On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 3:18 AM, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Acme-CPANAuthors-Israeli version 0.01 was heavily broken, and I:
>
> 1. Already released version 0.0102
>
> 2. Deleted the previous versions from the CPANPerl QA using
> PAUSE.
>
> I don't understand why I'm still getting re
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 10:18:00AM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> I don't understand why I'm still getting reports for it, when there are
> already more updated packages.
Because the system in place was essentially a quick fix in response
to the weight of criticism for receiving the full set of r
Hi all!
Here's the CPAN Testers daily report I have got today. I have some questions
regarding it.
On Saturday 20 September 2008, CPAN Tester Report Server wrote:
> Dear Shlomi Fish,
>
> CPAN Testers Notifications have changed. This mail now comes from a
> centralised server, and authors should
2008/9/11 Barbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Today I'm pleased to announce the launch of the CPAN Testers' "Collated
> Email Notification of Tester Reports for Authors Service" [1]
This rocks! By having one email a day with all the failure reports, I
get a better idea of which distributions people are
To make life a bit easier with dependencies, I've packaged the
remailer in its own distribution (and fixed a bug or two already).
App::CPAN::Testers::Remailer
Usage:
$ cpantest-remailer --author=DAGOLDEN --grade=FAIL --grade=UNKNOWN
-- David
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:39 PM, David Golden <[E
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 09:00:48AM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>
> Yeah, for he FAILs-only, I'd love to see the body of the report in the
> feed. And then a link to mail the reporter that would popup my mailer
> with the To: and Subject: headers filled out, plus maybe the NNTP
> archive l
On Sep 11, 2008, at 15:18, Michael G Schwern wrote:
There also doesn't appear to be a way to get just the failures so I
have to
figure out how to twiddle my RSS reader to filter out the passes.
Barbie says he's worked in a patch from me that will allow you to
subscribe to a feed with only
Hi,
2008/9/12 David Landgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Barbie wrote, some time around 11/09/2008 16:19:
>> Today I'm pleased to announce the launch of the CPAN Testers' "Collated
>> Email Notification of Tester Reports for Authors Service" [1], a
> Hmm, L is always a bit of a bastard to backronymise
Barbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Collated Email Notification of Tester Reports for Authors Service"
>
> [1] If you can think of a suitable word beginning with 'L' to replace
> 'Service' let me know ;)
Lounge - It's where I like to hang around. :-)
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTEC
* Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-11 22:40]:
> "CENTRAS" would probably google better than "CENTRAL"
It seems to be a moderately popular business name and also
appears to be a word in several languages. It won’t be as bad
as googling “CENTRAL” but it won’t be exactly ideal either.
Howev
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 7:32 PM, brian d foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just brainstorming for the moment, but if we had an option to forward
>> all your FAIL or UNKNOWN reports to the distribution's RT queue
>
> Ouch. Some people might want that, but only as an opt-in thing please.
Purely opt-
In article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David
Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The way it looks right now, I want my CC's back. :(
>
> Well, I guess we win some and we lose some.
>
> Just brainstorming for the moment, b
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> They'll be sent out early morning (~2am) UK time, so should be waiting
>> in you inbox first think in the morning.
>
> Ok, I have to wait until the beginning of the next day to fix the problem.
FYI, I have 90% of my P
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The way it looks right now, I want my CC's back. :(
Well, I guess we win some and we lose some.
Just brainstorming for the moment, but if we had an option to forward
all your FAIL or UNKNOWN reports to the distributio
Barbie wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 02:17:41PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>> Ick. I hope I'm missing something obvious maybe?
>
> The bit where I get flamed. Again. Thanks.
You're welcome. :)
Oh, you're in a hellish spot, I realize. And it sucks. Thank you very much
for putting so m
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 02:17:41PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> The way it looks right now, I want my CC's back. :(
My understanding of The Plan is that you will be able to get them back
"soon", once that bit is written.
--
David Cantrell | Reality Engineer, Ministry of Information
NANO
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 01:35:07PM -0700, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
> # from Randy J. Ray
> # on Thursday 11 September 2008 12:22:
> >> [1] If you can think of a suitable word beginning with 'L' to
> >> replace 'Service' let me know ;)
> >"Labors"?
> for "L"... I got nothing.
I spent far more time than
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 02:17:41PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
> Ick. I hope I'm missing something obvious maybe?
The bit where I get flamed. Again. Thanks.
Can you explain how you survived previously when testers would wait
several days before testing distributions? When you'd get a tri
David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2008, at 14:17, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
>> Because they all come in at one lump, I have to deal with them in one
>> lump.
>> There's no easy system to tell which ones I've dealt with (previously
>> I'd just
>> delete the mail) and which ones I haven't.
>>
>>
Barbie wrote, some time around 11/09/2008 16:19:
Today I'm pleased to announce the launch of the CPAN Testers' "Collated
Email Notification of Tester Reports for Authors Service" [1], a
[...]
[1] If you can think of a suitable word beginning with 'L' to replace
'Service' let me know ;)
Hmm,
On Sep 11, 2008, at 14:17, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Because they all come in at one lump, I have to deal with them in
one lump.
There's no easy system to tell which ones I've dealt with
(previously I'd just
delete the mail) and which ones I haven't.
