--- Matisse Enzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A side-note to keep in mind: If we every want to be able to convert
> TAP to the XML format produced by the JUnit ant task (this way for
> example CruiseControl could more easily read the results of Perl
> tests) then it becomes desirable to get
# from Ovid
# on Sunday 09 September 2007 01:15 am:
>In jUnit, each "test" is a method which
>contains a number of individual assert.
Cue "nested tests" discussion.
Oh well, at least the timestamp committee came to a conclusion.
--Eric
--
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved i
On 9 Sep 2007, at 11:38, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
# from Ovid
# on Sunday 09 September 2007 01:15 am:
In jUnit, each "test" is a method which
contains a number of individual assert.
Cue "nested tests" discussion.
Nested tests: when we get a moment I'm going to implement my
proposal. If people
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Sorry for the long output, but I hope it helps to state my confusion.
I see no failing tests, yet it states "Failed 5/57 testprograms"
t\00wmcheck#
# Tk platform:MSWin32
# XFT:no
t\00wmcheck...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9 Sep 2007, at 13:24, Abe Timmerman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Sorry for the long output, but I hope it helps to state my confusion.
I see no failing tests, yet it states "Failed 5/57 testprograms"
What are
On Sep 9, 2007, at 1:15 AM, Ovid wrote:
--- Matisse Enzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A side-note to keep in mind: If we every want to be able to convert
TAP to the XML format produced by the JUnit ant task (this way for
example CruiseControl could more easily read the results of Perl
tests) t
--- Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > C:\download\Tk-804.027-9793>perl595 -Mblib t\Kr.t
> > 1..0 # Skipped: locale's 'iso-8859-1' cannot represent Korean.
>
> The TAP grammar we're working to has it as /^1..0\s+#\s*SKIP\b/i - so
>
> Skippped doesn't match.
>
> It occurs to me that
On 9 Sep 2007, at 22:04, Ovid wrote:
As I recall, we've hit the same problem with another module (POE?) and
I'm thinking that extending the TAP grammar here might be the key.
Specifically, consider this:
1..0 # SKIP some reason
The '1..0' is 'skip all' and the 'SKIP' is redundant except that
Matisse Enzer wrote:
> There certainly is a mapping problem and I don't have a perfect
> solution, and enabling Perl test output to be understood by
> CruiseControl (for example) is a valuable thing, in my opinion.
Seems to be, knowing nothing about CruiseControl, that rather than trying to
match
Andy Armstrong wrote:
> On 9 Sep 2007, at 22:04, Ovid wrote:
>> As I recall, we've hit the same problem with another module (POE?) and
>> I'm thinking that extending the TAP grammar here might be the key.
>> Specifically, consider this:
>>
>> 1..0 # SKIP some reason
>>
>> The '1..0' is 'skip all'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andy Armstrong wrote:
Hi Andy,
> On 9 Sep 2007, at 13:24, Abe Timmerman wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>
>> Sorry for the long output, but I hope it helps to state my confusion.
>
>> I see no failing tests, yet it states "Failed 5/57 testprograms"
>
> What
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9 Sep 2007, at 22:57, Abe Timmerman wrote:
I was running dmake test for Tk. Under CPAN this would have lead to a
non-install, although no tests really failed.
Thanks. When I get a moment I'll fire up a Win32 box and see if I can
reproduce it w
As of TAP::Harness r465, the --jobs switch to prove enables
parallelization of your test suite.
http://svn.hexten.net/tapx/trunk
http://scratchcomputing.com/svn/TAP-Harness-Parallel/trunk
Note that your test suite may or may not play nicely with that. Have
you ever run them in parallel bef
While you are at it would you care to try to install modules from CPAN
onto Active Perl running on Vista? It just seems a world of grief;
although identical installs are great under XP. I just flat gave up
using Vista for Perl. I feel sad, but what can one do?
Andy Armstrong wrote:
-B
On Sep 9, 2007, at 2:53 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Seems to be, knowing nothing about CruiseControl, that rather than
trying to
match them up exactly to step back and say "what do we want out of
CruiseControl and how compatible do we need to be to get it"?
Just close enough so that Cruise
15 matches
Mail list logo
