Thanks Ben,
It is a little difficult to assess matters since I have been focusing on the NLC and you are looking more broadly at the corpus. You say you do it differently. Nevertheless,I will try to locate a problem area.
You say,
"The disparity of Peirce's approaches to (1) attribution
Folks,Pardon me if this has been brought up before, but does anyone know if Daniel Dennett's Heterophenomenology, which maintains that all subjective states are ultimately objective states, is influence by Peirce or if this is even something similar to Peirce's view?
Thanks for any comments...--
Thank you Joe, that is helpful - I will have to get myself an electronic version of the CP.This clears up my concern regarding the term "unity" - he is using the definition that he gives to Kant's usage.CP 6.378 (1901) from "Unity and Plurality" in Baldwin's Dictionary 378. Unity is divided by
My firm response is that I do not see how it could be.With respect,StevenOn Sep 7, 2006, at 5:04 PM, R Jeffrey Grace wrote:Folks,Pardon me if this has been brought up before, but does anyone know if Daniel Dennett's Heterophenomenology, which maintains that all subjective states are ultimately
Jim, list,
[Jim Wilgoose] It is a little difficult to assess matters since I have
been focusing on the NLC and you are looking more broadly at the corpus. You say
you do it differently. Nevertheless,I will try to locate a problem
area.
[Jim] You say,
[Ben] The disparity of Peirce's
Oh well hell, Steve! You have burst my bubble! (Sorry... I'll get serious now...)It struck me as Peirceian because, if I'm not mistaken, Peirce denied that there was such a thing as introspection. He also seemed to affirm the idea that individuals are less real than generality... or rather that
