I'd like to second the "wow". I've been lurking on the list for two years,
and I wanted to say how impressive this is. The promise of Parrot seems like
a fantasy, and here you are with most of Python running at better speed than
on it's own interpreter. It's gone from a fantasy to a defect list.
Clark C. Evans wrote:
Wow. I'm impressed you got anywhere near this far! Your work sounds
very promising, a great way to validate Parrot's value proposition.
Thanks.
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 12:24:48PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
|
| >>> False=42
But that's not a bug. If one assignes "42" to F
Wow. I'm impressed you got anywhere near this far! Your work sounds
very promising, a great way to validate Parrot's value proposition.
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 12:24:48PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
| And there is of course the question, if we should really be
| "bug"-compatible
|
| >>> False
At 12:24 PM +0200 7/24/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Below is the last summary of the attempt to implement enough of
Python to run the Pie-thon benchmarks - within 5 weeks. Four and a
half of seven programs are running.
Albeit this experiment did fail, it IMHO has brought Parrot a lot
further. Val
At 10:13 AM -0700 7/24/04, Tim Howell wrote:
Does this mean that Dan is conceeding to Guido, or am I missing
something?
Yep, that's about it.
Also, when/where at OSCON is all of this supposed to take place?
Python lightning talks.
--
Dan
-
Sugalski
Subject: Pie-thon state 5 - and final
Below is the last summary of the attempt to implement enough of Python
to run the Pie-thon benchmarks - within 5 weeks. Four and a half of
seven programs are running.
Albeit this experiment did fail, it IMHO has brought Parrot a lot
further. Valuable
Below is the last summary of the attempt to implement enough of Python
to run the Pie-thon benchmarks - within 5 weeks. Four and a half of
seven programs are running.
Albeit this experiment did fail, it IMHO has brought Parrot a lot
further. Valuable interals like integer->bigint promotion are
