dakkar wrote:
Say I have:
multi sub foo(Array $a,Int $b) {...}
multi sub foo(Hash %a, Int $b) {...}
and I want to (distinctly) wrap each multisub, say for testing, or AOP,
or whatever. How do I get the two different code references? As far as i
can gather from the Apocalipses and Synopses, the
On May 26, 2005, at 10:03 AM, Piers Cawley wrote:
Stevan Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
... The way I
see it working is that the language itself has a bunch of minimal
hooks that
get triggered by various phases of compilation etc. Your editor then
becomes
something that instruments the c
With a meta model for code signatures you could generate a code
signature and then ask it to locate any matching multis.
For a more concrete handle on how this might look if I were king-
wait a while... ;-)
When I have more time to finalize docs/mmd.kwid and then describe
the meta model for func
Say I have:
multi sub foo(Array $a,Int $b) {...}
multi sub foo(Hash %a, Int $b) {...}
and I want to (distinctly) wrap each multisub, say for testing, or AOP,
or whatever. How do I get the two different code references? As far as i
can gather from the Apocalipses and Synopses, there should be a
Austin Hastings wrote:
--- James Mastros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Millsa Erlas wrote:
I have thought of an interesting idea that may allow Perl 6 to make
the
$, @, and % optional on many uses of variables. This involves
simply
extending the function namespace to include all kinds
In Perl5, if I do:
sub foo {return 1}
sub foo {return 2}
print foo();
I get a redefinition error, and a '2' on STDOUT. Can I assume this will
be the same in Perl6? i.e. can I write a test for pugs to check this?
Moreover:
sub foo(Num $a) {return 1}
sub foo(Str $a) {return 2}
print foo(1),
On 6/3/05, Millsa Erlas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does this allow the grammer rules of the language to be changed so that
> this could be implemented? How does this work?
Yes. In fact, one of the big goals of perl 6 is to allow people to
mutate the grammar of the language.
If you just want sc
--- James Mastros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Millsa Erlas wrote:
> > I have thought of an interesting idea that may allow Perl 6 to make
> the
> > $, @, and % optional on many uses of variables. This involves
> simply
> > extending the function namespace to include all kinds of
> structures, a
James Mastros wrote:
Millsa Erlas wrote:
I have thought of an interesting idea that may allow Perl 6 to make the
$, @, and % optional on many uses of variables. This involves simply
extending the function namespace to include all kinds of structures, and
thus the function namespace does not req
Millsa Erlas wrote:
> I have thought of an interesting idea that may allow Perl 6 to make the
> $, @, and % optional on many uses of variables. This involves simply
> extending the function namespace to include all kinds of structures, and
> thus the function namespace does not require symbols, the
> localtime() and gmtime() seem fairly core to me. The array contexts are
> simple, and the scalar context is an RFC valid string. Nothing too heavy
> there. The time() function is "typically" only moderately useful without
> localtime().
This is true if the time() function returns a simple sca
Nigel Sandever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks, applied - r8263
> Further thoughts on the questions in comments invited.
Yeah.
> njs
leo
Apologies for the wrong list. Should I resend to the correct one?
njs
Hi,
I'm working on a web templating system, and I'm wondering how should I use
rules?
I have these defs:
rule elem {
\< wts \: (<[a..z]>+) \/ \>
}
rule block {
\< wts \: (<[a..z]>+)\>(.*?)\< \/ wts \: $1 \>
}
I would like to execute subroutines during the evaluation. What sh
Further thoughts on the questions in comments invited.
njs
win32-exec.c.patch
Description: Binary data
I have thought of an interesting idea that may allow Perl 6 to make the
$, @, and % optional on many uses of variables. This involves simply
extending the function namespace to include all kinds of structures, and
thus the function namespace does not require symbols, they are optional.
The int
On 6/3/05, Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I would like to be able to do is:
>
> my $str = 'hello';
> my @chars = $str.chars; #
I can't see this being a problem at all. For starters, the whole "what
is a character" issue is just as relevant to +($foo.chars) as it is to
list($foo
17 matches
Mail list logo
