Bryan Burgers wrote:
On 10/15/05, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/14/05, Markus Laire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perl does have CPAN, but the problem is that there are no standard
modules, and so there can be several modules doing the same thing.
And what is the problem with th
On 16 Oct 2005 03:46:25 -, David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:38:55 +0200, Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Yesterday I spend some hours getting pugs to understand
> > translitterations with multiple ranges in each pair. E.g.
On Oct 17, 2005, at 12:32 PM, TSa wrote:
This also means that they would not (directly) be inheritable
since inheritence moves along superclass lines, and not with
@ISA. I am also not sure what you mean about multi-methods
either, could you please explain more?
Symmetric MMD at least h
HaloO,
Stevan Little wrote:
Now, as for class methods, I suppose it is possible to just stash then
in the classes symbol table like with variables. However, do we then
loose the method call syntax?
I think not. But the current notion seems to drift closer to my
idea of "free methods" versus
On 2005-10-15 15:28, "Ilmari Vacklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 09:49:30AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 07:39:36PM +0300, wolverian wrote:
>> : IMHO just call it "self" (by default) and be done with it. :)
>>
>> Let it be so.
>
> Somewhat off-ta
Miroslav
On Oct 17, 2005, at 7:35 AM, Miroslav Silovic wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think what bothers me most about this is that it seems there is
no way to tell the difference between class methods and instance
methods. That the distinction is only made when the body of the
metho
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think what bothers me most about this is that it seems there is no
way to tell the difference between class methods and instance
methods. That the distinction is only made when the body of the
method does something which is is not supposed to do (method called
