Re: Re: New risk rules of FI's

2001-01-23 Thread ALI KADRI

According to a colleague who contributes to the
writing of these agreements, the 1988 agreement gave
ample considerations to Japanese banking needs.
Japanese banks at the time had much capital gains and
so the agreement allowed them to convert 40% of
capital gains into permanent capital. This of course,
on the balance sheet between assets (permanent capital
being a part of that) and liabilities, would lesen the
risk; but always according to my colleague who is, by
the way, the Guru of banking arrangments, the banks'
ties to the japanese stock market and its decline, in
combination with bad loans at high tide a la Minsky, 
had more to do with the problems of japanese banks
than did the basel agreement.. then again, my
colleague is a principal contributor to these
agreements. In any case balance sheet thinking to an
economist should be treated like a virus, if one waits
it goes away be itself, so hic rhodus, hic salta.  
--- Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 I have read accounts to the effect that the
 inability to comply with the
 Basel agreement was what did in the Japanese banks. 
 I wonder what the
 consequences would be of this new policy.
  -- 
 Michael Perelman
 Economics Department
 California State University
 Chico, CA 95929
 
 Tel. 530-898-5321
 E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. 
http://auctions.yahoo.com/




Free Mike!

2001-01-23 Thread Doug Henwood

Today's Feed daily is my plea to Free Mike Milken! 
http://www.feedmag.com/templates/select_template.php3?a_id=1581.

Doug




Re: Energy deregulation GATS

2001-01-23 Thread Jim Devine

It seems to me that Governor Gray Davis has a easy solution to the current 
energy crunch, which seems to have shut pen-l down for awhile: he could 
allow electricity retail prices to rise, while allowing California 
consumers to write off electricity costs on their state income taxes this 
year. (The latter is possible because the state government is running a 
budget surplus.)  This is not the best solution, but it would work, perhaps 
to give breathing room to allow a better solution. Gene, what do you think?

At 05:49 PM 1/22/01 -0800, you wrote:

The Globe and Mail  January
22, 2001

U.S. touts California-style power plan

 By Barrie McKenna

SAN FRANCISCO -- The U.S. government is pushing California-
style power deregulation on the rest of the world even as the state's
controversial electricity free market experiment continues to unravel
at home.
 Just weeks before Californians were hit with the first power
blackouts since the Second World War, the United States was
quietly lobbying in Geneva to convince Canada and other U.S.
trading partners that electricity deregulation should be an integral
part of a proposed free trade in services deal.

Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine




RE: bankruptcy and corporate auditing

2001-01-23 Thread Charles Brown


Dave,

Wouldn't it have been better by your analysis to let that big hedge fund go bankrupt 
recently, like normal capitalism ?

Charles Brown




RE: Re: Energy deregulation GATS

2001-01-23 Thread Max Sawicky

problem is a lot of folks pay little or no income
tax but still pay utility bills.

mbs


It seems to me that Governor Gray Davis has a easy solution to the current
energy crunch, which seems to have shut pen-l down for awhile: he could
allow electricity retail prices to rise, while allowing California
consumers to write off electricity costs on their state income taxes this
year. (The latter is possible because the state government is running a
budget surplus.)  This is not the best solution, but it would work, perhaps
to give breathing room to allow a better solution. Gene, what do you think?

At 05:49 PM 1/22/01 -0800, you wrote:

The Globe and Mail  January
22, 2001

U.S. touts California-style power plan

 By Barrie McKenna

SAN FRANCISCO -- The U.S. government is pushing California-
style power deregulation on the rest of the world even as the state's
controversial electricity free market experiment continues to unravel
at home.
 Just weeks before Californians were hit with the first power
blackouts since the Second World War, the United States was
quietly lobbying in Geneva to convince Canada and other U.S.
trading partners that electricity deregulation should be an integral
part of a proposed free trade in services deal.

Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine




Re: RE: Re: Energy deregulation GATS

2001-01-23 Thread Jim Devine

then, make it a refundable tax credit, or lower the state sales tax further.

At 11:55 AM 1/23/01 -0500, you wrote:
problem is a lot of folks pay little or no income
tax but still pay utility bills.

mbs


It seems to me that Governor Gray Davis has a easy solution to the current
energy crunch, which seems to have shut pen-l down for awhile: he could
allow electricity retail prices to rise, while allowing California
consumers to write off electricity costs on their state income taxes this
year. (The latter is possible because the state government is running a
budget surplus.)  This is not the best solution, but it would work, perhaps
to give breathing room to allow a better solution. Gene, what do you think?

At 05:49 PM 1/22/01 -0800, you wrote:

 The Globe and Mail  January
 22, 2001
 
 U.S. touts California-style power plan
 
  By Barrie McKenna
 
 SAN FRANCISCO -- The U.S. government is pushing California-
 style power deregulation on the rest of the world even as the state's
 controversial electricity free market experiment continues to unravel
 at home.
  Just weeks before Californians were hit with the first power
 blackouts since the Second World War, the United States was
 quietly lobbying in Geneva to convince Canada and other U.S.
 trading partners that electricity deregulation should be an integral
 part of a proposed free trade in services deal.

Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine

Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine




BLS Daily Report

2001-01-23 Thread Richardson_D

BLS DAILY REPORT, MONDAY, JANUARY 22, 2001

Regional and state unemployment rates were steady in December with all four
regions reporting little or no change and 43 states recording changes of
less than 0.3 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports. ...  (Daily
Labor Report, page D-8).

The Wall Street Journal's graph "Tracking the Economy" forecasts that the
Employment Cost Index for the Fourth Quarter, to be released Thursday, will
be up 1.1 percent, according to the Thomson Global Forecast.  The previous
quarter's increase was 0.9 percent. 

The U.S. trade deficit in goods and services narrowed 1.7 percent in
November, as imports declined more than exports, the Commerce Department
says.  This was the second month in a row that the deficit posted an
improvement. ...  (Daily Labor Report, page D-1)_The U.S. trade deficit
declined in November for a second consecutive  month.  Imports of oil, cars,
and computers fell.  The 2- month decline was the longest since May through
July 1997.  Many economists are predicting a slow improvement in the trade
deficit in 2001, as weaker U.S. economic growth translates into falling
demand for imported goods.  There is also hope that foreign economic growth
will pick up and boost U.S. exports and that the price of oil, a big part of
the import bill, will stabilize. ...  (Washington Post, Jan. 20, page E1;
New York Times, Jan. 20, page B3)_The U.S. trade deficit shrank in
November, reflecting a slowdown in the economy and offering further proof
that U.S. consumer demand is cooling off.  Indeed, consumer demand is
slowing globally.  U.S. imports had the biggest decline in a decade.  But
exports, for the third month in a row, slowed as well, indicating activity
overseas is drying up. ...  (Wall Street Journal, page A2).

A plunge in consumer confidence not only leads shoppers to be more cautious,
but also signals manufacturers to slow their assembly lines.  Ford Motor Co.
last month said it would scale back first-quarter North American production
to 1.05 million vehicles from the initial estimate of 1.16 million.  Even
the more optimistic first projection was down from the 1.27 million cars and
trucks produced in the first quarter last year.  A precipitous drop in the
University of Michigan's consumer-sentiment index in mid-December "moved us
from the edge of the radar screen to the bull's eye," said Ford's U.S. sales
analyst manager.  On Friday, the Michigan index dropped again, to a
preliminary January reading of 93.6 from 98.4 in December.  The decline
exceeded market expectations and marks the index's lowest level since the
Asian financial crisis of 1997-98.  In the past 2 months, the index has
fallen 14 points, the sharpest 2-month decline since the last recession. ...
(Wall Street Journal, page A4).

Gasoline consumption in the United States fell about 1 percent last year,
the first decline since 1991 and a rare phenomenon during an economic
expansion, the American Petroleum Institute said.  The institute, the oil
industry's main trade association, also said that demand for all oil
products was about the same in 2000 as in 1999, also unusual during boom
times.  Demand for jet fuel and truck fuel rose, offsetting the decline in
gasoline.  The decline in gasoline consumption apparently resulted from less
driving, because the number of vehicles continued to increase. ...  (New
York Times, Jan. 20, page B1).


 application/ms-tnef


Daily Recession Watch Report

2001-01-23 Thread Charles Brown


Michigan town's pain signals hard times
Cadillac feels first ripples of an economic slowdown




Dale Young / The Detroit News

Jon Anderson of Four Winns rests on a boat mid-assembly line. The plant closed four 
days before Christmas, leaving 500 workers jobless. The company is looking for a new 
owner.

 

By Francis X. Donnelly / The Detroit News

CADILLAC -- This small, blue-collar city in northwest Michigan has the economic 
flu. 
   It began in the outlying strip malls and spread to the factories and workers' 
homes. It's also beginning to infiltrate hotels and restaurants. 

Dale Young / The Detroit News

Solomon Trofatter, manager of Cadillac's pawn shop, says more and more people seek 
fast cash as jobs become scarce.

 

   The source is a slowdown in the national economy. People are buying fewer cars, 
pleasure boats and other items, leading to the making of fewer products. That has 
meant plant closings and layoffs, which could lead to even less buying. 
   Nearly 1,100 workers, a tenth of Cadillac's population, have lost their jobs since 
Christmas. Four Winns boat makers, the city's flagship business, is looking for a new 
owner. Stage, a department store that takes up half a block of downtown, has gone 
bankrupt. 
   The slowing economy is being felt throughout the United States, but is more 
concentrated in Cadillac because of its heavy industrial base. 
   It's easy to follow the consequences as they move from industry to industry 
because, in a city where most businesses are within walking distance, the ripples 
don't have as far to travel. 
   "We're only as good as the economy," Mayor Ron Blanchard said. "If the economy is 
way down, we'll be way down. There's nothing we can do about it." 
   Local merchants have tried to quell residents' fears about the fallout. 
   They know slowdowns are influenced as much by perception as by cold economic 
statistics. 
   That is, people who believe the economy will worsen will spend less, leading to a 
bigger slowdown. 
   But it's tough to mollify a community where so many residents know someone who lost 
a job or is in danger of doing so. The layoffs are Topic A in diners and bars, 
Jennifer Trofatter said. 
   Trofatter helps run the Fast Cash pawn shop, which has been scurrying to keep up 
with customers -- employed and unemployed alike -- looking to trade goods for some 
pocket change. 
   "People are coming in all the time," she said. "Everyone knows someone who's been 
laid off." 
   
