Hey there, sorry about not responding. My mailer hid this message from
me. I was actually about to reply asking what the deal was. ;)
chromatic wrote:
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 13:41, Aaron Sherman wrote:
This contains the Makefile, README, .pg grammar, a -harness.pir that
executes
Markus Triska wrote:
Aaron Sherman writes:
+Written in 2006 by Aaron Sherman, and distrbuted
Typo: distributed
You are correct, sir.
This was not, in fact some strange attempt to seize control of the
Parrot codebase ;)
chromatic wrote:
On Thursday 28 September 2006 14:51, Markus Triska wrote:
Allison Randal writes:
mini transformation language to use in the compiler tools.
For what purpose, roughly? I've some experience with rule-based
peep-hole optimisations. If it's in that area, I volunteer.
That's
that others can benefit from a simple example,
+and so that anyone who updates PGE can see if it affects the ability
+to handle the example given in that article.
+
+Written in 2006 by Aaron Sherman, and distrbuted under the same terms
+as the rest of the Parrot distribution that this should have come
+with.
byte-code, which is JITing to
machine code. Not really ideal.
--
Aaron Sherman
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Siracusa wrote:
On 8/23/06 4:09 PM, Aaron Sherman wrote:
here's the problem with that: llvm is a very light layer, but it's yet another
layer. To put it between parrot and hardware would mean that parrot is JITing
to LLVM byte-code, which is JITing to machine code. Not really ideal
On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 08:45 -0700, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:48:59AM -0400, Will Coleda wrote:
The way you phrase the question, you're not going to get any of these
answers. Who is programming parrot on their *physical* VT100? =-).
The primary reason for an 80
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 01:51, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Aaron Sherman wrote:
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 08:58 +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Here is some example P5 source from pp_pow in pp.c:
I presume that Ponie eventually will run Parrot opcodes. pp_pow() is
like all these functions part
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 08:58 +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Nicholas Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1 bit for SVf_IOK
1 bit for SVf_NOK
1 bit for SVf_POK
1 bit for SVf_ROK
I'd not mess around with (or introduce) flag bits. The more that this
would only cover perl5 PMCs. Presuming that
]
Just thought I'd pass that along, in case it's of interest. I'm not a CL
guy at all, so I wouldn't even know how type inference helps
performance.
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 01:50 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been trying to examine the i386 code generator to see how
feasible it would be to create an AMD64 code generator.
[...]
I'm going to copy the i386 path to an a64 path and have at
to be shared, since shared
data is a fundamental piece of any threaded application's assumptions.
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 13:22 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Anyway, a number of people I deeply respect (and who do this sort of
thing for a living, at deep levels) have told me flat-out that we're
better not having a security system than we are trying to roll our
own, and the common response
in the large, and map closer to what Parrot wants
to do than VMS.
Don't get me wrong. I loved VMS back in the day. It was a pain in the
ass at times, but what isn't. It's just that it's not a VM trying to
execute byte-code... it's an operating system which directly manages
hardware.
--
Aaron Sherman
is both complex
and highly beneficial for all concerned.
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
will
probably be the compiler that first compiles the ultimate Perl 6
compiler, but thereafter Pugs will no longer be the primary reference
implementation. This is documented by the Pugs team at
http://svn.perl.org/perl6/pugs/trunk/docs/01Overview.html
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 07:55, Sam Ruby wrote:
I've been trying to make sense of Python's scoping in the context of
Parrot, and posted a few thoughts on my weblog:
http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2004/10/18/Python-Parrot-and-Lexical-Scopes
It seems like everything on that page boils down to:
over more complex tokens than just
characters). Either way, the result is an FSA which can be executed (aka
simulated) by invoking its continuation.
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 10:29, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've done quite a lot of thinking about Parrot's rx_compile op, as I was
thinking about implementing it.
Given that rx_compile syntax and semantics aren't really final and
second that compiling a rx
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 10:44, Matt Fowles wrote:
I am of the opinion that we should treat regular expression as simply
another language. Thus one can register different compilers for
different regex syntaxes and we do not need to add more opcodes for
them.
That is essentially what I've
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 12:10, Matt Diephouse wrote:
I'm still working on a new Forth implementation...
Forth has a word `key` that gets one character from stdin. It
shouldn't wait for a newline to get the character. Is there any way to
implement this currently in PIR?
You can't do this in a
On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 14:03, Sam Ruby wrote:
Here's a script that will run in both Python and Perl. It simply will
return different results.
print 1 + 2,\n,;
print 45%s8 % 7,\n,;
print 45 / 7 ,\n,;
print ['a','b','c'],\n,;
print ['a'] + ['b']
.
If scan reaches end of buffer, return that position.
(save-excursion
(beginning-of-line)
(if n (next-line n))
(point)))
no?
