On 10/13/2015 03:17 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>... We have 390+ modules, and hand-waving away all
> trouble of maintaining them seems a bit lofty.
> ... a large percentage of the module updates are done by group of
> maybe five to a dozen volunteers. ... 5 people updating 70% of 390
> modules. Modules
On 2015-10-15 5:27 AM, yary wrote:
Short answer: everything must declare which semantics it expects-
everything in Panda/CPAN at least. And we already knew it, just need
to do it.
I believe this is something Perl 6 should require in general, if it doesn't.
That is, it should be MANDATORY for P
Moritz rant away! Actually, I think this it is a very significant
milestone in the development of a language and its ecosystem when
backwards compatibility becomes an issue.
There will always be modules that have bit rot, insufficient
documentation, inadequate testing, no reviews, etc. The pro
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/perl6/specs
Commit: 9742c3981abe688164cf9d4a4c8c88d053b99368
https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/9742c3981abe688164cf9d4a4c8c88d053b99368
Author: Stéphane Payrard
Date: 2015-10-15 (Thu, 15 Oct 2015)
Changed paths:
M S
Short answer: everything must declare which semantics it expects-
everything in Panda/CPAN at least. And we already knew it, just need
to do it.
Full post: This thread points to a bigger problem, which has a
solution that is both cultural and technical.
Perl5 has a colossal code corpus, humbling
On 10/15/2015 10:47 AM, Smylers wrote:
Moritz Lenz writes:
On 10/13/2015 10:52 AM, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Following on the :D not :D thread, something odd stuck out.
On 10/13/2015 03:17 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
We have 390+ modules, and hand-waving away all trouble of
maintaining them s
> On 15 Oct 2015, at 12:57, Mark Overmeer wrote:
>
> * Elizabeth Mattijsen (l...@dijkmat.nl) [151015 10:43]:
>> FWIW, I’m with FROGGS on this.
>> use variables :D;
>
> In the first response to this message, Moritz spoke about
> use invocant :D;
> and use parameters :D;
>
> Three different
* Elizabeth Mattijsen (l...@dijkmat.nl) [151015 10:43]:
> FWIW, I’m with FROGGS on this.
> use variables :D;
In the first response to this message, Moritz spoke about
use invocant :D;
and use parameters :D;
Three different things?
> at the top of the scope of your code, and then you’re s
> On 15 Oct 2015, at 11:06, Tobias Leich wrote:
> Am 15.10.2015 um 10:47 schrieb Smylers:
>> Moritz Lenz writes:
>>
>>> On 10/13/2015 10:52 AM, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
>>>
Following on the :D not :D thread, something odd stuck out.
On 10/13/2015 03:17 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>>
Am 15.10.2015 um 10:47 schrieb Smylers:
> Moritz Lenz writes:
>
>> On 10/13/2015 10:52 AM, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
>>
>>> Following on the :D not :D thread, something odd stuck out.
>>>
>>> On 10/13/2015 03:17 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
We have 390+ modules, and hand-waving away all trouble of
Moritz Lenz writes:
> On 10/13/2015 10:52 AM, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
>
> > Following on the :D not :D thread, something odd stuck out.
> >
> > On 10/13/2015 03:17 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> > >
> > > We have 390+ modules, and hand-waving away all trouble of
> > > maintaining them seems a bit lo
11 matches
Mail list logo
