not be as
good as frozen, but it's closer :o
That's my take on it, of course; I could be entirely wrong, too
--attriel
...
Ow, my head hurts now :o
--attriel
, indentation necessary but not parser-graphically
dicatated :o
--attriel
(parsergraphically?)
a value to it, i'm unassigning
the value I've given it, which is a distinction that I think may be
relevant ...)
--attriel
is that possible? aside from it being disturbing to write undef but
undef :o
--attriel
(the first suggestion is serious, but the syntax is flawed; the second
suggestion has better syntax but is tongue-in-cheek suggested ... )
...
Could someone explain how to know what's the indirect object? (who knew
the sentence diagramming would be USEFUL!!)
--attriel
mystery conversion step
that seems contradictory but somehow exists anyway :o)
--attriel
Than and I can't come up with how to use that $a
== 7 | 200 I guess :o
And would the consistency rules require them to be:
~ ~ ? so that the ops look similar? (If so, I'm gonna vote that ~
looks like a fish and is just weird :)
--attriel
(..., @a), sort(@b));
(again, more useful for a longer chain)
--attriel
were using @'s, and somehow that translated to
this is an array opthingy :o
$foo ~ print ~ STDERR;
That makes a fair amount of sense (and certainly more than any of my
array-based flawed examples :)
Thanks for clearing up my fogginess :o
--attriel
, if
it were the stated style, people would be expected to understand it, but
it would still be counterintuitive, IMO)
--attriel
majority of the cases, so it probably SHOULD continue being the default
low-effort result ...
I had a point. I think I made it in there.
--attriel
12 matches
Mail list logo