Growing with industry 
   Industry has been a part of Cadillac since the city was carved out of dense maple 
and pine in 1874. Its earliest settlers came to work at one of four sawmills on what 
is now Lake Cadillac.  About Cadillac
   Population: 10,107 
   Founded: 1874 
   Main types of industry: Manufacturing, retail and tourism-related 
   Biggest employer: Avon Rubber  Plastics with 892 workers 
   Unemployment rate: 6.6 percent 
   Estimated per capita income: $18,334 
   Source: Cadillac Area Chamber of Commerce 
 
Layoff anxiety

What do you think are the chances that your company will lay off employees this year? 
 Very likely / already have 
About a 50-50 chance 
Not likely 



 
 
   The city, which now surrounds the lake, took its name from Antoine de la Mothe 
Cadillac, the founder of Detroit. 
   That's not the only tie between the two cities, old-timers say. 
   Cadillac has been a steady supplier of rubber products to the auto industry since 
B.F. Goodrich opened a plant here in 1937. The plant helped revive a community whose 
lumber industry was decimated by the Depression. 
   Goodrich moved out of town in 1959 but some workers stayed behind to eventually 
open several rubber companies that became the new mainstay of the community. 
   One of them was James Frisbie. 
   "This was a town where industry had a good chance to succeed," said Frisbie, an 
88-year-old retiree. "The chamber of commerce did a lot to promote industry." 
   The auto rubber industry helped this part of Michigan flourish during the 1990s. 
The population within 25 miles of Cadillac grew 15 percent during the decade, from 
58,747 to 67,395, according to the Census Bureau. 
   Cadillac ran out of places to put the new residents so they spread into the 
surrounding rural communities. 
   Chasing those denizens is a plethora of retail chains. For a small community whose 
closest metro area, Grand Rapids, is 100 miles to the south, Cadillac has a high 
number of retailers. 
   The heaviest concentration is along U.S. 131 just north of Cadillac. The stretch of 
highway boasts several miles of businesses whose variety would rival any part of Metro 
Detroit. 
   "Everything is malls, malls, malls," said Michele Wood, a clerk at the downtown 
Chef's Deli. "This is not a one-horse town anymore." 
   In the past two years, Home Depot, Meijer and Office Depot have opened large stores 
that the locals call "big boxes." 
   The parking lot of the 180,000-square-foot Meijer 

My neighbor, GM, Fortune 500 company

2001-01-23 Thread Charles Brown

World Auto View
Depend on GM for your livelihood? Reasons adding up for you to worry


By Daniel Howes / The Detroit News

 FRANKFURT, Germany--If there are virtually no problems in today's auto industry 
that can't be cured with great cars and trucks, as Nissan President Carlos Ghosn says, 
then those who depend on Detroit's automakers ought to be a little worried. 
   Detroit can, of course, build great products when it wants to. Just look at 
DaimlerChrysler AG's PT Cruiser, General Motors Corp.'s large pickups and Ford Motor 
Co.'s constantly morphing lineup of trucks and sport-utility vehicles. 
   But those successes of the 1990s, trumpeted as evidence that Detroit's renaissance 
was real, are in danger of being overrun. Blame stubbornly high fixed costs, long-term 
labor contracts that stifle flexibility, nagging quality problems (real and perceived) 
and the comfortable tendency to focus on what works (trucks and sport-utes) and limp 
along with the rest. 
   That's Chrysler problem these days. And GM's, too. Yet the constant talk of 
Chrysler's restructuring, due next month, is overshadowing a potentially far larger 
shakeout at GM that would make any change at Chrysler seem mild by comparison. 
   Simply put, the state of GM should worry anyone in Metro Detroit - or the world, 
for that matter - whose livelihood depends on the General for income, contracts or 
charitable support. Sure, it's got a $13.3-billion cash hoard. Yes, it booked profits 
in North America and worldwide. And you can bet that President Rick Wagoner Jr., the 
youngest chief executive in GM history, would not stand by should GM nose-dive. 
   He won't. But it means something when people inside the company tell you privately 
that the last time they were this concerned for their company, former-Chairman Bob 
Stempel and President Lloyd Reuss were running the place. We all know what happened 
next. 
   The argument that a smaller, more profitable GM is preferable to a larger, 
money-losing GM has always made sense. We're now entering a time, however, when the 
slimmer GM is making less money - and claiming less market share - amid fierce attacks 
from its Japanese, German and South Korean rivals. 
   The numbers don't lie. Neither do the reactions to some important products in the 
GM pipeline, the hot Chevrolet SSR and sharp Buick Bengal concept notwithstanding. 
Conventional wisdom holds that GM basically is incapable of generating excitement with 
its new cars and trucks. For once, I agree. 
   You can feel the uneasiness about GM's business prospects in North America and 
Europe, despite bullishness from executives. The Opel lineup for Europe is tired. 
Plans for Saab, the quirky Swedish brand, aren't showing any public signs of movement. 
The edginess of the "new" Cadillac, judging by what we've seen, looks like designs for 
designers - not customers. 
   None of this is comforting. The nascent revolution that Wagoner began by killing 
Oldsmobile and ordering a 10-percent cut in the white-collar workforce should only be 
the beginning. But we don't know if it's more like the end. 
   It can't be. Arch-rival Ford is far better balanced in more segments of the volume 
and luxury markets than GM, thanks to Wolfgang Reitzle's Premier Automotive Group and 
an improving Ford car line-up under Richard Parry-Jones. 
   In response, GM's Wagoner likes to say, "We have what we have." That's the problem. 
Still. 




