Re: Scientific inquiry does not involve matters "of vital importance," was, [PEIRCE-L] A footnote on reason

Thanks, Gary R and Kirsti, for your comments, I’m just catching up. Regarding the potential for catastrophe, Gary R. stated, “that you would, however, find it difficult to find in Peirce very much support for your thesis.” Perhaps, though Peirce provided support for that thesis in the same essay,

[PEIRCE-L] Scientific inquiry does not involve matters

BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; }Gene, list: With regard to your comments, see below: On Mon 12/03/18 12:59 PM , Eugene Halton eugene.w.halto...@nd.edu sent: Thanks, Gary R and Kirsti, for your comments, I’m just catching up. 1] Regard

[PEIRCE-L] APA Pacific Meeting Author Meets Critics: From the Axial Age to the Moral Revolution

For anyone who might be interested, who will be at the American Philosophic Association Pacific meeting in San Diego at the end of this month. There will be an author meets critics session sponsored by the Karl Jaspers Society of North America, which will discuss my book, From the Axial

Re: [PEIRCE-L] APA Pacific Meeting Author Meets Critics: From the Axial Age to the Moral Revolution

Gene, list, Congratulations Gene! I wish I could attend that APA meeting. Your book From the Axial Age to the Moral Revolution: John Stuart-Glennie, Karl Jaspers, and a New Understanding of the Idea (New York: Palgrave MacMillan) is quite extraord

Re: Scientific inquiry does not involve matters "of vital importance," was, [PEIRCE-L] A footnote on reason

Gene, Edwina, Kirsti, list Gene wrote: EH: Regarding the potential for catastrophe, Gary R. stated, “that you would, however, find it difficult to find in Peirce very much support for your thesis.” The potential for catastrophe (regarding which I fully agree with you) was not the 'thesis' that

Aw: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Perfect Sign Revisited

Dear Jerry, List, I think, esthetics is 1ns, logic 2ns, and ethics 3ns (Quality or feeling // reaction // mediation). This way, logic would imply esthetics, as 1ns of 2ns (2.1.): Does the logic feel beautiful or ugly. Ethics would be an interpretant too, becoming a sign (1ns) again, so ethics is

Re: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Perfect Sign Revisited

Dear Helmut, list, I’m glad you think so. Please consult the list of criteria to ensure that your conception passes the test of universality. If not, please modify accordingly. Best, Jerry R As Peirce concludes, “an aim which cannot be adopted and consistently pursued is a bad aim. It c