Larry Wall wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:36:36AM -0700, Thom Boyer wrote:
From S02:
The double angles may be written either with French quotes, «$foo
@bar[]»||, or with "Texas" quotes, <<$foo @bar[]>>,|| as th
Inadvertently replied to this off-list...
Moritz wrote:
>There's no need for any "keyword" to be in STD.pm. STD.pm just defines
>the grammar. Syntactically fork will be like just another sub, so it can
>safely be handled in the compiler's runtime.
>
>> * Where will C, C, and possible friends (e.g.
Larry Wall wrote:
Now, it might well be that a Perl standards body could specify a
mininum suggested set of modules for any distribution to enhance
interoperability, but we haven't got to that point yet, I don't think.
This would be great though!!
Even if it is afterward, it is still a lot b
Jonathan Lang skribis 2007-12-06 16:36 (-0800):
> > I know it used to be that way back near the Dawn of Time, but methods
> > don't automatically topicalize anymore unless you explicitly name
> > one of the parameters '$_':
> Huh. I guess I need to review current standards for method
> declaration
Larry Wall wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 08:40:10AM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
> : or (I think):
> :
> : method test ($value) {
> : setup();
> : when $value { doit() } #[smart-match the calling object $_ against
> $value.]
> : }
>
> I know it used to be that way back near the Dawn
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Smylers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> brian d foy writes:
>
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Larry Wall
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 08:28:48AM -0800, brian d foy wrote:
> > >
> > > : In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Larry Wal
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 08:40:10AM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: or (I think):
:
: method test ($value) {
: setup();
: when $value { doit() } #[smart-match the calling object $_ against
$value.]
: }
I know it used to be that way back near the Dawn of Time, but methods
don't automatic
I'll try to reply as good as possible, but I'm sure others will do better.
David Brunton wrote:
> This last SOTO re-reminded me of what an inveterate fan I am of Perl 6. Wow.
>
> My question today is about concurrency. I can imagine how things like IPC
> Mailboxes
> (e.g. RFC 86) happen in mo
This last SOTO re-reminded me of what an inveterate fan I am of Perl 6. Wow.
My question today is about concurrency. I can imagine how things like IPC
Mailboxes (e.g. RFC 86) happen in modules. I can also imagine why Threads
(e.g. RFC 1) should be in modules- given the obvious dependence on u
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 07:43:25PM -0800, Peter Scott wrote:
: I do feel strongly that we need some sort of solution to this so that Perl
: 6 is not merely an outstanding framework that leaves all domain-specific
: extensions to the end user.
Perl 6 as a language doesn't address this (except to ke
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 12:09:48PM +, Smylers wrote:
: This isn't something which needs to influence language design -- in the
: sense that it doesn't need to be sorted before the design can be final
: and Perl 6 released.
Well, and to the extent that it needs to influence language design, it
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:36:36AM -0700, Thom Boyer wrote:
> From S02:
>
>
>The double angles may be written either with French quotes, «$foo
>@bar[]»||, or with "Texas" quotes, <<$foo @bar[]>>,|| as the ASCII
>wo
From S02:
The double angles may be written either with French quotes, «$foo
@bar[]»||, or with "Texas" quotes, <<$foo @bar[]>>,|| as the ASCII
workaround.
---
This is another great example of why I love this list. :o]
I live in GA, so far out in the boonies that I can't get cable or
broadband at *all* except for by satellite. I've stopped trying to
explain what I do, because I start saying things like this, and they
glaze and visibly regret it, lol
14 matches
Mail list logo
