* Elizabeth Mattijsen (l...@dijkmat.nl) [151015 10:43]:
> FWIW, I’m with FROGGS on this.
> use variables :D;
In the first response to this message, Moritz spoke about
use invocant :D;
and use parameters :D;
Three different things?
> at the top of the scope of your code, and then you’re set. I admit
> it feels a *little* like the “use strict” boilerplate of Perl 5.
It is.
> On the other hand, I think by just specifying a type *without* smiley,
> is already so much better than the situation in Perl 5 that the lacking
> strictness of :D will not be needed much to catch programming / garbage
> in type of errors anyway.
Much better, of course. Programming languages are used by people
of different taste. Some may find "much better" enough, other people
want more.
--
Regards,
MarkOv
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Overmeer MSc MARKOV Solutions
m...@overmeer.net soluti...@overmeer.net
http://Mark.Overmeer.net http://solutions.overmeer.net
