Re: S03- Unicode feed operator, no prefix:<=>

2009-06-10 Thread Timothy S. Nelson
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, John M. Dlugosz wrote: I have trouble using the arrow character in general. It's because of the fonts: they have such tiny heads the arrow doesn't show well at all, or match the surrounding character style. So I tend to avoid them on web pages, and any document where I'

Re: S03- Unicode feed operator, no prefix:<=>

2009-06-10 Thread John M. Dlugosz
yary not.com-at-gmail.com |Perl 6| wrote: I'm about halfway through reading Synopsis 3 and have a couple comments/questions. Is there, should there be unicode synonyms for the feed operators? eg <== is also ⇐ ⇐ LEFTWARDS DOUBLE ARROW ==> is also ⇒ ⇒ RIGHTWARDS DOUBLE ARROW I don't see a

Re: S03- Unicode feed operator, no prefix:<=>

2009-06-10 Thread John M. Dlugosz
yary not.com-at-gmail.com |Perl 6| wrote: I'm about halfway through reading Synopsis 3 and have a couple comments/questions. Is there, should there be unicode synonyms for the feed operators? eg <== is also ⇐ ⇐ LEFTWARDS DOUBLE ARROW ==> is also ⇒ ⇒ RIGHTWARDS DOUBLE ARROW I don't see a

Re: S03- Unicode feed operator, no prefix:<=>

2009-06-10 Thread Timothy S. Nelson
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, yary wrote: I'm about halfway through reading Synopsis 3 and have a couple comments/questions. Is there, should there be unicode synonyms for the feed operators? eg <== is also ? ⇐ LEFTWARDS DOUBLE ARROW ==> is also ? ⇒ RIGHTWARDS DOUBLE ARROW I don't see as obviou

S03- Unicode feed operator, no prefix:<=>

2009-06-10 Thread yary
I'm about halfway through reading Synopsis 3 and have a couple comments/questions. Is there, should there be unicode synonyms for the feed operators? eg <== is also ⇐ ⇐LEFTWARDS DOUBLE ARROW ==> is also ⇒ ⇒RIGHTWARDS DOUBLE ARROW I don't see as obvious candidates for <<== and ==>>, maybe