duh. I'll learn to finish reading all the posts before adding my own
*someday*.
--- Darren Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:23 AM +0300 12/11/07, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Darren Duncan wrote:
At 9:04 AM +0300 12/10/07, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Equally, Something to replace CGI or DBI
It also helps that you consistently make incisive observations and
contributions to conversations, even if they are a little tart
sometimes. :)
But on this general note, is there any current organization or location
where small problems are being parcelled out? I'd love to help, but my
time is
Paul Hodges wrote:
But on this general note, is there any current organization or location
where small problems are being parcelled out? I'd love to help, but my
time is as limited as everyone's If I could get small bites of work
to do, maybe I could contribute something useful.
Anyone
Why thank you Mr. Chromatic!
In between all my other activities, I have been trolling along this list
from its inception, and followed eagerly every Appocalpse, Exegisis and
Synopsis as soon as they came on line. I download pugs and parrot from
SVN repositories, written tests - one of which
At 9:04 AM +0300 12/10/07, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Equally, Something to replace CGI or DBI will be essential to the
uptake of P6. I would far prefer to have a skilled and resourceful
professional, such as yourself or Damian Conway write these modules
than leave it to enthusiastic amateurs
On Sunday 09 December 2007 22:04:30 Richard Hainsworth wrote:
I download pugs and parrot from
SVN repositories, written tests - one of which still hangs the
compilation of pugs. Indeed the test I wrote for pugs concerned the
ability of pugs to use existing CPAN modules. I have tried parrot
On Saturday 08 December 2007 06:50:48 Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Surely, some concentrated thought by the inventive and resouceful minds of
who lead this project should go into language utilisation and
popularisation.
My goodness, @Larry's pretty darn busy trying to build the core kernel of
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 07:43:25PM -0800, Peter Scott wrote:
: I do feel strongly that we need some sort of solution to this so that Perl
: 6 is not merely an outstanding framework that leaves all domain-specific
: extensions to the end user.
Perl 6 as a language doesn't address this (except to
Larry Wall wrote:
Now, it might well be that a Perl standards body could specify a
mininum suggested set of modules for any distribution to enhance
interoperability, but we haven't got to that point yet, I don't think.
This would be great though!!
Even if it is afterward, it is still a lot
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 03:57:58 -0700, David Green wrote:
Part of a solution is search.cpan.org -- if you can figure out which
of the 870 XML modules will be useful to you. Another part is asking
on newsgroups or lists -- if you can figure out which of the 870
opinions offered is
Peter Scott writes:
I do feel strongly that we need some sort of solution to this so that
Perl 6 is not merely an outstanding framework that leaves all
domain-specific extensions to the end user.
OK.
Can we find a way to make and maintain some recommendations in a way
that people can find
On Nov 30, 2007 10:57 AM, David Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe some kind of Advisory Board would help, where people (who
might be experts in various ways) can offer informed recommendations
on what modules make a good fit for what circumstances. Ultimately,
if this is something we want,
12 matches
Mail list logo