--
Aaron Sherman
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 18:22, John Paul Wallington wrote:
Jerome Quelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And the minibuffer tells me:
Symbol's function definition is void: line-beginning-position
I'm using xemacs 21.4.14
You could put something like:
(defalias 'line-beginning-position
to want
to use something akin to the Perl 6 model, since it's designed to be
able to emulate the Python, Ruby and Scheme models.
--
Aaron Sherman
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 03:53, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
We already have the Random PMC with vtables to create random numbers.
There's really no need to have opcodes too. If there aren't serious
arguments for keeping these opcodes, they'll be removed for the release.
Didn't you and I specifically
On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 13:04, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
For Perl, I get that. But for Python, AFAICT, namespaces are
*supposed* to be in the same, er, namespace, as variables. No?
Yes, and what's more the suggestion of using :: in Parrot won't work
perfectly either (I'm pretty sure that there
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 12:05, Jeff Clites wrote:
On Sep 28, 2004, at 7:02 AM, Aaron Sherman wrote:
why not have each language do it the way
that language is comfortable (e.g. place it in the regular namespace as
a variable like Python or place it in the regular namespace, but
append
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 10:03, KJ wrote:
So, my question is, why would one need lexical pads anyway (why are they
there)?
They are there so that variables can be found by name in a lexically
scoped way. One example, in Perl 5, of this need is:
my $foo = 1;
return sub { $foo ++
, this would be much less embarassing ;-)
However, the point is still sound, and that WILL work in P6, as I
understand it.
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 07:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Aaron Sherman wrote:
Sized low-level types are named most generally by appending the number
of bits to a generic low-level type name:
[...] int1 int2 int4 int8 int16 int32 int64
Ok, so Parrot doesn't have
Chunder;
...
sub yawn { my $self = shift; print Now yawning\n }
would be invoked as normal.
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 12:40, Larry Wall wrote:
have to be careful to separate architectural parameters from policy
parameters. An architectural parameter says your integers are 32 bits.
A policy parameter says you want to install the documentation in the
/foo/bar/baz directory. Cross
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 17:40, Rhys Weatherley wrote:
On Thursday 09 September 2004 02:40 am, Larry Wall wrote:
An interesting question would be whether we can bootstrap a Parrot
cross-compile database using autoconf's *data* without buying into the
shellism of autoconf. Or give someone
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 08:00, Jens Rieks wrote:
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 07:52, Robert Schwebel wrote:
Would autoconf/automake be an option for the C part of parrot?
No, its only available on a few systems.
Ok, this is probably a moot conversation because Metaconfig
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 09:26, Dan Sugalski wrote:
*) Namespaces are hierarchical
So we can have [foo; bar; baz] for a namespace. Woo hoo and all
that. It'd map to the equivalent perl namespace of foo::bar::baz.
[...]
It's also possible to hoist a sub-space up a few levels, so that the
[IO]
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 11:59, Andrew Dougherty wrote:
Both autoconf and metaconfig assume a unix-like environment. Ambitious
plans for parrot's configure include non-unix environments too, such as
VMS and all the ports where perl5 uses a manually-generated config.*
template.
autoconf assumes
in Parrot_load_bytecode_sc (cur_opcode=0x8980b70,
Hope this helps!
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
languages to implement such features? Should
there be a set of (highly JIT-optimizable) PMCs that present sized type
features, should the core register types be sizable somehow or should
languages just be left to roll their own PMCs that do whatever they
want?
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior
ld_shared = $Config{lddlflags},
ar= $Config{ar},
ranlib= $Config{ranlib},
make = $Config{make},
make_set_make = $Config{make_set_make},
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying
On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 18:29, Aaron Sherman wrote:
On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 12:42, Dan Sugalski wrote:
If someone could go through and make a list of what info configure.pl
pulls from perl, I'll start writing (or snagging :) the probing code
to do it ourselves, so we can be perl-free
On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 18:29, Aaron Sherman wrote:
I think right now that info is all in config/init/data.pl, and it's
Scratch that. I was grepping through the tree for Config{ which turns
out to not catch the way %Config is used in most of the tree... I'll
have a look and get you the details
On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 17:00, Larry Wall wrote:
: Let's get concrete:
:
: rule foo { a $x:=(b*) c }
: abbabc
:
: So, if I understand Parrot and Perl 6 correctly (heh, fat chance), a
: slight modification to the calling convention of the closure that
: represents a rule (possibly
On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 11:27, Felix Gallo wrote:
Although the next regex engine has to deal with the horribly
crufty new perl6 syntax
Keep in mind that Perl 6 regexen are really just Perl 5 regexen with a
call stack and backtracking control. Absolutely everything else that I
see in P6 is either
Ok, I get it now, thanks Larry.
