David Hiltz wrote:
>
> > I agree, Tk is still the only option for most serious projects
> > (Win32::GUI is still, after all, a beta); though it still isn't
> > entirely stable, either.
>
> Nothing is.
Yeah, but menubars still aren't handled right (a grid of menu
buttons? *sheesh*), window fo
I would also be interested in seeing this code, maybe we could help get the
bugs worked out if we had the code.
Tim
-
Tim Thomas
Unix Systems Administrator
Lockheed Martin EIS ยท Denver
Would it be possible to get a copy of the GUI designer??
Mike Kangas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Hiltz wrote:
> > I agree, Tk is still the only option for most serious projects
> > (Win32::GUI is still, after all, a beta); though it still isn't
> > entirely stable, either.
>
> Nothing is.
>
> > A
> I agree, Tk is still the only option for most serious projects
> (Win32::GUI is still, after all, a beta); though it still isn't
> entirely stable, either.
Nothing is.
> Also, be aware that the Tk widgets are ported from XWindows,
> and are similar, but not identical, to the familiar Windows
I heard (read, actually) somewhere that TK does not intigrate as well with Windows as
does Win32::GUI. That is, it is more difficult to maipulate other windows and objects
on the desktop in TK.
I don't have first-hand experience with TK to support this however.
-Glenn
At 10:08 A
I agree, Tk is still the only option for most serious projects
(Win32::GUI is still, after all, a beta); though it still isn't
entirely stable, either.
Also, be aware that the Tk widgets are ported from XWindows,
and are similar, but not identical, to the familiar Windows
controls. Tk also tends
> Plus
>
> TK has the look of Linux and Win32::GUI has well the windows look.
> If you ask me TK looks out of place on a windows machine.
Somethings are closer to Windows:
The checkboxes use checkmarks not little rectangular boxes and radiobuttons
are round and not diamond
I am hoping to finish off pre-1.0 this weekend. I will try to have this
working
with at least insert, delete, update, and select statements by monday.
"Philip A. Larson" wrote:
> I tried your updated PerlSQL program and everything looks good but the SQL
> command function. I entered:
>
> "select
Plus
TK has the look of Linux and Win32::GUI has well the windows
look. If you
ask me TK looks out of place on a windows machine.
David Hiltz wrote:
> > This may be a silly question and please let me know if it is but I was
> > wondering what the major differences where [besides syn
Using ActivePerl 519, PDK 1.2.3, and Win32::GUI 425, I am experiencing
screen degradation problems when I run my perl executables on Novell and
Windows 95, but not on Windows NT. I use the SendMessage() function to
limit the number of characters entered into textfields. I also use a fixed
font (C
> This may be a silly question and please let me know if it is but I was
> wondering what the major differences where [besides syntax] between Perl/TK
> and Win32::GUI. Obviously, the latter is only available on Windows but are
> there any other reasons to use one over the other on the Windows pla
I tried your updated PerlSQL program and everything looks good but the SQL
command function. I entered:
"select [fname] from employee" and "select fname from employee where fname =
'Paul'"
on a DSN setup on the Pubs database and nothing happened.
Are quotes around the select statement required,
This may be a silly question and please let me know if it is but I was
wondering what the major differences where [besides syntax] between Perl/TK
and Win32::GUI. Obviously, the latter is only available on Windows but are
there any other reasons to use one over the other on the Windows platform?
13 matches
Mail list logo