what is productivity

2001-01-23 Thread Michael Perelman

Sven Larsen posted this to another
list.  The interesting part, for me, is
the subjective nature of what is, or is
not productive -- sort of like the
discussion we had long ago about
measuring GDP.  Economics attempts to
project itself as some sort of objective
science, but 


A Danish woman is before a tax appeals
board today to defend her right
to make a tax deduction for expenses she
had while undertaking a silicon
implant operation. The woman, a strip
danser, can show records she has
doubled her income after the operation.
She also says she had the
implants inserted only to "stay in
business" and "keep up with larger
competition [sic]". Investments in
production equipment or equipment
necessary for one's ability to stay
active on the labor market is
eligible for tax exemption, but the
local tax office denied her implants
tax exempt status with the motivation
that it cannot be ruled out she
will be able to avail herself to her own
pleasure of those implants when
she's off work, which would then be a
disqualifying circumstance. Today,
while presenting her case to the appeals
board, the woman promised she
would give the board a chance to inspect
the results of her
income-enhancing investment, so they can
make their own, unbiased
judgment.

Wonder how the IRS would tackle a case
like this.

/srl
--
Sven R Larson
PhD; Assistant professor of economics
Department of Social Sciences, Bldg.
22.2
Roskilde University
Pb 260

--

Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




question about pen-l contents

2001-01-23 Thread Michael Perelman

In response to my request Bob Naiman is
posting Dean Baker's Economic Reporting
Review.  We've also then getting Paul
Kniesel's antifascist compilation.  My
own thinking is that the latter is a bit
off topic for us, since many people are
concerned about the excessive crush of
pen-l posts.  Maybe you would be best to
reply to me personally regarding this
sort of material so as not to overload
the list.

--

Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Free Mike!

2001-01-23 Thread David Shemano

Milken got screwed.  He was not charged with, and never convicted of,
insider trading.  In fact, I bet there is not a single person on this list
who has a clue what he was charged with and how trivial the charges actually
were.  The fact is he did more to democratize capital than anybody alive and
thereby made some serious enemies, as Dough Henwood's article states.  The
fact that Marc Rich was pardoned and Milken was not is conclusive proof that
Clinton is really as corrupt as he appears.

David Shemano


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Henwood
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 8:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:7187] Free Mike!


Today's Feed daily is my plea to Free Mike Milken!
http://www.feedmag.com/templates/select_template.php3?a_id=1581.

Doug




Re: RE: Free Mike!

2001-01-23 Thread Doug Henwood

David Shemano wrote:

Milken got screwed.  He was not charged with, and never convicted of,
insider trading.  In fact, I bet there is not a single person on this list
who has a clue what he was charged with and how trivial the charges actually
were.

Even more challenging: who were the victims of Milken's "crimes"? 
Don't anyone say "workers," because there are plenty of thoroughly 
legal financial practices that take more out of the hide of workers 
than anything MM ever did.

   The fact is he did more to democratize capital than anybody alive and
thereby made some serious enemies, as Dough Henwood's article states.

I could use some dough. Wanna send some?

-- 

Doug Henwood
Left Business Observer
Village Station - PO Box 953
New York NY 10014-0704 USA
+1-212-741-9852 voice  +1-212-807-9152 fax
email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.panix.com/~dhenwood/LBO_home.html




RE: Re: RE: Free Mike!

2001-01-23 Thread David Shemano

Doug Henwood wrote:

-
Milken got screwed.  He was not charged with, and never convicted of,
insider trading.  In fact, I bet there is not a single person on this list
who has a clue what he was charged with and how trivial the charges
actually
were.

Even more challenging: who were the victims of Milken's "crimes"?
Don't anyone say "workers," because there are plenty of thoroughly
legal financial practices that take more out of the hide of workers
than anything MM ever did.

   The fact is he did more to democratize capital than anybody alive and
thereby made some serious enemies, as Dough Henwood's article states.

I could use some dough. Wanna send some?

