2010/1/3 Eric Wilhelm enoba...@gmail.com
add one more level and make
the tab be History, then history.html is a page which says a
href=phalanxPhalanx 100/a started in 2003...
Perhaps somebody would like to put together a more comprehensive
QA timeline including the development of
Hi,
2010/1/3 Eric Wilhelm enoba...@gmail.com
Am I alone here in thinking that we should be using the Onion trademark
rather than O'Reilly's trademark camel on the perl.org sites?
This is what I told the TPF marketing list when they asked...
---
The goal for www.perl.org is to encourage new
On Sunday 03 January 2010 at 03:21, Leo Lapworth wrote:
Maybe someone could get a grant to hire someone/a company with design skills
to come up with a better logo than the onion?
It seems rather unlikely that TPF will go through the business of applying for
another trademark because you don't
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 11:40 AM, chromatic chroma...@wgz.org wrote:
If the design of perl.org had been up to me, I'd have spent much more time
promoting the Perl brand instead of the proprietary brand of a privately held
corporation.
For better or for worse, the Perl brand *is* the camel.
Leo Lapworth wrote:
Maybe someone could get a grant to hire someone/a company with design skills
to come up with a better logo than the onion?
I always thought that something to do with pearls would be nice. Kinda
like this
* Pedro Figueiredo m...@pedrofigueiredo.org [2010-01-03T07:06:19]
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 11:40 AM, chromatic chroma...@wgz.org wrote:
If the design of perl.org had been up to me, I'd have spent much more time
promoting the Perl brand instead of the proprietary brand of a privately
held
* Shawn H Corey shawnhco...@gmail.com [2010-01-03T07:22:01]
Leo Lapworth wrote:
Maybe someone could get a grant to hire someone/a company with design skills
to come up with a better logo than the onion?
I always thought that something to do with pearls would be nice.
The problems with
Ricardo Signes wrote:
The problems with pearls include: (a) promoting mispeling Perl as Pearl and
(b)
a pearl reduces, in its simplest depiction, to a circle. It's not very
visually distinctive.
They're pronounced the same way. Perl as a pearl is a pun, a play on
words. (Of course, some
--- On Sun, 3/1/10, chromatic chroma...@wgz.org wrote:
From: chromatic chroma...@wgz.org
Maybe someone could get a grant to hire someone/a
company with design skills
to come up with a better logo than the onion?
It seems rather unlikely that TPF will go through the
business of
--- On Sun, 3/1/10, Shawn H Corey shawnhco...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Shawn H Corey shawnhco...@gmail.com
An onion can be pretty pared down before you lose
sight of what it is.
I pared many an onion and you loose sight of it when the
tears start to
flow. :)
And let's face it: to many
Ovid wrote:
What is our concern vis-a-vis the camel and how can we approach O'Reilly
regarding this concern?
http://oreilly.com/pub/a/oreilly/perl/usage/
Note the part about permissi...@oreilly.com
--
Just my 0.0002 million dollars worth,
Shawn
Programming is as much about
Ovid wrote:
And let's face it: to many people, onions stink and they *do* make you cry.
That's not a positive association.
Perl: the language that will make you cry.
Shrek: strikeOgres are/strikePerls is like onions.
Donkey: They stink?
Shrek: Yes. No.
Donkey: Oh, they make you cry.
Ovid writes:
customer perception is important. ... From a marketing perspective,
the camel wins hand-down. From a legal perspective, what are the pros
and cons?
This definitely is important -- but as something which affects the Perl
community as a whole, this aspect of the discussion seems
On Sunday 03 January 2010 at 09:23, Ovid wrote:
I would be happy to continue this discussion an another list; which one is
most appropriate?
What is our concern vis-a-vis the camel
Any use of the camel in a fashion which may cause confusion with products,
services, or initiatives of the
14 matches
Mail list logo
