2010/1/3 Eric Wilhelm
> >>>add one more level and make
> >> > the tab be "History", then history.html is a page which says " >> > href="phalanx">Phalanx 100 started in 2003..."
> >> >
> >> > Perhaps somebody would like to put together a more comprehensive
> >> > QA timeline including the developm
Hi,
2010/1/3 Eric Wilhelm
> Am I alone here in thinking that we should be using the Onion trademark
> rather than O'Reilly's trademark camel on the perl.org sites?
>
This is what I told the TPF marketing list when they asked...
---
The goal for www.perl.org is to encourage new people into Per
On Sunday 03 January 2010 at 03:21, Leo Lapworth wrote:
> Maybe someone could get a grant to hire someone/a company with design skills
> to come up with a better logo than the onion?
It seems rather unlikely that TPF will go through the business of applying for
another trademark because you don'
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 11:40 AM, chromatic wrote:
>
> If the design of perl.org had been up to me, I'd have spent much more time
> promoting the Perl brand instead of the proprietary brand of a privately held
> corporation.
For better or for worse, the Perl brand *is* the camel. Either get
O'Reil
Leo Lapworth wrote:
> Maybe someone could get a grant to hire someone/a company with design skills
> to come up with a better logo than the onion?
I always thought that something to do with pearls would be nice. Kinda
like this
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/47/La_nascita_di_Vene
* Leo Lapworth [2010-01-03T06:21:21]
> Almost every person (of a dozen non-techies & .net developers in my office)
> I showed the Onion to were confused by it. They thought it was a 'sad' thing
> about making you cry, or just irrelevant. With the camel they thought it was
> a 'nice' image, e.g. th
* Pedro Figueiredo [2010-01-03T07:06:19]
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 11:40 AM, chromatic wrote:
> >
> > If the design of perl.org had been up to me, I'd have spent much more time
> > promoting the Perl brand instead of the proprietary brand of a privately
> > held corporation.
>
> For better or for
* Shawn H Corey [2010-01-03T07:22:01]
> Leo Lapworth wrote:
> > Maybe someone could get a grant to hire someone/a company with design skills
> > to come up with a better logo than the onion?
>
> I always thought that something to do with pearls would be nice.
The problems with pearls include: (a
Ricardo Signes wrote:
> The problems with pearls include: (a) promoting mispeling Perl as Pearl and
> (b)
> a pearl reduces, in its simplest depiction, to a circle. It's not very
> visually distinctive.
They're pronounced the same way. Perl as a pearl is a pun, a play on
words. (Of course, som
--- On Sun, 3/1/10, chromatic wrote:
> From: chromatic
>
> > Maybe someone could get a grant to hire someone/a
> company with design skills
> > to come up with a better logo than the onion?
>
> It seems rather unlikely that TPF will go through the
> business of applying for
> another trademar
--- On Sun, 3/1/10, Shawn H Corey wrote:
> From: Shawn H Corey
> > An onion can be pretty pared down before you lose
> sight of what it is.
>
> I pared many an onion and you loose sight of it when the
> tears start to
> flow. :)
And let's face it: to many people, onions stink and they *do* m
Ovid wrote:
> What is our concern vis-a-vis the camel and how can we approach O'Reilly
> regarding this concern?
http://oreilly.com/pub/a/oreilly/perl/usage/
Note the part about permissi...@oreilly.com
--
Just my 0.0002 million dollars worth,
Shawn
Programming is as much about organiza
Ovid wrote:
> And let's face it: to many people, onions stink and they *do* make you cry.
> That's not a positive association.
>
> Perl: the language that will make you cry.
Shrek: Ogres arePerls is like onions.
Donkey: They stink?
Shrek: Yes. No.
Donkey: Oh, they make you cry.
Shrek: No.
Don
Ovid writes:
> customer perception is important. ... From a marketing perspective,
> the camel wins hand-down. From a legal perspective, what are the pros
> and cons?
This definitely is important -- but as something which affects the Perl
community as a whole, this aspect of the discussion see
On Sunday 03 January 2010 at 09:23, Ovid wrote:
I would be happy to continue this discussion an another list; which one is
most appropriate?
> What is our concern vis-a-vis the camel
Any use of the camel in a fashion which may cause confusion with products,
services, or initiatives of the tra
15 matches
Mail list logo
