In exactly two months will start in Vichy, France the
6th School on Universal Logic
http://www.uni-log.org/ULS6
This is a 5-day school with 30 tutorials on all aspects of logic
(historical, philosophical, mathematical, computational)
given by scholars from all over the world.
The school will start
To speak of good as prior to logic is perhaps wrong. I claim logic is good.
Good is only prior to logic in the sense that it represents what
metaphysics used to see as the end of things. I see dualisms as eliminated
by triadic thought. So, for example, metaphysics and logic coexist
triadically. Der
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}John - what's the difference between a 'language game' and a
'grammatical sentence'?
Thanks
Edwina
On Mon 16/04/18 12:05 AM , John F Sowa s...@bestweb.net sent:
Jerry, Stephen, and Helmut,
In his late
Edwina and Stephen,
ET
what's the difference between a 'language game' and
a 'grammatical sentence'?
A sentence is just one move in a language game.
For more about Wittgenstein's language games and their relationship
to logic and computer programs, see the article "Language Games,
Natural and
Stephen, John:
> On Apr 14, 2018, at 11:57 AM, Stephen C. Rose wrote:
>
> Words, as noted, are often a frail reed but they have a purpose.
This is a very clever phrase; I like it very much.
Do you think that all of academic philosophy (not just the ones that post here)
uses all words in this
There's a lot beyond what you have said that is suggestive. But I will say
just two things. If I was starting from scratch I would recognize a
division between any contrived or explicit or mathematical or scientific
language that is logically consistent and what I would call normal language
or some
John, my reply to Jerry sort of thoughts on the idea of two logics.
Unfortunately, I replied first to Jerry and managed to lose your note to
which I was going to reply. I have been online forever but have no idea
what happened.
Here is a bit that may explain what I am about.
Reality is all.
All
Dear Stephen, list,
Your words are lovely.
But pray tell, would you accept the following assertion as one that
pragmaticists would boast themselves to be?
*'the holdings of a person are just if he is entitled to them by the
principles of justice in acquisition and transfer .. .'?*
With
Dear Stephen, list,
Thanks for that clear response,
With best wishes,
Jerry R
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 1:47 PM, Stephen C. Rose
wrote:
> Absolutely. The words are from my Kindle book Tractatus which is clearly
> related to Wittgenstein.
>
> amazon.com/author/stephenrose
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018
Stephen and Jerry LRC,
I changed the subject line of this note to replace "related systems"
with "Musement", which is closer to the word 'Spiel' in Wittgenstein's
'Sprachspiel' than to the word 'game' in 'language game'.
Stephen, if you lost my previous note, just look at the copy that is
includ
John, list,
You wrote:
"
HR
> graphs, as most mathematic symbol language too, does not symbolize
> time (continuity)? But: Might it not be possible to do that, by
> inventing symbols for time and its flow?
Scientists use the symbol 't' and predicates spelled T-I-M-E in
mathematics. Th
On 4/16/2018 5:33 PM, Helmut Raulien wrote:
Maybe temporality, that what distinguishes "t" from "x,y,z",
is the essence of mind?
I think we've exhausted most of the issues.
If you want one word, I'd say semeiotic.
John
-
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List
Theme One • A Program Of Inquiry : 13
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2018/04/16/theme-one-%e2%80%a2-a-program-of-inquiry-13/
Peircers,
The abstract character of the cactus language relative
to its logical interpretations makes it possible to give
abstract rules of equivalence for transforming one
13 matches
Mail list logo