---

Here is Milken's website.  Send him an email with your request.  He appears
to be very generous.

http://www.mikemilken.com/index.html

David Shemano




Special Issue #2 On Ashcroft Nomination (#505)

2001-01-23 Thread Paul Kneisel

/=-=-=-=-Click Here  Support Our Sponsor-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=\
Start eWorking! Get benefits and regular paychecks while
working as a freelancer or consultant with eWork Services.
Find your ideal project and declare your independence at:
http://click.topica.com/aaabfIbz8SnrbAjwjxa/eWork
\=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=/

__

 The Internet Anti-Fascist: Sunday, 21 January 2001
   Special Issue #2 On Ashcroft Nomination (#505)
__

  8) webmaster StopJohnAshcroft.org, "Oppose John Ashcroft For Attorney
 General," 11 Jan 01
  9) FAIR, "Southern Partisan: "Setting the Record Straight": Attorney
 general nominee praised white supremacist magazine," 12 Jan 01
10) Joe Conason (New York Observer), "Why Did Ashcroft Try to Help Dr.
 Sell?," 15 Jan 01
11) Joe Conason (Salon), "Ashcroft's tough Sell: A segregationist group is
 banking on the hard-on-crime attorney general nominee to drop a murder
 conspiracy case against one of its own," 16 Jan 01

- - - - -

8) Oppose John Ashcroft For Attorney General
webmaster StopJohnAshcroft.org
11 Jan 01

Dear friend of drug law reform:

As you've probably read in mainstream news accounts, former US Senator John
Ashcroft (R-MO) has been nominated by President- Elect George W. Bush for
the office of Attorney General. DRCNet, as a nonpartisan organization
devoted strictly to drug policy reform, is opposing the Ashcroft nomination
because of his record as one of the most hawkish drug warriors supporting
some of the most extreme drug war legislation during his tenure in the
Senate.  We are writing to ask you to visit a web site we've set up to
encourage grassroots opposition to the Ashcroft nomination --
http://www.StopJohnAshcroft.org -- and to use the information and the
online petitions there to help defeat this nomination while there's still
time.

If drug policy and related Constitutional issues are the criteria, there is
no question that John Ashcroft has one of the worst records on Capitol
Hill.  As Senator, John Ashcroft sponsored a bill that would have
simultaneously violated the spirit if not the letter of both the 1st and
4th amendments to the US Constitution: the "Methamphetamine Anti-
Proliferation Act" would have criminalized certain drug- and drug policy-
related discussions on the Internet, and would have allowed police to
conduct secret searches of homes, with the residents never being informed
before or after that the police were there.  Indeed, in his six years in
the Senate, Ashcroft proposed amendments to the Constitution a full seven
times, including an amendment to make it easier to amend the Constitution.

As Senator, John Ashcroft demonstrated an unwillingness to deal seriously
with the problem of racial disparity in the criminal justice system.  While
outwardly professing support for a bill to study racial profiling, Sen.
Ashcroft in reality use his chairmanship of the Subcommittee on the
Constitution to bottle it up in committee for several months; the bill
never made it to the Senate floor despite bipartisan support.

In response to charges that the powder/crack cocaine sentencing disparity
is racially discriminatory, Sen. Ashcroft rejected legislation recommended
by the US Sentencing Commission and sponsored by African American
legislators that would have reduced crack cocaine sentences to the level of
powder cocaine sentences.  Instead, Sen. Ashcroft supported a bill to raise
the powder cocaine sentences -- despite a consensus among criminal justice
experts that the disparities are driven by enforcement policy and
prosecutorial bias in conjunction with the laws, and that powder cocaine
enforcement is also carried out in a racially discriminatory way.

Sen. Ashcroft objected vociferously to spending money on drug treatment
rather than drug interdiction, claiming that treatment "enables" drug users
and that enforcement is a more effective use of funds.  But after decades
characterized by intensive interdiction efforts during which time the
availability of drugs has increased and the price plummeted, and despite
study after study showing that treatment is dramatically more effective
than enforcement, to claim that interdiction is more effective than
treatment demonstrates an astonishing inability or unwillingness to
evaluate drug policy in an objective manner.  Indeed, there isn't clear
evidence that drug interdiction is more effective than doing nothing; to
claim interdiction is more effective than treatment is simply off the
reality meter.

As Attorney General, John Ashcroft would have enormous power and influence
over policies such as these.  Particularly troubling is his lack of
seriousness about racial disparity in the criminal justice system, at a
time when the problem of racial profiling is just beginning to get
attention.  The 

Re: Re: RE: Re: Energy deregulation GATS

2001-01-23 Thread Eugene Coyle

Just quickly:  Jim, are you proposing to funnel public money to the utilities
by them charging customers higher prices and then the customers get re-imbursed
out of the state treasury?  Utilities get more money, customers come out even,
but taxpayers pay?

Not very appealing to me.  For twenty-five years we've had national and
states giving money to low income people to offset the utility bills.  I've
never like that, either.  Just keeps the political temperature down while
paying utilities top dollar, doesn't it?

Gene

Jim Devine wrote:

 then, make it a refundable tax credit, or lower the state sales tax further.

