On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 03:22, Larry Wall wrote:
> [...] RFC 74 proposes the same thing. But I classified it under
> Apocalypse 11, Modules, which we skipped over to get to Objects
> first. So it hasn't actually been discussed much.
[...]
> most exportation will be done simply by marking the routine
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 09:31, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> And in it Apocalypse #26 was mentioned. Above, Larry mentions #11. At
> first the rate of 1 apolcalypse per month seemed to support the idea
> that Perl 6 would be defined within the next couple of years. However,
> trending shows that this funct
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron Sherman) writes:
> At the current rate, the aforementioned apoc #11 will be out sometime
> after I die, a frustrated old man who remembers the glory days of Perl
> 3.
The current rate is not going to be sustained; the Perl 6 class sytem
is a massive thing, and once that's
chromatic wrote:
With Apocalypse 12 (soon!)
I'm sorry but this just begs for the question: (vaguely) how soon? :)
I get all excited whenever I hear "Perl" and "six" in the same sentence,
and it's building up to be unbearable ;)
--
Robin Berjon
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 20040222
Welcome to the latest belated Perl 6 Summary. I'm running late, so we'll
just dive straight into perl6-internals
Loading bytecode at runtime
Last week Dan had specced out the rules for runtime loading of bytecode.
This week, Leo Töt
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 12:57, Simon Cozens wrote:
> > 1. Larry gets help in writing these (various degrees of delegation).
>
> I think we've been through this idea, no?
I dropped off the face of the earth for a bit... sorry if I am
re-hashing something old I did not see anything in the archives,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 12:31:04PM -0500, Aaron Sherman wrote:
: I cringe at what I'm about to ask because I know it's pushy, but thus is
: the burden of my impatience and hubris...
:
: There was a document:
:
: TITLE
: Apocalypse 1: The Ugly, the Bad, and the Good
:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 07:30:05PM +0100, Robin Berjon wrote:
: chromatic wrote:
: >With Apocalypse 12 (soon!)
:
: I'm sorry but this just begs for the question: (vaguely) how soon? :)
Well, here's the rough outline. I still have to do some writing on
multiple dispatch, overloading, and delegati
chromatic> With Apocalypse 12 (soon!)
RobinBerjon> how soon? :)
LarryWall> here's the rough outline
[indicating that it's pretty soon indeed]
Cool! But now I'm a little confused - what happened to Apocalypses 8
through 11? :)
-Mark
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 14:26, Larry Wall wrote:
> ch26/011.cf Examples encoded with =also for|begin|end POD commands
> ch26/044 Bring Documentation Closer To Whatever It Documents
> ch26/065 Add change bar functionality to pod
> ch26/079 The Predefined POD Streams are C, C, and C
>
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 02:50:50PM -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote:
: chromatic> With Apocalypse 12 (soon!)
: RobinBerjon> how soon? :)
: LarryWall> here's the rough outline
:
: [indicating that it's pretty soon indeed]
:
: Cool! But now I'm a little confused - what happened to Apocalypses 8
: throug
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 11:50, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> Cool! But now I'm a little confused - what happened to Apocalypses 8
> through 11? :)
They were:
- 8, References
- 9, Data Structures
- 10, Packages
- 11, Modules
Since 12, Objects is more important (and cover
2004-02-26T14:26:47 Larry Wall:
> Well now, I remember Perl 0, sonny.
Does that still exist anywhere? I don't have anything older than
perl 1.
> They don't make 'em like they used to...
That they don't. On Bent Linux (my own distro, based on uClibc
instead of glibc) I get
; ls -l perl1 perl5.8.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Wall) writes:
> It's the coherence that I can't delegate, and if I tried to, we would
> certainly end up with Second System Syndrome Done Wrong, instead of Done
> Right.
You know, it's statements like this that make it hard for even me to
be curmudgeonly.
> E7 is com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bennett Todd) writes:
> 2004-02-26T14:26:47 Larry Wall:
> > Well now, I remember Perl 0, sonny.
>
> Does that still exist anywhere?
If nowhere else, Larry's got a copy IN HIS HEAD. :)
--
I have heard that the universe does not support atomic operations
(although I've not see
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 13:42, Simon Cozens wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Wall) writes:
> > It's the coherence that I can't delegate, and if I tried to, we would
> > certainly end up with Second System Syndrome Done Wrong, instead of Done
> > Right.
> You know, it's statements like this that m
> "SC" == Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SC> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bennett Todd) writes:
>> 2004-02-26T14:26:47 Larry Wall:
>> > Well now, I remember Perl 0, sonny.
>>
>> Does that still exist anywhere?
SC> If nowhere else, Larry's got a copy IN HIS HEAD. :)
better than
It's that time of year again, and we're looking for reviewers for the
2nd edition of "Perl 6 Essentials". The review will start mid-March and
last about a week. Drop me a message if you're interested. We may have
to narrow down the list of volunteers a bit. 15 sets of comments is
about the maximum
18 matches
Mail list logo
