--- Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, that's true. But note that you can't do that black magic you
were
speaking of earlier:
$a [ (cond ?? infix:+ : infix:*) but tighter(infix:*) ] $b
Because we can't choose the precedence of an operator after we parse
it... unless we're
Austin Hastings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Eirik wrote:]
Let us see ... somewhat speculative and probably short-of-the-mark
generalization coming up:
macro infix:[ ($lhs, $op, $rhs)
is parsed(/(Perl6.expr) \] (Perl6.expr)/) {
return {
$op($lhs, $rhs)
};
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luke Palmer) writes:
[$lhs, $rhs]æ\220\215.æ\235\237compile;
What's that in old money?
--
As the saying goes, if you give a man a fish, he eats for a day. If you
teach him to grep for fish, he'll leave you alone all weekend. If you
encourage him to beg for fish, pretty soon
Simon Cozens writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luke Palmer) writes:
[$lhs, $rhs]\220\215.\235\237compile;
What's that in old money?
Eep. I thought I had mutt's utf-8 working, but apparently not.
Does anyone who knows about these things want to mail me instructions,
or something? That'd be nice
Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Cool stuff. In my usual pedantic sort of way, I'll go through the
message and fix everything you said. For educational purposes only, of
course :-)
Thanks :-)
For further education, some more questions/comments, if I may:
# Let's say Cis
Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmm, since we're requiring no whitespace between a variable and it's
subscript, this should be possible:
if Dough [eqn 4] Douglas {...}
Lisp! :-)
Well, almost. Now this would be lisp-y:
if $test [$moon.is_waxing ? infix: : infix:=] $target
-Original Message-
From: Eirik Berg Hanssen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 11:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pondering parameterized operators
Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmm, since we're requiring no whitespace between
Cool stuff. In my usual pedantic sort of way, I'll go through the
message and fix everything you said. For educational purposes only, of
course :-)
Eirik Berg Hanssen writes:
Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmm, since we're requiring no whitespace between a variable and it's
So I sit here and think for a minute about how nice it will be in P6 to
be able to define
operator infix:eqi($str1, $str2) {...}
for doing
if ($1 eqi last)
and I think about the whole 'C' string library. Which dredges up my old
questions about parameterized operators:
How can I
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Austin Hastings wrote:
How can I conveniently pass an extra parameter to a historically binary
operator?
If it's one of the 'base' binary operators (addition, subtraction, and
whatnot) you don't.
Dan
Austin Hastings writes:
How can I conveniently pass an extra parameter to a historically binary
operator?
I see a few possibilities. The first, call it like a function:
if infix:eqn(Dough, Douglas, n = 4) {...}
Or, you could use the adverbial modifier Cwhere (well, not officially
yet,
Austin Hastings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
if (Dough eqn(4) Douglas) ...
I wonder if the . operator is available here:
if Dough eq.n(4) Douglas { ... }
that makes it intuitive how to define new equality methods. One thing of
concern is that we'd need whitespace rules to disambiguate things. I
12 matches
Mail list logo