 At 11:55 AM 1/23/01 -0500, you wrote:
 problem is a lot of folks pay little or no income
 tax but still pay utility bills.
 
 mbs
 
 
 It seems to me that Governor Gray Davis has a easy solution to the current
 energy crunch, which seems to have shut pen-l down for awhile: he could
 allow electricity retail prices to rise, while allowing California
 consumers to write off electricity costs on their state income taxes this
 year. (The latter is possible because the state government is running a
 budget surplus.)  This is not the best solution, but it would work, perhaps
 to give breathing room to allow a better solution. Gene, what do you think?
 
 At 05:49 PM 1/22/01 -0800, you wrote:
 
  The Globe and Mail  January
  22, 2001
  
  U.S. touts California-style power plan
  
   By Barrie McKenna
  
  SAN FRANCISCO -- The U.S. government is pushing California-
  style power deregulation on the rest of the world even as the state's
  controversial electricity free market experiment continues to unravel
  at home.
   Just weeks before Californians were hit with the first power
  blackouts since the Second World War, the United States was
  quietly lobbying in Geneva to convince Canada and other U.S.
  trading partners that electricity deregulation should be an integral
  part of a proposed free trade in services deal.
 
 Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine

 Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine




Fwd: prison question

2001-01-23 Thread Jim Devine

from SLATE:
USA [Today] ... tops its front with the capture yesterday at a Colorado RV 
park of four of those Texas prison escapees. Rather than also surrender, a 
fifth shot himself, and the remaining two convicts are still at large. The 
cops got their key tip from a viewer of
America's Most Wanted. The WP and NYT also front the story.

does anyone know, did those guys escape from a government-run or a 
privately-run prison?

In the past, some people have escaped from privately-run prisons, with the 
government paying to cost of recapture, etc.

Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~JDevine




Re: RE: Free Mike!

2001-01-23 Thread Jim Devine

At 03:41 PM 01/23/2001 -0800, you wrote:
.  The
fact that Marc Rich was pardoned and Milken was not is conclusive proof that
Clinton is really as corrupt as he appears.

hey, man! you're dissing the man who ended welfare as we know it and showed 
the Sudan who was boss!
;-)

Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~JDevine




Re: what is productivity

2001-01-23 Thread Yoshie Furuhashi

Michael Perelman posted:

Sven Larsen posted this to another
list.  The interesting part, for me, is
the subjective nature of what is, or is
not productive -- sort of like the
discussion we had long ago about
measuring GDP.  Economics attempts to
project itself as some sort of objective
science, but 

A Danish woman is before a tax appeals board today to defend her 
right to make a tax deduction for expenses she had while 
undertaking a silicon implant operation. The woman, a strip danser, 
can show records she has doubled her income after the operation. 
She also says she had the implants inserted only to "stay in 
business" and "keep up with larger competition [sic]".

It seems that the definition of productivity becomes more subjective 
when the production of surplus value concerns activities other than 
single-minded dedication to the production of more widgets in a 
shorter period of time.

Investments in production equipment or equipment necessary for 
one's ability to stay active on the labor market is eligible for 
tax exemption, but the local tax office denied her implants tax 
exempt status with the motivation that it cannot be ruled out she 
will be able to avail herself to her own pleasure of those implants 
when she's off work, which would then be a disqualifying 
circumstance. Today, while presenting her case to the appeals 
board, the woman promised she would give the board a chance to 
inspect the results of her income-enhancing investment, so they can 
make their own, unbiased judgment.

It seems, however, at least certain that the Danish tax officials in 
question are misinformed of one objective fact: "All types of breast 
surgery, whether reconstruction or commercial augmentation result in 
some loss of
sensitivity" (at http://www.pinkribbon.com/recon.htm).  This being 
the case, the tax officials are wrong to deny the strip dancer her 
tax exemption, since silicon implants cannot enhance  actually 
diminish her sensual pleasures.  The woman underwent the surgery for 
the purpose of making her labor more productive, at considerable 
health risks to herself.

Yoshie




Re: Free Mike!

2001-01-23 Thread Michael Perelman

Nobody commented that he also freed Susan Rosenberg and Linda Evans -- the
latter, you may recall, asked for help from pen-l.

Yes, Rich is slime.  He also engaged in union busting, if I recall
correctly.

Stewart is a better place to look for what Milken did.
Stewart, James B. 1991. Den of Thieves (NY: Simon and Schuster).
183: "Because of extraordinary control over the junk bond market, Milken
could buy back securities at artificially low prices from Drexel clients
who had no way of knowing their actual value; sell them to Boesky at a
small profit; have Boesky resell the securities to Drexel at a much higher
price; and in turn resell them to Drexel clients at still higher prices."

