http://media.guardian.co.uk/broadcast/story/0,7493,653313,00.html
Google reveals this usage a year ago, clearly by Campbell.
The idea seems to be that there is a choice of many processes and one can
switch from one to another as a matter of taste or lofty overview.
Chris Burford
London
And this as recently as Dec 9, on the official Downing Street website, no less.
Asked if he would accept that the Prime Minister appeared to have breached
his own Code of Conduct when buying the two flats in Bristol, the Prime
Minister's Official Spokesman (PMOS) said that we had dealt with
Here we see the issue of bodies of armed men, coming together with the
issue of confused notions of justice, coming together with an ideological apparatus that informs and affects the process by which decisions are made. That is catalyzed by the technological brilliance of the internet, which
In a message dated 2/7/03 8:51:08 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BISMARCK, ND-The stage was set for another international
showdown Monday, when chief U.N. weapons inspector Hans
Blix confirmed that the remote, isolationist state of
North Dakota is in possession of a large
The other day you wondered if I could theorize the difference between
antagonistic and non-antagonistic contradictions. At least off hand I
can't. (Incidentally, the idea is not only from Mao. In Capital Marx
will speak of "antagonisms," meaning I think "antagonistic
contradiction" in Mao's
On Friday, February 7, 2003 at 17:15:10 (-0800) Michael Perelman writes:
It is [...] good [...] to clip [...] extraneous text ...
Amen.
Bill
There's a NYT article on it today at
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/08/international/europe/08BRIT.html
and mentioned in another article.
Paul
***
Confronting 9-11, Ideologies of Race, and Eminent Economists, Vol. 20
RESEARCH
I guess I must be in the loyal opposition too. I want to understand
Bin Laden the better to destroy him. I don't believe anyone here
regards him as a freedom fighter. In fact, I don't think bin Laden
and his gang regard themselves as freedom fighters
Don't get me wrong. In my opinion Bin
Title: RE: [PEN-L:34468] Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: doublethink
Ian: Nagarjuna was arguably the first philosopher to systematically explore and *break* with the limits of the applicability of the law of non-contradiction and the implications for ontology and epistemology.
me: so he ... embraces
--- Doyle Saylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings Economists,
JKS writes in a thread that is drawing all and
asunder their opinion,
JKS
I guess I must be in the loyal opposition too.
Doyle,
Not me. I don't want to continue capitalism, so I'm
not loyal to their
wind.
Don't be
Title: incentive effects
from SLATE: Another shuttle safety piece in the [Washington] Post evolves around NASA's privatization of much of the program in the mid-1990s. The piece is pretty shallow, but it does have one important bit: NASA docks Contractors' pay when they run into
andie nachgeborenen wrote:
Look at how the Factor talks to him, using his title, saying,
You're smarter than I am., etc.
In O'Reilly-land that can be an insult. Being dumb, like W, is a sign
of populism. (Of course, O'Reilly did get a masters at the Kennedy
School, so he's not innocent of
http://w3.access.gpo.gov/eop/
Economic Report of the President
Greetings Economists,
JKS responds about my ironing habits,
JKS,
Don't be irony-impaired, Doyle.
Doyle,
;-)
JKS
Fish would eat you and your milieu for an appetizer.
Your bet's idle, though, because he wouldn't consider
you worth him time. Anyone who is familiar with his
writing and speaking
I am suggesting that (according to the transcript) O'Reilly may have been
tolerant, in part, because what Fish had to say was not all that
provocative. If Fish had said, say, Bush in his environmental policy shows
the same disrespect for human life as Bin Laden, would he have received the
same
Thank you very much, Jim, for pointing out the article. Setting up an
appropriate incentive system seems to have eluded most privatization
schemes of which I am aware.
Every economist knows about principal agent problems, but I really hear
them discussed in terms of privatization.
--
Michael
At 01:22 PM 2/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:
andie nachgeborenen wrote:
Look at how the Factor talks to him, using his title, saying,
You're smarter than I am., etc.
In O'Reilly-land that can be an insult. Being dumb, like W, is a sign
of populism. (Of course, O'Reilly did get a masters at the
Steven McGraw wrote:
Plenty
of public intellectuals have an equally uncomplicated view of the world
Like who? Fred Barnes? Howard Zinn?
Doug
Are we really talking about views of the world or about communication
styles of propagandists?
