[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/18/04 5:23 PM
Michael wrote:
i've a hunch that some left interest in nader is reflection of
absence of actual left alternatives, as panelist at forum i attended
in ann arbor said yesterday: 'he's best known option, lousy way to
develop actual left alternative...
I think
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/18/04 3:46 PM
http://www.swans.com/
July 19, 2004 -- In this issue:
http://www.swans.com/library/art10/lproy17.html
The Case for Nader-Camejo
- by Louis Proyect
Unlike the DLC-backed candidates of recent years, Nader is not afraid to
represent himself as an old-fashioned
Michael Hoover wrote:
another panelist referred with reverence to eugene debs, well i dig debs
too but real importance at that time was neither his 6% of prez vote in
1912 or million votes he got in 1920 while in prison, more significant
was over 1300 - mostly local - elected socialists prior to
Michael wrote:
i've a hunch that some left interest in nader is reflection of
absence of actual left alternatives, as panelist at forum i attended
in ann arbor said yesterday: 'he's best known option, lousy way to
develop actual left alternative...
I think that those who are seriously interested
Michael wrote:
i've a hunch that some left interest in nader is reflection of absence
of actual left alternatives, as panelist at forum i attended in ann
arbor said yesterday: 'he's best known option, lousy way to develop
actual left alternative...
I think that those who are seriously
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/18/04 4:33 PM
Michael Hoover wrote:
another panelist referred with reverence to eugene debs, well i dig
debs
too but real importance at that time was neither his 6% of prez vote
in
1912 or million votes he got in 1920 while in prison, more significant
was over 1300 -
I've stay out of this discussion, to everybody's relief (and my own), but is
it possible that anyone can really endorse voting for a national Democratic
candidate as progressive, or even the lesser evil?
I guess so, but it takes a complete disavowal of history to do so. It takes
a deliberate
In a message dated 7/18/2004 5:05:30 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've stay out of
this discussion, to everybody's relief (and my own), but is it possible that
anyone can really endorse voting for a national Democratic candidate as
progressive, or even the lesser
In a message dated 7/18/2004 4:33:01 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Response Jim C: "The people who cast the votes decide
nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything." (Josef Stalin)
Comment
This is true and how it playsitself out in real life and
sartesian wrote:
I've stay out of this discussion, to everybody's relief (and my own), but is
it possible that anyone can really endorse voting for a national Democratic
candidate as progressive, or even the lesser evil?
I guess so, but it takes a complete disavowal of history to do so. It
10 matches
Mail list logo