On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 08:14:02PM -0800, Jim Devine wrote:
 At 03:41 PM 01/23/2001 -0800, you wrote:
 .  The
 fact that Marc Rich was pardoned and Milken was not is conclusive proof that
 Clinton is really as corrupt as he appears.
 
 hey, man! you're dissing the man who ended welfare as we know it and showed 
 the Sudan who was boss!
 ;-)
 
 Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~JDevine
 

-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Why we call for Civilization, not globalization

2001-01-23 Thread Lisa Ian Murray

[Yet more on the phlogiston that is "the free market"]


http://www.iht.com/articles/8510.html
As Asian Reforms Go Into Eclipse, Growth Outlook Darkens
Michael Richardson International Herald Tribune  Wednesday, January 24, 2001

 SINGAPORE: The signs are surfacing across Asia.
.
In South Korea, officials decide to bail out heavily indebted conglomerates. In
Indonesia, the central bank announces that it will enforce aggressively what it
says are existing curbs on the supply of rupiahs available to offshore
institutions. In Malaysia, Prime Minister Mahathir bin Mohamad renews his call
for Asia to reject "unfettered predatory capitalism and the absolutely free
market" that he says are being imposed on the region by Western powers.
.
East Asian governments apparently are retreating from free-market principles and
abandoning key reform efforts just as their export-oriented economies are
slowing because of shrinking sales to the United States. The backsliding is
expected to intensify as the U.S. economic downturn and the threat of continued
high oil prices bring tougher times to many East Asian countries in coming
months, making it more difficult for political leaders to make economically
painful and unpopular decisions.
.
But the cost, economists and bankers warn, will be bigger debts and slower
growth that will further undermine business and investment confidence, already
sagging as a result of political instability in the region.
.
For the first time since the financial crisis of 1997 and 1998, East Asia faces
a difficult external outlook. The United States, which absorbs more than 20
percent of the region's exports, is slowing more quickly than had been forecast
just a few weeks ago, and orders for electronics, East Asia's leading export,
are falling.
.
The regional monitoring unit of the Asian Development Bank warned recently that
the slowing of the drive for reform in some countries, particularly Indonesia,
the Philippines and Thailand, was a cause for serious concern.
.
"Implementation of reforms may be more difficult in a context of slower growth,"
the bank said, "but the costs of inaction are likely to increase in a less
hospitable global environment."
.
It added that South Korea and Malaysia as well as Indonesia, the Philippines and
Thailand were facing "the double whammy of increased external and domestic
risks."
.
Other analysts said that China, widely considered to have played an important
role in helping East Asia recover from the last crisis by sticking to its
market-reform efforts and not devaluing its currency, was likely to be less
resolute this year as slowing exports to the United States put a brake on
growth.
.
David Roche, managing director of Independent Strategy, an investment advisory
company in London, said many Asian countries had failed to reform the financial
systems that were the root cause of the currency turmoil that started in
Thailand in mid-1997. "Banks were bailed out, not reformed," he said.
.
Among the signs of backsliding that worry foreign bankers and investors are:
.
•South Korea's bailout of its chaebol, or big conglomerates.
.
•The newly elected Thai government's aversion to selling banks to foreign
interests and its pledge to use $12 billion to buy bad debt from Thai banks.
.
•The unraveling of Malaysia's privatization program.
.
•The slowing of state enterprise and bank reform in China.
.
•Indonesia's curb on the free movement of capital.
.
The International Monetary Fund, which marshaled billions of dollars in
emergency loans to help Thailand, Indonesia and South Korea recover from the
1997 crisis, has called on the region to intensify, not slacken, reform efforts.
The Fund's managing director, Horst Koehler, said the IMF expected economic
growth in Asia, excluding Japan, to slow to around 5 percent in 2001, from about
8 percent last year, as exports faltered.
.
"I would consider such a slowdown more as a normalization than a cause for doom
and gloom, and justifying neither panic nor frantic actions," he said, noting
that East Asian countries had cut their short-term debts, rebuilt their
foreign-exchange reserves and were operating more flexible exchange-rate
policies.
.
"The slowdown that causes me greater concern is that of progress in structural
reforms in many Asian countries," Mr. Koehler said.
.
In South Korea, officials said action to rescue chaebol was just a temporary
measure. The state-owned Korea Development Bank is to pay about 25 trillion won
($19.62 billion) of 65 trillion won in corporate debt that is maturing this
year.
.
In Indonesia, the central bank's actions would make it more difficult for
speculators to attack the rupiah, which fell about 25 percent against the dollar
in the past year as the country's problems grew.
.
In the Philippines, the weeks of political turmoil that forced President Joseph
Estrada to resign over the weekend sent stocks and the peso into a tailspin,
diverting policymakers from the urgent task of improving tax collection 

Putin's KGB instincts on Chechnya

2001-01-23 Thread Chris Burford

The following Guardian article probably comes as much from economic 
considerations as political. In order to maintain the central integrity of 
Russia and to dominate the strategic oil area of the Caucasus, Putin played 
the Chechen card and won the presidential succession to Yeltsin.

The coordinated bombing of blocks of Russian flats was very helpful for 
this project

His exit strategy however needs more calculation. Having large numbers of 
troops in Chechnya is a cost liability because they are targets. Reframe 
the problem as purely one of terrorism and it is obvious that the successor 
to the KGB, the FSB, is the agency to control the situation. It is of 
course Putin's firm.

They will mimimise the target they present to the enemy; they will know 
best how to destabilise the leadership of the resistance, and how to work 
with "constitutional" forces to set up a peaceful government within the 
Russian Federation. They will cause fewer random atrocities to the civilian 
population, torture fewer people but more efficiently, and with less 
damaging reports leaking out to interfering western human rights monitoring 
agencies.

