On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 04:35:42PM -0600, David Green wrote:
> On 2009-Aug-9, at 3:57 pm, Tim Bunce wrote:
>> Perhaps it's worth asking what we might call the release after that
>> one.
>> "Rakudo not-quite-so-lite"?
>
> Rakudo ** (aka "Rakudo Exponentiation")? Though I think Patrick is
> opti
On 2009-Aug-9, at 6:30 am, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Its just that */star/whatever doesnt convey [to me] the fact that
its a sub-set of of Perl6.
I like "*"... it has more personality than "lite". (Or even "light".)
Though since it's a subset, we could always call it "Rakudo ⊂"!
On 2009-
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 10:57:16PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
> > > Since Rakudo* (not sure how it is to be written) is intended to be a
> > > cut-down version of perl6.0.0 that is useable, how about Rakudo-lite?
> >
> > Hmmm, that's a very reasonable name. Over the past few days I've
> > become a
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 10:19:44AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 04:30:07PM +0400, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> > Referring to Patrick's blog about an official 'useable' version of
> > Rakudo, a suggestion:
> >
> > Since Rakudo* (not sure how it is to be written) is in
Ruby anyone? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rake_(software).
Henry
On August 9, 2009 11:44:24 am Austin Hastings wrote:
> How about "Rake"?
>
> =Austin
>
> Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> > Referring to Patrick's blog about an official 'useable' version of
> > Rakudo, a suggestion:
> >
> > Since R
How about "Rake"?
=Austin
Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Referring to Patrick's blog about an official 'useable' version of
Rakudo, a suggestion:
Since Rakudo* (not sure how it is to be written) is intended to be a
cut-down version of perl6.0.0 that is useable, how about Rakudo-lite?
Its just
Rakudo Light
Rakudo Star Light
Rakudo Rock Star
Rakudo Hard Rock
Rakudo Play Hard
Rakudo Play
Just musing...
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 04:30:07PM +0400, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> Referring to Patrick's blog about an official 'useable' version of
> Rakudo, a suggestion:
>
> Since Rakudo* (not sure how it is to be written) is intended to be a
> cut-down version of perl6.0.0 that is useable, how about Ra
Referring to Patrick's blog about an official 'useable' version of
Rakudo, a suggestion:
Since Rakudo* (not sure how it is to be written) is intended to be a
cut-down version of perl6.0.0 that is useable, how about Rakudo-lite?
Its just that */star/whatever doesnt convey [to me] the fact that
