In a message dated 9/10/00 11:33:44 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So the claim that "we always will" - i.e.
that "in other instances" the repetition, the expectation and the belief
will be conjoined - cannot be justified
Of coutrse it can't. If it could, then there
Hume would say, more constant conjunction is what you have--here, the CC of
the bell with the CC of the two other things. --jks
In a message dated 9/10/00 12:13:21 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I give up. What would Hume say? The bell is warning you that constant
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 12:46 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:1621] Re: Re: Re: Re: Hume the Postmodern Grin without
a...
Hume would say, more constant conjunction is what you have--here, the CC
of
the bell with the CC of the two other things. --jks
In a message dated 9/10/00 4:10:24 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
ustin wrote:
In a message dated 9/10/00 11:33:44 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So the claim that "we always will" - i.e.
that "in other instances" the repetition, the
Ken Hanly wrote:
Reason is not capable of really questioning
induction since reason is powerless against such a natural instinct.
How then is Hume able to question induction?
Ted
--
Ted WinslowE-MAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Division of Social Science VOICE:
Ted Winslow wrote:
Ken Hanly wrote:
Reason is not capable of really questioning
induction since reason is powerless against such a natural instinct.
How then is Hume able to question induction?
This reason/passion/[appetite] metaphysics had its origins in Plato's
attack on Athenian
He doesn't really. He questions justifications of it.
Cheers, Ken Hanly
- Original Message -
From: Ted Winslow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2000 2:07 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:1562] Re: Re: Re: Re: Hume the Postmodern Grin without
aCat(was Re
At 03:31 PM 09/09/2000 -0500, you wrote:
Going down the road of hyperbolic
doubt gets you to the malevolent demon and deep questions about whether we
might not all be brains in vats. I doubt these questions are of great
practical use as preparation for socialist revolution.
Isn't that the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2000 4:03 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:1573] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hume the Postmodern Grin
without aCat(was Re: pomoistas)
At 03:31 PM 09/09/2000 -0500, you wrote:
Going down the road of hyperbolic
doubt gets you to the malevolent
In a message dated 9/9/00 3:15:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Ken Hanly wrote:
Reason is not capable of really questioning
induction since reason is powerless against such a natural instinct.
How then is Hume able to question induction?
Ken misspeaks,
10 matches
Mail list logo
