> "Randal" == Randal L Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Randal> Go to swikis.net
errr... swiki.net - sorry!
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical wri
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> A. To be able to use Test::More's functions without ever printing a 1..foo
> test header.
And it turns out I also need to suppress all the stuff in
Test::Builder::_ending (I simply bailed at line 838).
So basically, I need an "I know what the fork I'm d
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Have you tried the Test::Builder thing yet? I think you should be
> able to solve your forking problem like so:
Working on it
> use Test::More tests => 10; # or whatever.
Except this needs to printed just once in the parent _before_ any tes
On 29 Sep 2001, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
[...]
> The downside is that all contributors have to also be registered, if
> you want to control upload access. Or you can just let public
> scribble, like many swikis.
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WhyWikiWorks
:-)
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen, http://a
> "Michael" == Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 06:52:55PM +0100, Tony Bowden wrote:
>> You should be able to write your own wiki in a couple of hours.
>> I have one based around Class::DBI that I knocked up in a morning...
Michael> All I really
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 01:25:20PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> > Thinking about it, you could probably move the module loads into the
> > test scripts and have them just run the basic test, which would, in
> > turn, probably mean you could get away with just using Test::More/Simple
>
> But I like
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 06:52:55PM +0100, Tony Bowden wrote:
> You should be able to write your own wiki in a couple of hours.
> I have one based around Class::DBI that I knocked up in a morning...
All I really care is that it:
A) works
B) has some sort of history and rollback
C) I don't have to
On 29 Sep 2001, Piers Cawley wrote:
> If it's not a dumb question, why are you doing it that way? If you
> were using PerlUnit, aka Test::Unit::TestCase, you could do something
> like:
Why am I doing what? Forking and starting tests at weird offsets?
The forking is cause I need to load differe
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 01:39:51PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Given Wiki's security model (or lack thereof) that is kinda silly.
It's very deliberate for the Wiki to have approximately zero security...
> I'm poking around a bit at other wikis, maybe TWiki if they didn't
> have such an obn
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 12:05:49PM +0200, Tels wrote:
> Is there _any_ way I can operate the Wiki with a username _without_ having
> cookies?
Use a browser that lets you selectively turn cookies on and off on a
per-site basis. Or do what I do, have the browser clear them all at
the end of each s
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 10:39:50AM +0100, Paul Marquess wrote:
> The subject says Compress::Zlib, but the body doesn't. Which is the typo?
The subject. I'd thrown it into the list, I remember there having
been some trouble with it a number of months ago, but then realized
you're actively maintai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On 29-Sep-01 Michael G Schwern tried to scribble about:
> One of the best ways to pound 5.8 release candidates will be to run it
> and 5.6.1 against heaps of CPAN modules and make sure that everything
> which works on 5.6.1 works on 5.8.0.
>
> In anticip
From: Michael G Schwern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Archive::Tar and Archive::Zip are very essential modules. You use
> them every time you run the CPAN shell. However, their implementation
> could use a little work and the authors could use a little help.
>
> In all cases the need better te
13 matches
Mail list logo