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 05:13:50PM -0500, Doug Henwood wrote:
Steven McGraw wrote:
Plenty
of public intellectuals have an equally uncomplicated view of the world
Like who? Fred Barnes? Howard
Steven McGraw wrote:
Plenty
of public intellectuals have an equally uncomplicated view of the world,
I suspect _everyone_ has at least two views of the world, a complex view
and a simpler view -- simplification coming from different sources in
different people. (Everyone has a third
The new SEC chief vowed he would get tough. True to his word, is telling
the states to stop getting involved in punishing corporate evildoers.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/1/03, Yoshie Furuhashi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Eric Schlosser in his FAST FOOD NATION
. . . quotes someone saying that irradiation
simply allows the meat-packers to avoid dealing
with the root causes of E. Coli and the like, i.e.,
the crowded and totally unsanitary conditions
of
At 05:13 PM 2/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Steven McGraw wrote:
Plenty
of public intellectuals have an equally uncomplicated view of the world
Like who? Fred Barnes? Howard Zinn?
Doug
In this case I'm thinking mostly of mainstream-to-liberal commentators.
Don't wanna name too many names in case
At 08/02/03 06:09 -0500, Melvin wrote:
Goggle's is correct: the study of
the anus primarily deals with its function as an apparatus for discarding
feces - shit. Let's not get caught up in a bunch of shit.
On reflection I suspect that the subliminal association of
'processology' with proctology
Irradiation kills most of the harmful organisms, but it also changes many
of the characteristics of the food itself. Nobody has studied how these
altered forms affect health.
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 07:08:16PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does irradiation kill or at least render harmless
Observer UK Sunday Feb 9
http://www.observer.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12239,892112,00.html
http://www.observer.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12239,892145,00.html
Details on the Coalition Information Centre and
It is not that the intelligence services are necessary anti-war.
Intelligence sources told The Observer this weekend that the case for war
was a good one, but complex. 'People want to
This comes from Marxmail.
Ayse Gul Altinay, who wrote the following, is an cultural
antropologist at Sabanci University. Below is a letter to NY
Times criticizing their coverage of antiwar activity in Turkey. I
had sent another artcile of hers from istanbul.indymedia a while
ago. Quite a smart
soula avramidis:
Is there any state out there that is more unstable
than the US at this point in history?
Answer: at least the group of 77 AND China.
In what sense? In the sense of Lyaponov?
Best,
Sabri
Forwarded from the Istanbul Social Forum list. The action
described in the call below may sound unusual to you but there is
a long history behind it. But, unfortunately, I am short of time
to explain.
Best,
Sabri
++
THIS IS A WORLD
Title: Irradiated Beef in School Lunches
one problem is that some E. Coli would survive, so that a
radiation-resistant would eventually develop. Also, wouldn't it make
sense to simply clean up the feedlots, so that no sh*t got in our food?
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
It would be better to clean that crap up, but the resistant strain problem
would require that it get transferred back into the food chain to breed
some more. I assume that feeding the animals antibiotics makes the
problem far worse.
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 06:30:25PM -0800, Devine, James wrote:
First casualties in the propaganda firefight
All's fair in the war for hearts and minds: frustrated by the failure of the
UN weapons inspectors in Iraq to find the 'smoking gun', Downing Street
resorted to plagiarising a 12-year-old US doctoral thesis
Gaby Hinsliff, Martin Bright, Peter Beaumont
I am teaching a course on Marx's _Capital_, Vols. II and III at
the Brecht Forum in New York City. Although most of the sessions
are strictly on the texts, a couple will be devoted to Critiques
and Defenses of Marx. To make things fair, balanced, evenhanded,
I am interested in conducting such
I just got this from Bob McChesney. Could this be the opening shot in
D.K.'s presidential campaign. To Doug H., maybe he should be your next
guest.
I have just been notified that Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich (Dem., Ohio) will
appear on the George
Stephanopolus Sunday morning TV show opposite Colin
Andrew :
(1) Marx's account of the transformation of
values into production prices has been proven
to be internally inconsistent or in error.
SNIP
I am looking for someone willing to argue *in favor*
of one or both of these propositions. I will be arguing
against them.
How about this?
We need to start thinking about what we mean by "science" beforeit is too late! If you want to know what I mean, just go to auniversity library near you. You will see that the number ofbooks and journals, "scientific" or otherwise, are growingexponentially, like a cancer. anyone know or remember
washingtonpost.com
How Will We Manage the Oil?
By Michael J. Economides
Sunday, February 9, 2003; Page B07
Whoever conquers a free town and does not demolish it commits a great error
and may expect to be ruined himself.
-- Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince, 1513
With war against Iraq now almost
38 matches
Mail list logo
