Juerd wrote:
I do not see why $ and @ couldn't be both a sigil and an infix
operator, and the same goes for whatever ASCII equivalent ¢ gets.
^ and | are available for sigil use. (All the closing brackets are too,
but that would be very confusing because we tend to visually parse those
in
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 09:42:00AM +0100, Carl Franks wrote:
Where did you get ALT-155 from?
Code page 437:
http://www.kostis.net/charsets/cp437.htm
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 06:07:47AM -0500, Steve Peters wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 09:42:00AM +0100, Carl Franks wrote:
Where did you get
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And for anyone who says upgrade, please note that many firms in the real
world are still forcing a base perl version of 5.005_03 or 5.6.1 for
development. Still.
My weekend project is to demonstrate that you are an optimist.
At the risk of re-enforcing my apparent optimism.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 04:02:10PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
that the next best one to exploit is ¤ (euro;
unicode=20AC; utf8=E282AC), and the next best is
Woah. You've just demonstrated why Euro is far worse than any of the other
Unicode
Kaoru Maeda writes:
Darren Duncan wrote:
the next best is £
Isn't that 0x23 in UK? I imagine that someday all the comment lines
cause syntax errors in UK...
U+00A3 POUND SIGN is at 0x23 in ISO 646-GB (aka BS 4730), true.
Fortunately, that character set is almost never used. I think the
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 09:35:12AM -0400, Rob Kinyon wrote:
On 10/21/05, Steve Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 02:37:09PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
Steve Peters skribis 2005-10-21 6:07 (-0500):
Older versions of Eclipse are not able to enter these characters.
At 3:26 PM +0100 10/22/05, Nicholas Clark wrote:
At the risk of re-enforcing my apparent optimism.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 04:02:10PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
that the next best one to exploit is ¤ (euro;
unicode=20AC; utf8=E282AC), and the next best is
Woah. You've just demonstrated
