Hi,
i just wanted to ask what was about the method calling syntax on
$self, and why does
method ()
not work for calling a method on $self? (like in C++)
cya,
Robin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robin Redeker
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 04:08:17PM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:32:37PM +0200, Robin Redeker wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i just wanted to ask what was about the method calling syntax on
> > $self, and why does
> >
> >me
6_anymore;
?
thanks,
Robin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robin Redeker
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 08:50:35AM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 08:10:00AM +0200, Robin Redeker wrote:
> > And what will be the default syntax to call
> > a method on self? If everyone has completly other
> > preferences about this, for example t
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 08:50:35AM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 08:10:00AM +0200, Robin Redeker wrote:
> > And what will be the default syntax to call
> > a method on self? If everyone has completly other
> > preferences about this, for example t
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 10:07:24AM -0400, Stevan Little wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2005, at 2:10 AM, Robin Redeker wrote:
> >And what will be the default syntax to call
> >a method on self? If everyone has completly other
> >preferences about this, for example this horrible ./m
ie. ./method ()).
>
> I wasn't thinking 'cool', I was thinking 'visually distinctive and
> mnemonic'. I actually think o. is cooler.
Yes, i would like o. more too. At least it doesn't introduce
a completly meaningless '/' preceded by a '.'.
Robin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robin Redeker
tax/semantic of that.
greetings,
Robin Redeker
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robin Redeker
