> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:42:52 +0200, "Gabor Szabo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> Sure, I did not mean that you implement it just because I had this
> idea about 10 years later than Bundles were implemented.
> I just meant to address one of the concerned raised in the discussion.
O
On 10/31/06, David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps you should consider writing a CPAN::Mini extension that makes
it easy to create and maintain a minicpan repository with the features
that you want. Rather than mirroring just CPAN, I would imagine it
would probably draw from Backpan a
David Golden wrote:
On 10/31/06, Gabor Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In a way this is what Linux distros do or ActiveState does, but I
would like to do it
on CPAN level and still in source code.
As a start I could possibly creat a minicpan for particular modules
and their cross-tested
version
For those that missed it's release let me also mention that "pip" is out
now.
http://search.cpan.org/~adamk/Module-Plan-Base-0.04/lib/pip.pm
This extends the Bundle idea to third party or arbitrary (such as
backpan or whatever) modules.
I wrote it because I wanted to install a specific set o
On 10/31/06, Gabor Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In a way this is what Linux distros do or ActiveState does, but I
would like to do it
on CPAN level and still in source code.
As a start I could possibly creat a minicpan for particular modules
and their cross-tested
versions.
Does this make se
On 10/31/06, Gabor Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/31/06, Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 30 October 2006 18:16, David Golden wrote:
> > Bundle gives the option of either freezing a particular version (by
> > specifying a distribution file) or else fully upgrading t
On 10/31/06, Andreas J. Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:51:42 +0200, "Gabor Szabo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> What about adding a mechanism to PAUSE to map module/version pairs
> to the bundles they are mentioned in? One could parse the most recent
> bundle
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:51:42 +0200, "Gabor Szabo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> What about adding a mechanism to PAUSE to map module/version pairs
> to the bundles they are mentioned in? One could parse the most recent
> bundles, extract the list of modules and the frozen version
On 10/31/06, Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 30 October 2006 18:16, David Golden wrote:
> Bundle gives the option of either freezing a particular version (by
> specifying a distribution file) or else fully upgrading to the
> absolute latest version (by specifying a module).
On Monday 30 October 2006 18:16, David Golden wrote:
> Bundle gives the option of either freezing a particular version (by
> specifying a distribution file) or else fully upgrading to the
> absolute latest version (by specifying a module).
The problem I've experienced with this method is that auth
On 10/30/06, Andreas J. Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:23:09 +0200, "Gabor Szabo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> The mapping of flag to Module-Version pairs could actually reside on any
> server with ftp or http access. CPAN.pm would be configured to use such
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:23:09 +0200, "Gabor Szabo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> The mapping of flag to Module-Version pairs could actually reside on any
> server with ftp or http access. CPAN.pm would be configured to use such
> a URL.
> What do you think?
What you describe ca
I am not exactly sure this is the appropriate place to raise this idea
but it relates very strongly to quality of CPAN modules.
Occasionally new version of CPAN modules break code in applications.
We cannot catch that, but we can at least catch cases when it breaks
other CPAN modules.
There are
13 matches
Mail list logo
