Gary F., List:
This is probably another case where we get into trouble by switching among
different manuscripts, which Peirce may have intentionally written from
different points of view. Below I was referring specifically to his use of
"entelechy" in "New Elements," which I quoted accordingly.
On 12/17/2018 4:30 PM, g...@gnusystems.ca wrote:
Possibly what I’m saying here is not much different from what you meant,
Yes. We mostly agree on the issues with some variations in terminology.
When I said "The categories of 1ns, 2ns, 3ns are ways of classifying
experiences in the
Jon, you wrote that “As for Entelechy, Peirce quite explicitly associated that
term (as well as the perfect sign) with the ideal end of semiosis--that toward
which growth is proceeding, not the process of growth itself.”
I can’t agree with you there. For one thing, I don’t see how entelechy can
John, you wrote:
“The categories of 1ns, 2ns, 3ns are ways of classifying experiences in the
phaneron, not the physical things that caused the experiences.” I think this
calls for some clarification.
The idea that physical things cause experiences is a metaphysical one, and in
phaneroscopy,
The basic idea of a World Logic Day
is to put logic in its right place, i.e the first place:
1st World Logic Day, January 14, 2019:
http://www.logica-universalis.org/wld
-
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message.