I do still think that you can do what I suggest, but I realize that it's
not as easy as handing around a single pad, you would actually need to
maintain either a list of pads (outside of the built-in pad stack,
probably inside of C$0) or a list of C$0s, each with
On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 14:40, Ozgun Erdogan wrote:
Currently, we're using perl-5.6.1 and are having problems with memory
leaks - thanks to reference counting.
You'll have to break reference loops explicitely.
If only I had known where those circular references are. I have a
circular
On Sat, 2004-08-28 at 16:17, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Time to finish this one and ensconce the API into the embedding interface.
That reminds me, I was reading P6PE yesterday, and I came across a
scary bit on loading of shared libraries. The statement was made that
Parrot would search the current
On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 11:17, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Comments welcome,
Honestly, much of this goes beyond my meager understanding of Parrot
internals, but I've read it, and most of it seems reasonable. Just on
point where you may not have considered a logical alternative:
=head2 2.6. Morphing
On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 16:07, Larry Wall wrote:
I see one other potential gotcha with respect to backtracking and
closures. In P6, a closure can declare a hypothetical variable
that is restored only if the closure exits unsuccessfully. Within
a rule, an embedded closure is unsuccessful if it
On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 16:33, Aaron Sherman wrote:
rule foo { a $x:=(b*) c }
In the rest of my message I acted as if that read:
rule foo { a $x:=(b+) c }
so, we may as well pretend that that's what I meant to say ;-)
--
781-324-3772
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ajs.com/~ajs
Please let me know who is appropriate for this, and whatever you do,
please don't reply to / CC the list. We don't need to bog down the works
with discussion of spam filtering.
I'm noticing that mail from perl6-* is showing up with this header:
Received-SPF: softfail (mail.ajs.com: transitioning
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Stephane Peiry wrote:
g_return_val_if_fail (G_IS_OBJECT (gobject), 0); Fails here
gtk shouldn't make assumption on the user_data argument IMHO.
The whole idea behind callbacks is, that there is a userdata argument
that get's passed through
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 15:57, Felix Gallo wrote:
Dan writes:
sub foo :come_from('+', int, int) {}
One problem with MMD in general, and return specifically, is
'what happens if multiple M match the same D requirements?
i.e.,
That's a question, not a problem. It's easy to answer
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 16:22, Felix Gallo wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 04:08:34PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
1) We're going to have MMD for functions soon
2) Function invocation and return continuation invocation's
essentially identical
3) Therefore returning from a sub/method can do
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 14:14, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Additionally if we have source text which is
Latin-n, EBCDIC, ASCII, or whatever we must be
able to convert it with no loss to Unicode.
(Which I believe is now doable with Unicode 4.0)
Losslessly converting Unicode to
I don't want to argue per-se (that doesn't do anyone any good), so if
your mind is made up, that's cool... still, I think there's some value
in exploring the options, so read on if you're so inclined.
On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 04:40, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Converting Unicode to non-Unicode
On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 13:43, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Cool. On the Unix platforms we exec off 'sh' and pass in parameters
(so we get command parameters split up right, IIRC). I'm presuming we
don't do the same for Windows, so I'll make it the plain command and
hope it all works out.
Well,
On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 14:11, Aaron Sherman wrote:
Parrot could
easily make the distinction based on being passed a string value or a
PMC array of some sort and end up with roughly the same functionality as
Perl (though Perl itself would not use this as-is, as it decides further
based
for this sort of thing
(or the Microsoft naming scheme for C#/.Net Framework for that matter)?
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Perl Toolsmith
http://www.ajs.com/~ajs/resume.html
not
become read-only
e) true read-onlyness will probably most often be optimized at the
language level by storing cached values in typed registers anyway
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Perl Toolsmith
http://www.ajs.com/~ajs/resume.html
---BeginMessage---
On Sat
of a problem that is, I'm not sure.
As for threading, I think the simple layering is easiest, and again, you
create the PMC layered if you want that functionality (e.g. for
locking).
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me
appears to be 81.196.122.75.
--
Aaron Sherman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for GPG info. Fingerprint:
www.ajs.com/~ajs6DC1 F67A B9FB 2FBA D04C 619E FC35 5713 2676 CEAF
Visit my Mushroom Journals at http://mush.ajs.com/
, then of course parrot event
works just fine. If you're talking about searching your code, then
that's another matter.
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
to suggestions here...
How about skippy?
Seriously, I would say that event is about as abstract as it comes. Even
the proposed message is, in some ways, LESS abstract.
What's the specific sort of case events don't seem to cover? The setting
of a property?
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 09:54, Aaron Sherman wrote:
A simple implementation of rand() and srand() which may not be ideal for
Perl. Also included is the test file for random ops. If anyone can think
of a good way to ALWAYS know that a number we got back was random,
throw that into the test
to write
waitfor Px # Wait for the request to finish
So, all Parrot IO will be asynchronous? Does that mean that there's no
way to perform an atomic read or write?
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me
On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 11:36, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 11:25 AM -0400 5/4/04, Aaron Sherman wrote:
So, all Parrot IO will be asynchronous? Does that mean that there's no
way to perform an atomic read or write?
Yes, and there isn't now anywhere anyway so it's not a big deal.
I was speaking
.
Let me know. I'm happy to do it either way, and I'll look at modifying
the other bit-string operators if they don't conform to the decision.
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
signature.asc
and Leo perform upon my patch ;-)
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
of this at the beginning of this thread.
You should not, at this point, be confused about the scope of what I
want to do, as it was very narrowly and clearly defined up-front.
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
this many brain cells on.
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
with any other encoding, you may
proceed to write your own damn code ;-)
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
with the extent to which Parrot embraces abstraction, but
inconsistency is not one of them.
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
the string.
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
of
doing at all, but I'm just bringing it up) might be WORSE than you would
think on P4 and beyond because of hyperthreading.
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
maintainers
in those languages anyway.
Oh, one more thing: I added op numbers for the sqrt ops since they were
causing me to be given some warnings during build. Feel free to ignore
them if you don't want sqrt to have op numbers.
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
language defined as:
foo: emit_parrot(foo, return, args)
but rand defined as:
rand: emit_parrot(set, return, Random)
It's just a potential point of confusion.
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me
around that performance hit for code that doesn't want to take
it?
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
, you might even provide this abstraction as yet another layer, if
it's really helpful. But most languages/system libraries that don't come
out of Microsoft expect a POSIX view of the world, so that's probably a
reasonable default.
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 12:33, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 12:21 PM -0400 4/28/04, Aaron Sherman wrote:
Since we're specifically talking about Perl here (and probably not Perl
5, since its overloading model is baroque and probably has to be managed
by the compiler, not Parrot)
Actually perl 5's
.
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
the biggie), it's
fine... just don't expect people to do anything with it except extract
the POSIX semantics... after all, it took 15 years to get to the point
that POSIX could unify file semantics as much as it did
Keeping a niche open for ACLs is probably smart, esp. in the Windows
world.
--
Aaron
knew that,
and there will have to be conventions to prevent it.
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
be OTHER_CD?
Yep. Cut'n'paste error. :(
I didn't even see that. Being dyslexic, my eye skips over that kind of
error very easily. I just see it as my own mistake ;-)
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down
abstract away the native system to the point that no
reasonable integration can occur between the language and its
surroundings (e.g. Java).
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
See attached patch which prevents the docs/Makefile from including
invalid targets that just happen to be editor temp files (emacs temp
files have a # character which really boggles make).
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 15:34, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 3:25 PM -0400 4/23/04, Aaron Sherman wrote:
That I did not know about, but noticed Dan pointing it out too. I'm
still learning a lot here,
It might be best, for everyone's peace of mind, blood pressure, and
general edification, to take
. If I have time, I'll chase it down.
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
Note: We've moved past hyper-ops (I hope!), but there are still some
details in this post that deserve a response on tangential topics.
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 11:52, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's unrealistic.
No. A real test.
Sorry, I was not clear
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 14:52, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What might be interesting is to compare Parrot to Parrot doing this with
and without a hyper-operator. That's all I was trying to say.
I'd posted that as well. Here again with an O3 build of parrot
exist, perhaps this is a good place for me to jump in
and get to know the code rather that just talking :)
rand/srand
sqrt
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
for a lot of reasons, but
I'll understand if we can't get that.
Thanks all!
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
would it be to interact with Parrot in the way that #1
proposes?
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 11:22, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 10:48 AM -0400 4/22/04, Aaron Sherman wrote:
More to the point, Perl 6's compiler will have to parse class Joe,
create a new object of type Class, parse and execute the following
block/closure in class MetaClass, assign the result
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 14:44, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 1:05 PM -0400 4/22/04, Aaron Sherman wrote:
This is in direct contradiction to what I'm hearing from you, Dan.
What's the scoop?
The scoop is that
my Joe $foo;
emits the code that, at runtime, finds the class ID of whatever Joe's
and
their hyper-equivalent, they can do it in a high level language
like P6 or as run-time loadable parrot opcodes (which PDL will
certainly have to do, since most of their ops are in an ancient
and gigantic Fortran lib).
Sounding like problem solved to me! Thanks Larry.
--
Aaron
, and obviously the Perl 6 compiler can
call out to parrot.
Clearly my question was garbled the first time, as this answer is
exactly what I was looking for. Thanks!
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down
On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 18:06, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This horse is getting a bit ripe, so I'm going to skip most of the
detail. I think we all agree on most of the basics, we just disagree on
what to do with them. That's cool.
I do want to pick a couple
what you expect, and
$foo + $bar
is special.
--
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
