Brad DeLong wrote:
I'm not Senator Albert Beveridge. I don't agree with Senator Albert
Beveridge.
Why are you claiming that I do?
I'm not saying that at all. I think your arguments would hold more water if
some of your righteous indignation were directed at U.S. government
officials who are
Brad DeLong wrote:
On the one hand, trees and hills. On the other hand, people. On what
theory of political justice can the first ever trump the second?
Well, Senator Albert Beveridge seemed to have a fairly firm grasp of one
such. I guess it depends on which people you are addressing.
What does geography suggest that Alsace-Lorraine is part of, France or Germany? Or
more to the point today, East Jerusalem? --jks
In a message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2000 1:43:36 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Brad DeLong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For what they are worth, my views on the Malvinas are
En relación a [PEN-L:1484] Re: Imperialist progressivism (was R,
el 8 Sep 00, a las 9:16, Michael Perelman dijo:
The debate on the Falklands/Malvinas is troubling. I thought the
outcome meant that Thatcher triumphed politically, while the junta
had to face political defeat, eventually.
Not only Brad DeLong but also Mike Kearney. OK, politics is a long
exercise in patience... As Toussaint Louverture said: "La France
entiére vient contre nous!"
Will answer to just two basic assertions here, which are the only
ones that matter. As to condemnation of "militarism", won't return
Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky wrote:
I reserve to my own people the right to resort to
military means (or any other) to put an end to this abject era of
imperialist exaction and social crime that Argentina is passing
through since 1975 at least..
Fair enough. I am surprised, however, by your
En relación a [PEN-L:1459] Re: Imperialist progressivism (was R,
el 8 Sep 00, a las 4:46, Brad De Long dijo:
So Galtieri's strategy would have worked: the domestic opposition on
the left would have forgotten his crimes and thrown their support
behind his regime--if only he had won his
Dear Michael Kearney,
I apologize for my harshness on you. It is evident that you are
interested in discussion, not in deploying your wisdom on me as Brad
does. So that excuse me if, for the time being, I cannot answer to
your posting (by the way, I am afraid that we are getting too far
away
