Referring to Patrick's blog about an official 'useable' version of
Rakudo, a suggestion:
Since Rakudo* (not sure how it is to be written) is intended to be a
cut-down version of perl6.0.0 that is useable, how about Rakudo-lite?
Its just that */star/whatever doesnt convey [to me] the fact that
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 04:30:07PM +0400, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> Referring to Patrick's blog about an official 'useable' version of
> Rakudo, a suggestion:
>
> Since Rakudo* (not sure how it is to be written) is intended to be a
> cut-down version of perl6.0.0 that is useable, how about Ra
Rakudo Light
Rakudo Star Light
Rakudo Rock Star
Rakudo Hard Rock
Rakudo Play Hard
Rakudo Play
Just musing...
How about "Rake"?
=Austin
Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Referring to Patrick's blog about an official 'useable' version of
Rakudo, a suggestion:
Since Rakudo* (not sure how it is to be written) is intended to be a
cut-down version of perl6.0.0 that is useable, how about Rakudo-lite?
Its just
Ruby anyone? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rake_(software).
Henry
On August 9, 2009 11:44:24 am Austin Hastings wrote:
> How about "Rake"?
>
> =Austin
>
> Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> > Referring to Patrick's blog about an official 'useable' version of
> > Rakudo, a suggestion:
> >
> > Since R
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 10:19:44AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 04:30:07PM +0400, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> > Referring to Patrick's blog about an official 'useable' version of
> > Rakudo, a suggestion:
> >
> > Since Rakudo* (not sure how it is to be written) is in
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 10:57:16PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
> > > Since Rakudo* (not sure how it is to be written) is intended to be a
> > > cut-down version of perl6.0.0 that is useable, how about Rakudo-lite?
> >
> > Hmmm, that's a very reasonable name. Over the past few days I've
> > become a
On 2009-Aug-9, at 6:30 am, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Its just that */star/whatever doesnt convey [to me] the fact that
its a sub-set of of Perl6.
I like "*"... it has more personality than "lite". (Or even "light".)
Though since it's a subset, we could always call it "Rakudo ⊂"!
On 2009-
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 04:35:42PM -0600, David Green wrote:
> On 2009-Aug-9, at 3:57 pm, Tim Bunce wrote:
>> Perhaps it's worth asking what we might call the release after that
>> one.
>> "Rakudo not-quite-so-lite"?
>
> Rakudo ** (aka "Rakudo Exponentiation")? Though I think Patrick is
> opti