Perhaps he will pull it off and the governance of Chechnya will merge 
imperceptibly with the total social management that is the frame of 
thinking of most governments today.

It will be interesting to see the cautious congratulatory comments from 
western agencies.

 


Putin puts KGB's successors in charge of war to crush guerrillas Special 
report: crisis in Chechnya

Ian Traynor in Moscow Tuesday January 23, 2001

Sixteen months into Russia's savage war of attrition in Chechnya and with 
no end in sight, President Vladimir Putin yesterday stripped his army 
generals of their command of the campaign and put the domestic security 
service, the main successor to the KGB, in charge of the Chechnya war.

In what appeared to be a vote of no confidence in the generals' ability to 
tame the Chechen rebels, despite repeated bragging that they have been 
crushed, Mr Putin put a close ally, Nikolai Patrushev, head of the FSB 
(domestic security service), in command and ordered him to report on his 
progress by mid-May.

Moscow says it has 80,000 troops in Chechnya struggling to contain what it 
puts at 1,000 guerrillas. But by the official tally, widely seen as too 
low, the Russians are being killed at the rate of more than 160 a month, 
with almost 500 being wounded as the rebels use ruthless hit-and-run tactics.

Its principal garrison Gudermes, long under ostensible Russian control and 
the headquarters for the civil administration of Chechnya, is the latest 
battleground, according to Russian media yesterday.

Guerrillas attacked the main hospital on Sunday, keeping Russian troops 
under fire for eight hours before melting away into the darkness. According 
to the Chechens, they left 20 Russian soldiers dead. Moscow admitted losing 
four soldiers and confirmed that many were injured in a cafe bomb blast in 
Gudermes.

The guerrillas are also targeting "collaborationist" members of the 
pro-Moscow Chechen administration and its local supporters every week.

The lightning speed of the attack highlights the vulnerability of the 
Russian conscripts, who hole up each evening in converted schools and 
public buildings, surrounded by mines and barbed wire. They live in fear of 
the rebels who attack checkpoints, mine roads and ambush Russian convoys.

Sergei Ponomarenko, a Russian who recently resigned as a local government 
chief in Chechnya, told the newspaper Izvestiya that the guerrillas - who 
routinely ignore curfews and distribute propaganda leaflets "to show who's 
really boss" - have seized the initiative.

When Chechen snipers hit a Russian, Moscow's forces commonly respond with 
indiscriminate artillery barrages which maim and kill civilians or launch 
"cleansing" raids on villages and towns, dragging away males of fighting age.

"This has turned into a war against an entire civilian population. That's a 
fact, that's the reality," Ruslan Khasbulatov, a former Russian 
parliamentary leader and himself a Chechen, told the Russian government 
recently.

Russian or loyalist Chechen administrators and military officers, 
meanwhile, are using their positions to line their pockets, Mr Ponomarenko 
said, an assertion echoed by Mr Khasbulatov who said the generals wanted 
the war to go on because of the opportunities for plundering and profiteering.

Mr Putin's move yesterday may be an attempt to break this cycle of 
viciousness and seal a victory in Chechnya. But it also seems a counsel of 
despair. The president recently described Chechnya as the source of 
"Russia's national shame". It also propelled him to power in 1999.

Yesterday's move was a snub to the army generals who, according to Mr 
Khasbulatov, are deliberately prolonging the war to enhance their clout in 
Russian politics and to exact retribution for their defeat in the last 
Chechen war of 1994-96.

In a decree that 

Re: Re: Energy deregulation GATS

2001-01-23 Thread Margaret Coleman

The tax write off answer is better than no solution at all, but there are two
problems:
1.  It doesn't address the basic issues -- deregulation has caused shortages
and rampant energy price inflation.
2.  It assumes that consumer will have enough money to pay quickly escalating
costs and then wait a year to ge their money back. For the poor, especially the
elderly on fixed incomes, this may not be true.  maggie coleman

Jim Devine wrote:

 It seems to me that Governor Gray Davis has a easy solution to the current
 energy crunch, which seems to have shut pen-l down for awhile: he could
 allow electricity retail prices to rise, while allowing California
 consumers to write off electricity costs on their state income taxes this
 year. (The latter is possible because the state government is running a
 budget surplus.)  This is not the best solution, but it would work, perhaps
 to give breathing room to allow a better solution. Gene, what do you think?

 At 05:49 PM 1/22/01 -0800, you wrote:

 The Globe and Mail  January
 22, 2001
 
 U.S. touts California-style power plan
 
  By Barrie McKenna
 
 SAN FRANCISCO -- The U.S. government is pushing California-
 style power deregulation on the rest of the world even as the state's
 controversial electricity free market experiment continues to unravel
 at home.
  Just weeks before Californians were hit with the first power
 blackouts since the Second World War, the United States was
 quietly lobbying in Geneva to convince Canada and other U.S.
 trading partners that electricity deregulation should be an integral
 part of a proposed free trade in services deal.

 Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine