Anything I'm missing? This is for *after* 0.0.11, of course. (And
potentially after a case of really good beer, soda, or dog food is shipped
off to Robert... :)
Of course, any of the above will help grease the wheels. You can
also paypal to my non-computer charity of choice...
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 09:22:05PM -0700, Steve Fink wrote:
Anything I'm missing?
I feel obliged to suggest putting HQ9PLUS into the languages directory.
:-)
dha
--
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
It must be difficult being such a visionary.
Not really. You
The only feedback I received was positive, so parrot-0.0.11.tar.gz is
on its way to CPAN right now. Sorry, no hq9+ interpreter included,
however. Any language that can print itself should be able to test
itself, but there's no 't' command to print ok 1. Such shoddy design
should not be encouraged.
At long last, Parrot-0.0.11 Doubloon has been released!
This release features direct generation of executable binaries,
dramatically improved documentation, and a built-in bread maker! Get
it while it's hot at
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/S/SF/SFINK/parrot-0.0.11.tar.gz, or
join the party by
Steve Fink writes:
- Dramatically accelerated sweeps for finalizable objects
Er, not yet. I was supposed to test the crap out of it, and then came
the feature freeze on top of a couple tests in my classes, um, the
school kind :-). I'll have it ready pretty soon.
Luke
On Sep-20, Luke Palmer wrote:
Steve Fink writes:
- Dramatically accelerated sweeps for finalizable objects
Er, not yet. I was supposed to test the crap out of it, and then came
the feature freeze on top of a couple tests in my classes, um, the
school kind :-). I'll have it ready pretty
Okay, I will probably find some time to hack tomorrow, in which case
I'll start in on The Great Renaming. (It's also *right* after a feature
freeze, so hopefully there won't be too many pending patches.) Here's
my plans:
* Internal struct Parrot_Interp will become struct parrot_interp_t
*
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 05:06:09PM +, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch
# Please include the string: [perl #23039]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=23039
RT says that
Jonathan Worthington wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you try Juergen Boemmels proposal RFT / patch?
I actually went through all the makefiles and put ${slash} in place of all
Would you mind to just read Juergen's mail and test his patch?
leo
Steve Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At long last, Parrot-0.0.11 Doubloon has been released!
I've updated the native tests and the release instructions.
Could you repeat step 8 please.
leo
On Sep-20, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Steve Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At long last, Parrot-0.0.11 Doubloon has been released!
I've updated the native tests and the release instructions.
Could you repeat step 8 please.
Damn.
Can't just do that, though, because PAUSE won't accept
On Sep-20, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 10:02:34AM -0700, Steve Fink wrote:
Can't just do that, though, because PAUSE won't accept submissions
with duplicate filenames.
So would people prefer 0.0.11.2 or 0.0.12? (0.0.12 would improve the
average spacing between
Oh, and if anyone wants to check out the newer-and-improveder
parrot-0.0.11, you can grab it at
http://foxglove.dnsalias.org/~sfink/uploads/parrot-0.0.11.tar.gz
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 10:02, Steve Fink wrote:
So would people prefer 0.0.11.2 or 0.0.12? (0.0.12 would improve the
average spacing between releases!)
Either way, an updated ChangeLog could be useful.
-- c
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 10:32:21AM +0200, Jos Visser wrote:
When I install and use an exception handler for the second time Parrot
dumps. It looks like the set_eh messes up the sub object in P10
because when I uncomment the second newsub it works...
Is this a behaviour of the hidden invoke
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 03:47:07PM +, mcharity @ vendian . org wrote:
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #23411]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=23411
All --
I don't understand how .globalconst fits in with the IMCC policy
of everything being in a .sub.
The Jako compiler emits stuff like this right now (in my sandbox).
It used to emit the constants as .const right where the were found
lexically, but I've introduced code motion to collect all
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 08:06:12PM +0100, Steve Purkis wrote:
On Saturday, September 20, 2003, at 06:11 pm, Steve Fink wrote:
On Sep-20, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 10:02:34AM -0700, Steve Fink wrote:
Can't just do that, though, because PAUSE won't accept submissions
Gregor N. Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All --
It used to emit the constants as .const right where the were found
lexically, but I've introduced code motion to collect all inline
code into the __MAIN sub at the end, which put the .const stuff
there (which I've changed to .globalconst in the
Tels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This begs the question(s):
I know what BASIC means, but what the hell is a PCM and what is a IMCC
supposed to mean? And what is a CPS? The FAQ doesn't cover this...
You mean PMC probably, anyway, these are not really frequently asked
they are already answered:
$
Nicholas Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a behaviour of the hidden invoke (of the exception handler) that
I am unaware of?
This got Warnocked, didn't it?
No, albeit I can't find my answers WRT that, it is fixed.
Nicholas Clark
leo
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 08:31:42PM +0200, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
GetCount
Fill
What should these calls do?
These look like they are for buffering layers.
For a long time the perl5 tried to cheat stdio by sneaking data directly
out of the stdio buffers. To do this, it was trying to keep
Leo --
I'm going to chuck the idea of collecting stuff, and use
this:
.sub _INLINE_{N}
# a chunk of stuff
goto _INLINE_{N+1}
.end
to wrap each contiguous piece. I don't want symbols defined
at point X in the code to be visible to subs introduced at
points prior to X.
I think the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
At long last, Parrot-0.0.11 Doubloon has been released!
This begs the question(s):
I know what BASIC means, but what the hell is a PCM and what is a IMCC
supposed to mean? And what is a CPS? The FAQ doesn't cover this...
Best wishes,
Teproud A
At 9:28 PM +0200 9/20/03, Tels wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
At long last, Parrot-0.0.11 Doubloon has been released!
This begs the question(s):
I know what BASIC means, but what the hell is a PCM and what is a IMCC
supposed to mean? And what is a CPS? The FAQ doesn't cover
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski) writes:
I know what BASIC means, but what the hell is a PCM and what is a IMCC
supposed to mean? And what is a CPS? The FAQ doesn't cover this...
PMC is Pulse Code Modulation
That's PCM. PMC is Phillip Martin Cozens, my father.
--
Will your long-winded
On Sep-19, Brent Dax wrote:
Steve Fink:
# Following things were done:
# - s,/,\${slash},g
#
# Ugh. How difficult would it be to have Configure do this rewriting
# automatically? (Or rewrite to whatever it is you need, instead)? This
# just clutters up the makefiles a little too much,
On Sep-15, Dan Sugalski wrote:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Steve Fink wrote:
But that's really just shifting the burden to the receiving end, which
will now have to filter P5..P(5+L1-1), P3[0..] into the appropriate
local variables. So what would be even easier, and probably just as
fast,
On Sep-20, Steve Fink wrote:
At long last, Parrot-0.0.11 Doubloon has been released!
And so has Parrot-0.0.11.1, for those of you who want correct native
bytecode tests!
http://cpan.perl.org/authors/id/S/SF/SFINK/parrot-0.0.11.1.tar.gz
Hmm... for symmetry, I'm now thinking I ought to have
At 5:35 PM -0700 9/20/03, Steve Fink wrote:
On Sep-20, Steve Fink wrote:
At long last, Parrot-0.0.11 Doubloon has been released!
And so has Parrot-0.0.11.1, for those of you who want correct native
bytecode tests!
http://cpan.perl.org/authors/id/S/SF/SFINK/parrot-0.0.11.1.tar.gz
Hmm... for
Steve Fink writes:
The callee side would then need to have a way of saying ...and all
the rest. So that would be
.params PythonArray foo
Or, perhaps we could have an ArgArray PMC, which, upon construction,
would examine the registers as per the calling conventions, and stick
all the
Luke --
Need it *actually* stick them in the array? Or, could it
just provide an array-like interface to the underlying
registers? Thats cheaper, especially if not all args are
going to get accessed.
Explaining how such a thing works to an optimizer that
wants to know when registers are being
Gregor N. Purdy writes:
Need it *actually* stick them in the array? Or, could it
just provide an array-like interface to the underlying
registers? Thats cheaper, especially if not all args are
going to get accessed.
I don't think so. What if you wanted to make a closure over the array?
Then
33 matches
Mail list logo
