Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
>Juerd wrote:
>
>
>>Ingo Blechschmidt skribis 2005-10-10 20:08 (+0200):
>>
>>
>>>Named arguments can -- under the proposal -- only ever exist in
>>>calls.
>>>
>>>
>>Which leaves us with no basic datastructure that can hold both
>>positional and named arguments.
On 11/10/05, Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luke's Tuple proposal, aka Luke's Grand Unified Object Model, is way not
> what we need for this. As far as I can see, LGUOM is an expression of
> "Haskell envy" of brobdingnagian proportion.
The reason I refrained from linking to theory.po
Hi,
Stuart Cook wrote:
> On 11/10/05, Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> A rule that says
>> "splatting
>> a list coerces all pairs into named args" works just fine. The
>> corresponding rule, "acc
HaloO,
Larry Wall wrote:
It still has to figure out how to reconcile the named arguments
with the positional parameters, of course, unless someone has
made sufficient representation to the compiler that all calls to
a particular short name have particular named parameters that are
guaranteed to
Feather has been online for a few months now, and I think it's a good
idea to try to evaluate, and to see how it can further improve
productivity.
The machine has 49 user accounts and is used in several ways. It is
mostly used to connect to IRC. Pugs and parrot are compiled and
developed a lot on
Hello all.
I would like to propose that class methods do not get inherited along
normal class lines.
I think that inheriting class methods will, in many cases, not DWIM.
This is largely because your are inheriting behavior, and not state
(since class attributes are not inheritable). Let m
Anyway, I have said my peace, what do you all think?
I think there are serious problems with this proposal. For a start, it would
be very difficult to create *any* objects at all if the C class method
wasn't inheritable.
Damian
Stevan Little wrote:
I would like to propose that class methods do not get inherited along
normal class lines.
One of the things that has annoyed me with Java is that it's class
methods don't inherit (dispatch polymorphically). This means that you
can't apply the "template method" pattern to
Damian,
On Oct 11, 2005, at 6:53 PM, Damian Conway wrote:
Anyway, I have said my peace, what do you all think?
I think there are serious problems with this proposal. For a start,
it would be very difficult to create *any* objects at all if the
C class method wasn't inheritable.
Actually
David,
On Oct 11, 2005, at 7:49 PM, Dave Whipp wrote:
Stevan Little wrote:
I would like to propose that class methods do not get inherited
along normal class lines.
One of the things that has annoyed me with Java is that it's class
methods don't inherit (dispatch polymorphically). This m
Stevan Little wrote:
David,
...
If you would please give a real-world-useful example of this usage of
class-methods, I am sure I could show you, what I believe, is a better
approach that does not use class methods.
...
The example I've wanted to code in Java is along the lines of:
public
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 06:10:41PM -0400, Stevan Little wrote:
: Hello all.
:
: I would like to propose that class methods do not get inherited along
: normal class lines.
I think most class methods should be written as submethods instead.
: I think that inheriting class methods will, in many
David,
On Oct 11, 2005, at 8:42 PM, Dave Whipp wrote:
Stevan Little wrote:
David,
...
If you would please give a real-world-useful example of this usage
of class-methods, I am sure I could show you, what I believe, is
a better approach that does not use class methods.
...
The exam
Hi (),
This is probably a stupid question, but I can't find anything from
google:
Does Perl6 support multiline comments?
Alfie John
On 10/11/05, Alfie John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does Perl6 support multiline comments?
Yes, in the form of pod blocks.
=begin comment
=end comment
They nest, too.
Luke
On 12/10/2005, at 3:33 PM, Luke Palmer wrote:
On 10/11/05, Alfie John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does Perl6 support multiline comments?
Yes, in the form of pod blocks.
=begin comment
=end comment
They nest, too.
Luke
But does that then break my lovely formatted pod like it does in Pe
Alfie John wrote:
Hi (),
This is probably a stupid question, but I can't find anything from google:
Does Perl6 support multiline comments?
Briefly, No and kind of.
Standard Perl 6 comments are just like those in Perl 5. A '#' starts a
comment that is terminated by the end of line. But, bo
On 12/10/2005, at 4:18 PM, Mark A. Biggar wrote:
Alfie John wrote:
Hi (),
This is probably a stupid question, but I can't find anything
from google:
Does Perl6 support multiline comments?
Briefly, No and kind of.
Standard Perl 6 comments are just like those in Perl 5. A '#'
starts
On 10/12/05, Alfie John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/10/2005, at 3:33 PM, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > =begin comment
> > =end comment
>
> But does that then break my lovely formatted pod like it does in Perl5?
Try this:
% cat > dosomething.pl
=head1 TITLE
Thingy - do something
=head1 DESCRIPTI
19 matches
Mail list logo
