On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 10:41:29PM -0800, Jeffrey Thalhammer wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2011, at 7:10 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > You might want to record the type of repository, even if there's
> > only "CPAN" for now. It might be worth differentiating "CPAN" from
> > "BackPAN".
> > The structure i
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:47 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
> There's at least one other significant difference: CPAN has an
> up-to-date index. BackPAN doesn't.
Further to that point, I think the idea of "the index" should be
separated from the idea of "the repository".
The repository may contain a
Sorry for the long delay. Lately I'm task-switching at a slow pace. Also, I'm
quoting you out of order.
* Michael G Schwern [2011-11-30T17:16:47]
> RJBS wrote,
> > The only case when the programmer needs to know about the Mouse
> > underpinnings is when hacking on the dist itself, not not ever
David Golden writes:
> I plan to expand further on this idea of separation at the QA
> Hackathon in the spring (if I don't start working on it sooner). I'd
> like to get all CPAN clients able to use an index completely separate
> from a given repository, where the index could, for example, provid
> David Golden writes:
> > I plan to expand further on this idea of separation at the QA
> > Hackathon in the spring (if I don't start working on it sooner). I'd
> > like to get all CPAN clients able to use an index completely separate
> > from a given repository, where the index could, for examp
On 12/05/2011 11:05 AM, David Golden wrote:
Among other things, this would allow a project to freeze (and version
control) a CPAN index and use it for repeatable deployment of a
specific dependency chain.
Isn't this what carton is trying to do?
https://github.com/miyagawa/carton
--
Michael Pe
In article <20111205154758.gh17...@bytemark.barnyard.co.uk>, David
Cantrell wrote:
> There's at least one other significant difference: CPAN has an
> up-to-date index. BackPAN doesn't.
Well, CPAN's index is also BackPAN's index. That is, neither of them
include all of the files in the repositor
As a result of the discussions, I'm now reconsidering using Mouse in TB2. Its
interesting, it's not for any of the reasons I thought, but for a distressing
encapsulation breech built into Moose.
The main concern is that the fact that we're using Mouse leaks out. We must
document that we're using
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> As a result of the discussions, I'm now reconsidering using Mouse in TB2. Its
> interesting, it's not for any of the reasons I thought, but for a distressing
> encapsulation breech built into Moose.
>
> The main concern is that the fact t
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Michael Peters wrote:
>> Among other things, this would allow a project to freeze (and version
>> control) a CPAN index and use it for repeatable deployment of a
>> specific dependency chain.
>
> Isn't this what carton is trying to do?
> https://github.com/miyagawa/
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
> We have a tool to do this, at work. It isn't really in a state that I'd
> suggest others use it, but I would love to see something better than it become
> popular, as it has been *very* useful. So, I will be happy to help, at least
> by tel
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:26 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> *How* much longer? Does the upcoming MOP include syntax (class, method, role
> keywords) and stuff like roles? Will one be able to drop Mouse in favor of it?
I just asked doy. It will support all of that, but not on older
versions of perl
12 matches
Mail list logo
