Author: lwall
Date: 2009-12-18 05:28:09 +0100 (Fri, 18 Dec 2009)
New Revision: 29366
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S12-objects.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Basics.pod
Log:
[S03] rename prefix: to prefix: to avoid having to explain the
valence diffe
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-12-18 05:05:15 +0100 (Fri, 18 Dec 2009)
New Revision: 29365
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S29-functions.pod
Log:
[S04] rename break/nobreak to succeed/proceed
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-12-18 03:57:14 +0100 (Fri, 18 Dec 2009)
New Revision: 29364
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[S32/Containers] change mutating .pick to be separate .grab method
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
==
Todd Olson wrote:
At 14:54 -0500 2009-12-17, Jon Lang wrote:
And really, my whole point is that the implementation details are
(conceptually) the only thing that distinguishes Complex::Polar from
Complex::Cartesian.
All though both e^(i ¼) and e^(i 3 ¼) evaluate to -1 + 0i
it is often u
Doug McNutt wrote:
my ($x, $y) = $vector «·« ( [1, 0], [0, 1] );
After a while I became resigned to the fact that dot and cross
products were not what was being offered. Instead a product of two
vectors was to be simply a component by component multiply that
produced another "vector" of the s
At 11:54 -0800 12/17/09, Jon Lang wrote:
>> And I think there's a Math error in the 4th line: you don't need the
>> components of a vector to do a dot product with that vector -- so it is just
>>
>> my ($x, $y) = $vector «·« ( [1, 0], [0, 1] );
>
>True enough.
>
>> Which makes me wonder if all of
At 14:54 -0500 2009-12-17, Jon Lang wrote:
>Dave Whipp wrote:
>And really, my whole point is that the implementation details are
>(conceptually) the only thing that distinguishes Complex::Polar from
>Complex::Cartesian.
All though both e^(i ¼) and e^(i 3 ¼) evaluate to -1 + 0i
it is often us
Dave Whipp wrote:
> Jon Lang wrote:
>>
>> my ($num, $denom) = $num.^attr; # $num.WHAT == Ratio;
>> my ($mag, $phase) = Complex::Polar($z).^attr;
>> my ($re, $im) = Complex::Cartesian($z).^attr;
>> my ($x, $y) = $vector.^attr »·« ( [1, 0], [0, 1] );
>
> If I'm reading this right, the .^attr is e
Jon Lang wrote:
my ($num, $denom) = $num.^attr; # $num.WHAT == Ratio;
my ($mag, $phase) = Complex::Polar($z).^attr;
my ($re, $im) = Complex::Cartesian($z).^attr;
my ($x, $y) = $vector.^attr »·« ( [1, 0], [0, 1] );
If I'm reading this right, the .^attr is exposing implementation details
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-12-17 18:18:31 +0100 (Thu, 17 Dec 2009)
New Revision: 29357
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
Log:
[S04] 'continue' confuses both C and Perl programmers, so rename to 'nobreak'
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
=
Dave Whipp wrote:
> Moritz Lenz wrote:
>>
>> Dave Whipp wrote:
>>>
>>> [cut] Contrast with Rat which has both separate accessors and the "nude"
>>> method (a name that could possibly be improved to avoid adult-content
>>> filters)
>>
>> suggestions welcome.
>
> Attempting to generalize: what we wan
Moritz Lenz wrote:
Dave Whipp wrote:
[cut] Contrast with Rat which has both separate accessors and the
"nude" method (a name that could possibly be improved to avoid
adult-content filters)
suggestions welcome.
Attempting to generalize: what we want is an operator that extracts a
Seq of val
At 19:46 -0500 2009-12-16, Dave Whipp wrote:
yary wrote:
At 00:15 +0100 12/17/09, Moritz Lenz wrote:
Not quite, .abs returns one of the polar coordinates (the magnitude), so
only a method is missing that returns the angle.
Any ideas for a good name?
Would a method called "phi" with a un
At 17:10 -0500 2009-12-16, Dave Whipp wrote:
>define the return value more formally, something like:
>
> our multi method polar (Complex $nim: --> [ Real $mag where 0..Inf,
>Real $angle where -¼ ..^ ¼ ]) is export { ... }
>
In complex analysis it is often legitimate to work with numbers
where th
Author: masak
Date: 2009-12-17 11:46:33 +0100 (Thu, 17 Dec 2009)
New Revision: 29353
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S09-data.pod
Log:
fixed one typo and one ws inconsistency
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
==
Author: masak
Date: 2009-12-17 11:45:37 +0100 (Thu, 17 Dec 2009)
New Revision: 29352
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Basics.pod
Log:
kill off REJECTS
It was generally agreed on #perl6 that the REJECTS method doesn't add
anything to the functio
Larry , through S-ro commitbot:
> +Since a C, unlike a C, is mutable, C<.pick> works
> +directly on the C, modifying it in place. You must copy
> +the C first if you don't want it modified in place.
This violates Least Surprise for me. An Array is also mutable, but it
doesn't get modified in plac
17 matches
Mail list logo
