Re: perl6 compiler

2010-03-20 Thread Richard Hainsworth
I too re-read PM's journal. Note his explicit desire to avoid 'stability' as a goal at this stage for rakudo because of its imprecision. We often use words that have different shades of meanings for different people/situations, eg., what is a 'short' time? Consider how a child might answer,

Stability domains in rakudo *

2010-03-20 Thread Richard Hainsworth
I know PM does not like the word 'stability' for language development, and I have just posted a response to Wendell Hatcher's question justifying Patrick's approach. However, some other questions arose when I was considering 'usability', which Patrick sets as a goal for Rakudo *, as opposed

[Fwd: Re: Where's the release announcement?]

2010-03-20 Thread Richard Hainsworth
Re-posting to list. Original Message Subject:Re: Where's the release announcement? Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:39:17 +0300 From: Richard Hainsworth rich...@rusrating.ru To: Darren Duncan dar...@darrenduncan.net References: 4ba329a0.7030...@rusrating.ru

Versioned Dependencies (Was: Re: Stability domains in rakudo *)

2010-03-20 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Em Sáb, 2010-03-20 às 12:16 +0300, Richard Hainsworth escreveu: Suppose we define a domain of stability as syntax/functionality/features that will not be changed until a milestone is reached, with the guarantee that if the language specification changes before then, backwards compatibility

Re: [Fwd: Re: Where's the release announcement?]

2010-03-20 Thread Nuno 'smash' Carvalho
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Richard Hainsworth rich...@rusrating.ru wrote: Re-posting to list. Original Message Subject:        Re: Where's the release announcement? Date:   Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:39:17 +0300 From:   Richard Hainsworth rich...@rusrating.ru To:     Darren

Re: Versioned Dependencies (Was: Re: Stability domains in rakudo *)

2010-03-20 Thread Darren Duncan
Daniel Ruoso wrote: Em Sáb, 2010-03-20 às 12:16 +0300, Richard Hainsworth escreveu: Suppose we define a domain of stability as syntax/functionality/features that will not be changed until a milestone is reached, with the guarantee that if the language specification changes before then,

Re: Versioned Dependencies (Was: Re: Stability domains in rakudo *)

2010-03-20 Thread Richard Hainsworth
Not really a versioned dependencies. When a working module is updated to have new functionality, the old version continues to work. Here it is the very language that is changing. For instance, =$fh was used to generate input from a file. Now it is $fh.lines Old examples that I wrote using

Re: perl6 compiler

2010-03-20 Thread Wendell Hatcher
I actsully read the fact sheets in the past and want to confirm that a stable production qaulity release of perl6 is coming out this April or at the berry least the summer? Sent from my iPhone Wendell Hatcher wendell_hatc...@comcast.net 303-520-7554 Blogsite:

Re: Versioned Dependencies (Was: Re: Stability domains in rakudo *)

2010-03-20 Thread chromatic
On Saturday 20 March 2010 at 12:23, Richard Hainsworth wrote: In other words, I am suggesting a sort of mapping of the syntax of perl6 so that stable areas can us be used, perhaps avoiding instruments that are not yet explicitly stable. That assumes it's possible to know with sufficient

Re: perl6 compiler

2010-03-20 Thread Wendell Hatcher
Thanks Matt, I really like perl 6 and moose for that matter. :-) I feel that these implementations of truly take it into the application programmming arena. And, am hoping perl is thought of when building larger enterprise applications in the future once there is a true

Re: Versioned Dependencies (Was: Re: Stability domains in rakudo *)

2010-03-20 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Em Sáb, 2010-03-20 às 22:23 +0300, Richard Hainsworth escreveu: Here it is the very language that is changing. For instance, =$fh was used to generate input from a file. Now it is $fh.lines Note that I did mention versioned dependencies for grammar, CORE and setting. So yes, considering the