[peirce-l] Re: Peirce and Prigogine

2006-04-19 Thread Jeffrey
Victoria, I wonder if it's necessary to chart changes in Peirce's view throughout his career. For example, what do you think are the implications of this statement (from the Harvard 1903 lectures) for final causation: The Universe as an argument is necessarily a great work of art, a great po

[peirce-l] Re: Entelechy

2006-05-09 Thread Jeffrey
Gene, I wonder if you can comment a bit more on the end of your note--how exactly does it make sense from a Peircean point of view to claim that poems are arguments? More specifically, if poems qua aesthetic objects partake most of firstness, how can they also be arguments? Jeff -Origina

[peirce-l] Peirce Plays and Short Stories

2006-05-19 Thread Jeffrey
I've seen references in various places to the fact that Peirce wrote short stories and plays throughout his life--does anyone know where these are held? Are they among the Harvard materials, and have any of them been published? Jeff Hipolito --- Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archiv

[peirce-l] Dennett

2006-09-07 Thread R Jeffrey Grace
y comments...-- ---   R. Jeffrey Grace   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.rjgrace.com --- Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com

[peirce-l] Re: Dennett

2006-09-07 Thread R Jeffrey Grace
erophenomenology...the idea that an objective observer might be able to read someone's subjective experience better than the subject him/herself. On 9/7/06, Steven Ericsson-Zenith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My firm response is that I do not see how it could be.With respect,Steven On Sep 7,

[peirce-l] Re: Dennett

2006-09-08 Thread R Jeffrey Grace
ver might be able to read someone's subjective experience better than the subject him/herself. On 9/7/06, Steven Ericsson-Zenith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My firm response is that I do not see how it could be. With respect, Steven On Sep 7, 2006, at 5:04 PM,

[peirce-l] Re: Dennett

2006-09-08 Thread R Jeffrey Grace
Thanks, Jim!  On 9/8/06, Jim Piat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jeffrey Grace wrote:   >>It struck me as Peirceian because, if I'm not mistaken, Peirce denied that there was such a thing as "introspection".  He also seemed to affirm the idea that individuals are

[peirce-l] Re: Dennett

2006-09-08 Thread R Jeffrey Grace
On 9/8/06, Steven Ericsson-Zenith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear Jeffrey and Jim,I do not believe that comparing theories by abstracting their general statements about reality is sufficient.  Steven, good point... and I agree.   I don't think such a comparison is sufficient but I do