The way it looks right now, I want my CC'
Barbie wrote:
> The notification system will run once a day and collate a list of the
> links to the reports via the web interface on the NNTP server. As such,
> you will no longer receive huge reports in your inbox, but at most just
> one email a day containing a list of links to your reports. You
# from Randy J. Ray
# on Thursday 11 September 2008 12:22:
>> [1] If you can think of a suitable word beginning with 'L' to
>> replace 'Service' let me know ;)
>
>"Labors"?
"CENTRAS" would probably google better than "CENTRAL", but my thought
was "too bad Xs aren't cool anymore (hmm, but could y
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Barbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [1] If you can think of a suitable word beginning with 'L' to replace
> 'Service' let me know ;)
>
"Labors"?
I got my first such note this morning, and greatly appreciate it!
--
Randy J. Ray / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Silicon Valley
On 11 Sep 2008, at 15:19, Barbie wrote:
[snip good stuff about test reports]
Thank you! :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
* On Mon, Feb 11 2008, Andy Lester wrote:
> http://log.perl.org/2008/02/no-more-email-d.html
>
> Well I guess that settles that. :)
This is unrelated to the usual whining about receiving FAIL reports in
your inbox. Those are sent directly by the smoker, not via the
cpan-testers mailing list.
The
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
> Why is it "die 'OS unsupported'" in one case
My understanding is that there was already special-case code to support
that, but adding loads more bits of magic text would be unwieldy. It
would also require everyone to upgrade whenever new magic text appears
on the scene, whi
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 09:59:11AM -0700, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
> It would be nice if the reports were somehow queryable WRT machine
> config and failure mode. Sorting through a slew of reports is a real
> pain when some have no usable information (like an error message) and
> others are just po
On 10/21/07, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why is it "die 'OS unsupported'" in one case and "exit 0 unless happy()"
> in the other? Seems like they should both be dying.
Parsing for "OS unsupported" or "No support for OS" was introduced as
a heuristic into CPANPLUS a couple years ago
# from David Golden
# on Sunday 21 October 2007 08:30:
>As I see it, the root of
>"the problem" is that there are many ways for things to fail, and
>authors tend to object to getting "FAIL" grades (in big capital
>letters) for things outside their control.
It would be nice if the reports were som
On May 20, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Matisse Enzer wrote:
I uploaded a new version of Perl::Metrics::Simple (0.032) and
noticed that 3 failing reports from CPAN testers, all because I
didn't include a Makefile.PL and the generated one (from my
Build.PL) didn't include the prerequisites.
Here is
Matisse Enzer wrote:
So - what's the "right" way to remedy this?
- The author (that's me!) provides a Makefile.PL as well as Build.PL?
Yes.
> - Fix something in the CPAN tester system
There is no one CPAN testing system. This is a good thing, as different
setups will ferret out differe
# from Matisse Enzer
# on Sunday 20 May 2007 08:55 am:
>So - what's the "right" way to remedy this?
>
> - The author (that's me!) provides a Makefile.PL as well as Build.PL?
> - Fix something in the CPAN tester system?
> - Other?
> - Some combination of the above ? :-)
http://www.nntp.perl.or
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 08:55:32AM -0700, Matisse Enzer wrote:
> I uploaded a new version of Perl::Metrics::Simple (0.032) and noticed
> that 3 failing reports from CPAN testers, all because I didn't
> include a Makefile.PL and the generated one (from my Build.PL) didn't
> include the prerequ
Quoting Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've noticed that http://search.cpan.org/~ovid/HOP-Parser-0.01/,
> amongst other modules, has no CPAN test results appearing even though
> CPAN tester reports are coming in. I've seen this for other modules,
> too.
>
> Is there an announced reason for this I m
On Wed, November 2, 2005 11:48 am, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
> Ovid wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've noticed that http://search.cpan.org/~ovid/HOP-Parser-0.01/,
>> amongst other modules, has no CPAN test results appearing even though
>> CPAN tester reports are coming in. I've seen this for other modu
Ovid wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've noticed that http://search.cpan.org/~ovid/HOP-Parser-0.01/,
> amongst other modules, has no CPAN test results appearing even though
> CPAN tester reports are coming in. I've seen this for other modules,
> too.
>
> Is there an announced reason for this I missed or i
On 10/13/05, James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Landgren wrote:
> > Fergal Daly wrote:
> >
> >> http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/257538
> >>
> >> shows a fail for Test-Benchmark but the fail seems to be caused by
> >> CPANPLUS not installing dependencies:
> >
> >
> >
On 10/12/05, David Landgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fergal Daly wrote:
> > http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/257538
> >
> > shows a fail for Test-Benchmark but the fail seems to be caused by
> > CPANPLUS not installing dependencies:
>
> Apparently it's a bug in CPANPLUS that sto
David Landgren wrote:
Fergal Daly wrote:
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/257538
shows a fail for Test-Benchmark but the fail seems to be caused by
CPANPLUS not installing dependencies:
Apparently it's a bug in CPANPLUS that stops it from keeping track of
grand children dep
Fergal Daly wrote:
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/257538
shows a fail for Test-Benchmark but the fail seems to be caused by
CPANPLUS not installing dependencies:
Apparently it's a bug in CPANPLUS that stops it from keeping track of
grand children dependencies. @INC winds up
41 matches
Mail list logo
