Barkley wrote:
... nobody should be under any illusions whatsoever. The Bush
administration is turning out to be far far worse than anybody forecast
and certainly far worse than a Gore administration would have been. And it
will negatively impact many people in the rest
of the world, I am
-
From: "Jim Devine" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 12:13 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:9528] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.
Barkley wrote:
... nobody should be under any illusions whatsoever. The Bush
administration is turning out to be far fa
At 12:45 PM 3/26/01 -0500, you wrote:
They could overdo it. But, most people do not
even know what they are doing. It is a successful
stealth campaign so far.
yeah, but I'm trying to intuit future trends.
As for North Korea, they are probably right that
the DPRK will not outright
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.
At 12:45 PM 3/26/01 -0500, you wrote:
They could overdo it. But, most people do not
even know what they are doing. It is a successful
stealth campaign so far.
yeah, but I'm trying to intuit future trends.
As for North Korea, they are prob
What evidence is there that Nader voters were in fact potential Gore voters?
That is, is there any data to show that had Nader not been an option, the
people who voted for him would have voted for Gore? Surely that is the
correct question to ask. Nader voters may simply have stayed at home
Hey, Mark, don't bother. The Demicans can't face up to the fact that they
lost because they ran like Repugs, as well as running a generally sorry,
suckass candidate who blew what should have been a sure thing, and they are
deeply resentful because they think they own the votes of the left.
But the idea that the left cannot be taken for granted is profoundly
frightening to Dems.
And profoundly heart-gladdening for Republicans.
The idea that we might be able to exercise real power is absolutely
terrifying. If we are to put together a winning party, it means
taking votes from
Mark Laffey wrote:
What evidence is there that Nader voters were in fact potential Gore voters?
That is, is there any data to show that had Nader not been an option, the
people who voted for him would have voted for Gore? Surely that is the
correct question to ask. Nader voters may simply have
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Doug Henwood wrote:
Mark Laffey wrote:
What evidence is there that Nader voters were in fact potential Gore voters?
That is, is there any data to show that had Nader not been an option, the
people who voted for him would have voted for Gore? Surely that is the
Yea Doug, a typical American reply. It ain't us, it is all you
foreigners.
I am no apologist for Canadian domestic and foreign policy, indeed
I have a reputation for the opposite as you might surmise, but I
would remind Doug that all these legislative measures were taken
as a result of
Doug,
This is repugnant. You have never heard me defending Canadian
policy on this list. Furthermore, if you knew what I have been
doing, I have been crossing the country speaking and denouncing
Canadian policy in this area.
Paul Phillips
Date sent: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 13:47:23
Doug writes,
A couple of more questions occurred to me while I was in the shower.
Do the 32 million members of the U.S. working class who live in
officially defined poverty deserve their fate? Or worse? How about
the 20-30 million more who live close to poverty? How about the - I'm
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yea Doug, a typical American reply. It ain't us, it is all you
foreigners.
Hold it, now where did Doug say that? Not even close.
Yes, but in your reply to Doug's transparently sarcastic remark on
Candaian innocence, you seem to be taking Doug as an ardent defender of US
foreign policy...
Doug's displeasure, if I'm reading it correctly, is with the idea that
wishing any working class any kind of economic decline is not a
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001 13:44:52 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So Canadians are responsible for this? Get a life Doug. What the
collapse of the American economy will do is discredit American
imperialism through the rest of the world thereby improving the long
run prospects of the rest of the
-L:9465] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.
Yes, but in your reply to Doug's transparently sarcastic remark on
Candaian innocence, you seem to be taking Doug as an ardent defender of US
foreign policy...
Doug's displeasure, if I'm reading it correctly, is with the idea that
wishing any
Brad DeLong wrote:
Yet another blessing we have received from Ralph Nader...
No, from Al Gore. If as many self-identified Democrats had voted for
Gore as self-identified Republicans voted for Bush, W would still be
governor of Texas.
Doug
And Nader was in their pitching, telling
And Nader was in their pitching, telling self-identified Democrats
not to vote for Gore...
Brad DeLong
As was 'Dubya; welcome to the world of free speech.
Ian
Except that Dubya is opposed to ergonomic rules. Nader is supposed to
like them--but he likes being a publicity
Except that Dubya is opposed to ergonomic rules. Nader is supposed to
like them--but he likes being a publicity hound more...
Brad DeLong
*
Apologies, Michael.
Brad, grow up. Your Ivy League edumakation is showing.
Ian
And Nader was in their pitching, telling self-identified Democrats
not to vote for Gore...
Brad DeLong
As was 'Dubya; welcome to the world of free speech.
Ian
Brad DeLong wrote:
Yet another blessing we have received from Ralph Nader...
No, from Al Gore. If as many self-identified Democrats had voted for
Gore as self-identified Republicans voted for Bush, W would still be
governor of Texas.
Doug
And Nader was in their pitching, telling
Shane Mage wrote:
Is it Nader's fault that the Gore-Clinton administration delayed,
obviously with intention, the promulgation of regulations vitally
important to working people, until their concessionary though fraudulent
successor could undo them with a stroke of the pen?
no. Further, it's
22 matches
Mail list logo
