz atoms derived from vortices?" No mystery to me what CSP meant with "corpuscular philosphy". - The problem with your question lies in "Exactly what..." - It (logically )

Aw: Re: Chirality (was Re: [PEIRCE-L] Lowell Lecture 3.4)

Jerry, List, I guess, that the union of units that unifies the unity is something different from a part-whole-affair, that is something that can sufficiently be depicted with a Venn-diagram. I think your saying of union of units fits better to real nature or phenomena than the

Re: Chirality (was Re: [PEIRCE-L] Lowell Lecture 3.4)

List, Helmut: > On Dec 22, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Helmut Raulien wrote: > > I can imagine, that there are simple relations that donot have parts, but > there are also composed relations, that consist of other relations, which are > their parts (given that I may use the term

Re: Chirality (was Re: [PEIRCE-L] Lowell Lecture 3.4)

List, John: > On Dec 19, 2017, at 10:10 PM, John F Sowa wrote: > > Jerry, > > Your discussion and references about chirality are convincing. > But they go beyond issues that Peirce would have known in his day. > I think that he was using issues about chirality as examples >

Re: Chirality (was Re: [PEIRCE-L] Lowell Lecture 3.4)

Jerry, Your discussion and references about chirality are convincing. But they go beyond issues that Peirce would have known in his day. I think that he was using issues about chirality as examples for making a stronger claim: For example, in his lecture on phenomenology, (EP2, 159), ends with

Chirality (was Re: [PEIRCE-L] Lowell Lecture 3.4)

List, John: The issue of chirality is a critical issue in scientific philosophy. The logic of chirality is vastly more perplex than the simple logic of mathematics or physics because it is necessary to invoke the logic of multiple scientific symbol systems in a coherent manner such that the