[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think what bothers me most about this is that it seems there is no
way to tell the difference between class methods and instance
methods. That the distinction is only made when the body of the
method does something which is is not supposed to do (method called
Miroslav
On Oct 17, 2005, at 7:35 AM, Miroslav Silovic wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think what bothers me most about this is that it seems there is
no way to tell the difference between class methods and instance
methods. That the distinction is only made when the body of the
On 2005-10-15 15:28, Ilmari Vacklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 09:49:30AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 07:39:36PM +0300, wolverian wrote:
: IMHO just call it self (by default) and be done with it. :)
Let it be so.
Somewhat off-tangent: does this
HaloO,
Stevan Little wrote:
Now, as for class methods, I suppose it is possible to just stash then
in the classes symbol table like with variables. However, do we then
loose the method call syntax?
I think not. But the current notion seems to drift closer to my
idea of free methods versus
