Two Quick Things

and Exegesis 3 were expected five weeks ago. Where are we now? -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Perl 6 summaries

Duty calls. Can someone pick up the summary for this and the next couple of weeks? Email Simon for details. Thanks, -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Perl 6 summaries?

. Of course, this is probably an impractical posting - if folks wanted the summary, why would they be subscribed to an actual list? But if you are, there you go. And Simon, if you're out there, I'm looking for you. (Or did I miss something?) -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Perl, the new generation

On Wednesday 16 May 2001 15:32, Nathan Torkington wrote: Bryan C. Warnock writes: I think the biggest fear isn't that Perl is going to grow out of its niche, but that it's going to outgrow it. It's great that Perl has been able to expand to be so many things to so many people

Meta-help on development of perl

mpany" as a suggestion, withhold your email - I'm considering it. Thanks, -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED] ^ (To be fair, this is currently in the "working" stage, so please hold judgement in reserve.)

Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)

e question of why seperate them in the first place. -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: State of PDD 0

, if we put too much structure in place, no one will use it, and we'll either see more non-experimental Experimental PDDs, or no PDDs at all. That's a good idea, but I'm not entirely convinced that it's the only one, the fairest one or the most practical one. I'm all ears. Er... eyes. -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, strict, and CPAN)

documentation. Lest the architect say, "Build me a house", and then complain that we don't match the plans he never gave us. -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: State of PDD 0

go with mulitple documents, is the numbering scheme concurrent? I'm also thinking heavily about change requests, and whether they should be separate, or a stage beyond Standard. Pros and cons welcome. -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: This week on the perl6 mailing lists

is Perl6. Until that shows fruit, we'd be very unlikely to tip more money in the way of perl6. Good luck getting blood from a ston^W^W^W^W money from Microsoft :-) Particularly after this: http://news.cnet.com/investor/news/newsitem/0-9900-1028-4825719-RHAT.html?tag=ltnc -- Bryan C. Warnock

The PDD PDD.

the attachment, which is a skeleton PDD.) =head1 TITLE Perl Design Documents =head1 VERSION =head2 CURRENT Maintainer: Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Class: Meta PDD Number: TBD Version: 2 Status: Proposed Last Modified: 9 February 2001 PDD Format: 0 Language

Re: Art Of Unix Programming on Perl

ability" is now "stagnatation." Microsoft's PR department just earned their paychecks. More, more, more useless things..... -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Critique available

- Original Message - From: "Nathan Torkington" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not only is it wrong, it's also hurting our chances. When an article in perl.com is so overwhelmingly negative about the work so far, do you think that stirs confidence in what we're doing? Do you think that people

Re: Update on the RFC Process

answered, as opposed to ignored or flamed. Hint hint.) -- Bryan C. Warnock ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: The Future - grim.

people (more unknowns, as it were, as most of the established community is here already) had more things to say, but you'll filter out discussions by people you don't recognize? (I understood your point. This was just an interesting way of presenting it.) -- Bryan C. Warnock ([EMAIL PROTECTED])