Re: Illustration of stuff we've been discussing

On May 28, 2009, at 10:27 , John M. Dlugosz wrote: Daniel Ruoso daniel-at-ruoso.com |Perl 6| wrote: Em Qui, 2009-05-28 às 00:24 -0500, John M. Dlugosz escreveu: Please see and talk to me about it. The illustratino is cool, but it doesn't

Re: Illustration of stuff we've been discussing

Daniel Ruoso daniel-at-ruoso.com |Perl 6| wrote: Em Qui, 2009-05-28 às 09:27 -0500, John M. Dlugosz escreveu: Daniel Ruoso daniel-at-ruoso.com |Perl 6| wrote: Em Qui, 2009-05-28 às 00:24 -0500, John M. Dlugosz escreveu: Please see

Re: Illustration of stuff we've been discussing

Daniel Ruoso daniel-at-ruoso.com |Perl 6| wrote: Em Qui, 2009-05-28 às 00:24 -0500, John M. Dlugosz escreveu: Please see and talk to me about it. The illustratino is cool, but it doesn't take into account the possibility of: @a[0]

Re: Illustration of stuff we've been discussing

Larry Wall larry-at-wall.org |Perl 6| wrote: Basically, (ignoring STD's definition of name) I view @a[0] as a name, in the sense of identifying a unique object. It just happens to contain navigational elements like a URL. OK, that that might be what was meant in the synopses when it was penne

Re: Illustration of stuff we've been discussing

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:06:18PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: : Em Qui, 2009-05-28 às 09:27 -0500, John M. Dlugosz escreveu: : > Daniel Ruoso daniel-at-ruoso.com |Perl 6| wrote: : > > Em Qui, 2009-05-28 às 00:24 -0500, John M. Dlugosz escreveu: : > >> Please see

Re: Illustration of stuff we've been discussing

Em Qui, 2009-05-28 às 09:27 -0500, John M. Dlugosz escreveu: > Daniel Ruoso daniel-at-ruoso.com |Perl 6| wrote: > > Em Qui, 2009-05-28 às 00:24 -0500, John M. Dlugosz escreveu: > >> Please see > >> and talk to me about it. > > The illustratino is

Re: Illustration of stuff we've been discussing

Daniel Ruoso daniel-at-ruoso.com |Perl 6| wrote: Em Qui, 2009-05-28 às 00:24 -0500, John M. Dlugosz escreveu: Please see and talk to me about it. The illustratino is cool, but it doesn't take into account the possibility of: @a[0]

Re: Illustration of stuff we've been discussing

Em Qui, 2009-05-28 às 00:24 -0500, John M. Dlugosz escreveu: > Please see > and talk to me about it. The illustratino is cool, but it doesn't take into account the possibility of: @a[0] := $x; which means that an array is, theoretically, an a

Illustration of stuff we've been discussing

Please see and talk to me about it. --John