On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:02:27PM +0100, Mattia Barbon wrote:
> > Code inside the BEGIN blocks has $^C set?? Or are they just not being
> > run at all? Either of those are bugs. But there's a third
>
> The code inside the begin blocks has $^C set ( as it should ), and they
> are being run
>
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 05:03:46PM +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > The name of the function and order of arguments are all up for
> > discussion.
>
> Thanks, applied.
>
> About the name: I think it's an awful name... doesn't tell me at least
> at all what it's for (except maybe for doubling
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 05:35:04PM +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 05:31:49PM +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 05:18:10PM +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > > > PS There was also a bug in runperl(). All switches were being lost.
> > >
> > >
perlcc seems to be dropping BEGIN blocks entirely, that's the problem.
# foo.plx
BEGIN {
print "foo\n";
}
print "bar\n";
$ bleadperl foo.plx
foo
bar
$ perlcc foo.plx
$ ./a.out
bar
The result from the compiled program should be the same as the
original. For some reason
